- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01627782
A Study of Ketamine in Patients With Treatment-resistant Depression
April 25, 2025 updated by: Janssen Research & Development, LLC
A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group, Dose Frequency Study of Ketamine in Subjects With Treatment-resistant Depression
The purpose of this study is to explore the optimal dose frequency of ketamine in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD).
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This is a double-blind (patients and study personnel do not know the identity of the administered treatments), randomized (the drug is assigned by chance), placebo-controlled (placebo is a substance that appears identical to the treatment and has no active ingredients), parallel arm study (each group of patients will be treated at the same time).
The study will consist of a screening phase of up to 4 weeks, a 4-week double-blind treatment phase (Day 1 to Day 29), and a 3-week post treatment (follow up) phase.
In the double-blind phase, patients will receive over 4 weeks either intravenous (IV) infusions of placebo (2 or 3 times weekly) or IV infusions of ketamine (2 or 3 times weekly).
The total study duration for each patient will be a maximum of 13 weeks.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
68
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Alabama
-
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
-
-
Arkansas
-
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
-
-
Colorado
-
Centennial, Colorado, United States
-
-
Connecticut
-
Hartford, Connecticut, United States
-
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
-
-
Georgia
-
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
-
-
Maryland
-
Rockville, Maryland, United States
-
-
New Jersey
-
Marlton, New Jersey, United States
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States
-
-
South Carolina
-
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
-
-
Texas
-
Dallas, Texas, United States
-
-
Utah
-
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 64 years (Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Be medically stable on the basis of clinical laboratory tests performed at screening
- Meet diagnostic criteria for recurrent major depressive disorder (MDD), without psychotic features
- Have a history of inadequate response, ie treatment was not successful, to at least 1 antidepressant
- Have an Inventory of Depressive Symptoms-Clinician rated, 30 item (IDS-C30) total score >= 40 at screening and predose at Day 1
- Inpatient or agreed to be admitted to the clinic on each dosing day
Exclusion Criteria:
- Has uncontrolled hypertension
- Has a history of, or current signs and symptoms of diseases, infections or conditions that in the opinion of the investigator, would make participation not be in the best interest (eg, compromise the well-being) of the patient or that could prevent, limit, or confound the protocol-specified assessments
- Has known allergies, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to ketamine or its excipients
- Is unable to read and understand the consent forms and patient reported outcomes, complete study-related procedures, and/or communicate with the study staff
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo 3 times/week
|
Form= intravenous infusion, route= intravenous (IV) use.
IV infusions of placebo 2 times weekly or IV infusions of placebo 3 times weekly.
|
|
Experimental: Ketamine 3 times/week
|
Type= exact number, unit= mg/kg, number= 0.5, form= intravenous infusion, route= intravenous (IV) use.
IV infusions of ketamine 0.50 mg/kg, 2 times weekly or IV infusions of ketamine 0.50 mg/kg, 3 times weekly.
|
|
Experimental: Ketamine 2 times/week
|
Type= exact number, unit= mg/kg, number= 0.5, form= intravenous infusion, route= intravenous (IV) use.
IV infusions of ketamine 0.50 mg/kg, 2 times weekly or IV infusions of ketamine 0.50 mg/kg, 3 times weekly.
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo 2 times/week
|
Form= intravenous infusion, route= intravenous (IV) use.
IV infusions of placebo 2 times weekly or IV infusions of placebo 3 times weekly.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score From Baseline to Day 15
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Day 15
|
The MADRS is a clinician-rated scale designed to measure depression severity and detects changes due to antidepressant treatment.
The test consists of 10 items, each of which is scored from 0 (item not present or normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptoms), for a total score of 60.
Higher scores represent a more severe condition.
|
Baseline (Day 1) and Day 15
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score From Baseline to Day 29
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Day 29
|
The MADRS is a clinician-rated scale designed to measure depression severity and detects changes due to antidepressant treatment.
The test consists of 10 items, each of which is scored from 0 (item not present or normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptoms), for a total score of 60.
Higher scores represent a more severe condition.
|
Baseline (Day 1) and Day 29
|
|
Number of Responders Based on Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score
Time Frame: Day 15 and Day 29
|
Participants with a reduction in the MADRS total score of greater than or equal to (>=) 50 percent from baseline were defined as responders.
The MADRS is a clinician-rated scale designed to measure depression severity and detects changes due to antidepressant treatment.
The test consists of 10 items, each of which is scored from 0 (item not present or normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptoms), for a total score of 60.
Higher scores represent a more severe condition.
|
Day 15 and Day 29
|
|
Number of Remitters Based on Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score
Time Frame: Day 15 and Day 29
|
Participants who had a MADRS total score of less than or equal to (<=) 10 were considered remitters.
The MADRS is a clinician-rated scale designed to measure depression severity and detects changes due to antidepressant treatment.
The test consists of 10 items, each of which is scored from 0 (item not present or normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptoms), for a total score of 60.
Higher scores represent a more severe condition.
|
Day 15 and Day 29
|
|
Number of Sustained Responders Based on Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score
Time Frame: Day 15
|
Sustained response on Day 15 was defined as achieving an onset of antidepressant response within the first week that is maintained to the end of study Day 15.
The MADRS is a clinician-rated scale designed to measure depression severity and detects changes due to antidepressant treatment.
The test consists of 10 items, each of which is scored from 0 (item not present or normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptoms), for a total score of 60.
Higher scores represent a more severe condition.
|
Day 15
|
|
Change in Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score From Baseline to Endpoint (Day 29)
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Endpoint (Day 29)
|
The CGI-S was used to rate the severity of the participants illness at the time of assessment, relative to the clinician's past experience with participants who had the same diagnosis and improvement with treatment.
Considering total clinical experience, a participant was assessed on severity of mental illness at the time of rating according to: 0= not assessed; 1=normal (not at all ill); 2=borderline mentally ill; 3=mildly ill; 4=moderately ill; 5=markedly ill; 6=severely ill; 7=among the most extremely ill participants.
|
Baseline (Day 1) and Endpoint (Day 29)
|
|
Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Score at Endpoint of Double Blind Phase
Time Frame: Endpoint (Day 29)
|
The CGI-I is a 7-point scale that was used to assess how much the participants illness was improved or worsened relative to a baseline state at the beginning of the intervention and rated as: 0= not assessed; 1=very much improved; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change; 5=minimally worse; 6=much worse; 7=very much worse.
|
Endpoint (Day 29)
|
|
Change in Patient Global Impression-Severity (PGI-S) Score From Baseline to Endpoint (Day 29)
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Endpoint (Day 29)
|
The PGI-S is an 11-point (0 to 10) scale that required the participant to rate the severity of their illness at the time of assessment, relative to the participants past experience.
Considering their total experience, the participant was to assess the severity of their depression illness at the time of rating as none, mild, moderate or severe.
The scale is rated as, 0=very well and 10=very poor.
|
Baseline (Day 1) and Endpoint (Day 29)
|
|
Patient Global Impression-Change (PGI-C) Score at Endpoint of Double Blind Phase
Time Frame: Endpoint (Day 29)
|
The PGI-C is a 7-point scale that required the subject to assess how much their illness had improved or worsened relative to a baseline state at the beginning of the intervention.
The response options were: very much improved; much improved; improved (just enough to make a difference); no change; worse (just enough to make a difference); much worse; or very much worse.
The scale is rated as, 1=very much improved and 7=very much worse.
|
Endpoint (Day 29)
|
|
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Ketamine
Time Frame: Pre-infusion, 20, 40 (End of the Infusion), 45, 50, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240 and 360 minutes post-infusion on Day 1 and Day 15
|
The Cmax is the maximum observed plasma concentration of drug.
|
Pre-infusion, 20, 40 (End of the Infusion), 45, 50, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240 and 360 minutes post-infusion on Day 1 and Day 15
|
|
Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Ketamine
Time Frame: Pre-infusion, 20, 40 (End of the Infusion), 45, 50, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240 and 360 minutes post-infusion on Day 1 and Day 15
|
The Tmax is defined as actual sampling time to reach maximum observed drug concentration.
|
Pre-infusion, 20, 40 (End of the Infusion), 45, 50, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240 and 360 minutes post-infusion on Day 1 and Day 15
|
|
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Time (AUC[0-last])
Time Frame: Pre-infusion, 20, 40 (End of the Infusion), 45, 50, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240 and 360 minutes post-infusion on Day 1 and Day 15
|
The AUC(0-last) is the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to last quantifiable time.
|
Pre-infusion, 20, 40 (End of the Infusion), 45, 50, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240 and 360 minutes post-infusion on Day 1 and Day 15
|
|
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Infinite Time (AUC[0-infinity])
Time Frame: Pre-infusion, 20, 40 (End of the Infusion), 45, 50, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240 and 360 minutes post-infusion on Day 1 and Day 15
|
The AUC (0-infinity) is the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinite time, calculated as the sum of AUC (last) and C(last)/lambda(z); wherein AUC(last) is area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to last quantifiable time, C(last) is the last observed quantifiable concentration, and lambda(z) is elimination rate constant.
|
Pre-infusion, 20, 40 (End of the Infusion), 45, 50, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240 and 360 minutes post-infusion on Day 1 and Day 15
|
|
Total Systemic Clearance (CL) of Ketamine
Time Frame: Pre-infusion, 20, 40 (End of the Infusion), 45, 50, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240 and 360 minutes post-infusion on Day 1 and Day 15
|
The CL is a quantitative measure of the rate at which a drug substance is removed from the body.
|
Pre-infusion, 20, 40 (End of the Infusion), 45, 50, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240 and 360 minutes post-infusion on Day 1 and Day 15
|
|
Volume of Distribution at Steady-State (Vss) of Ketamine
Time Frame: Pre-infusion, 20, 40 (End of the Infusion), 45, 50, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240 and 360 minutes post-infusion on Day 1 and Day 15
|
The Vss is defined as the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired serum concentration of ketamine at steady state.
|
Pre-infusion, 20, 40 (End of the Infusion), 45, 50, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240 and 360 minutes post-infusion on Day 1 and Day 15
|
|
Elimination Half-Life (t1/2)
Time Frame: Pre-infusion, 20, 40 (End of the Infusion), 45, 50, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240 and 360 minutes post-infusion on Day 1 and Day 15
|
The elimination half-life (t1/2) is the time measured for the plasma concentration to decrease by 1 half to its original concentration.
It is associated with the terminal slope of the semi logarithmic drug concentration-time curve, and is calculated as 0.693/lambda(z).
|
Pre-infusion, 20, 40 (End of the Infusion), 45, 50, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240 and 360 minutes post-infusion on Day 1 and Day 15
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Study Director: Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial, Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Lewis S, Romano C, De Bruecker G, Murrough JW, Shelton R, Singh JB, Jamieson C. Analysis of Clinical Trial Exit Interview Data in Patients with Treatment-Resistant Depression. Patient. 2019 Oct;12(5):527-537. doi: 10.1007/s40271-019-00369-8.
- Johnson KM, Devine JM, Ho KF, Howard KA, Saretsky TL, Jamieson CA. Evidence to Support Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale Administration Every 24 Hours to Assess Rapid Onset of Treatment Response. J Clin Psychiatry. 2016 Dec;77(12):1681-1686. doi: 10.4088/JCP.15m10253.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
August 6, 2012
Primary Completion (Actual)
September 12, 2013
Study Completion (Actual)
September 12, 2013
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
June 22, 2012
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 22, 2012
First Posted (Estimated)
June 26, 2012
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
April 29, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 25, 2025
Last Verified
April 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Mental Disorders
- Behavioral Symptoms
- Mood Disorders
- Depression
- Depressive Disorder
- Depressive Disorder, Major
- Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Anesthetics
- Central Nervous System Depressants
- Sensory System Agents
- Analgesics
- Neurotransmitter Agents
- Anesthetics, Intravenous
- Anesthetics, General
- Excitatory Amino Acid Agents
- Anesthetics, Dissociative
- Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists
- Ketamine
Other Study ID Numbers
- CR100886
- KETIVTRD2002 (Other Identifier: Janssen Research & Development, LLC)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Yes
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Major Depressive Disorder
-
Gang WangWest China Hospital; The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University; Tianjin... and other collaboratorsRecruitingMajor Depressive Disorder (MDD) | Depression - Major Depressive DisorderChina
-
Brian MickeyNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)RecruitingMajor Depressive Episode | Depression - Major Depressive Disorder | Treatment-Resistant Major Depressive DisorderUnited States
-
Unity Health TorontoUniversity of Toronto; Toronto Metropolitan UniversityRecruitingMajor Depressive Disorder (MDD) | Major Depressive Episode | Treatment-Resistant Major Depressive DisorderCanada
-
Stanford UniversityNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)Recruiting
-
TakedaRecruitingMajor Depressive DisorderJapan
-
Neurocrine BiosciencesRecruitingMajor Depressive DisorderSpain, Serbia, United States, Bulgaria, Canada, Estonia, Italy, Poland, Taiwan, Australia, South Korea
-
Luye Pharma Group Ltd.Enrolling by invitationMajor Depressive DisorderChina
-
NeuroQore Inc.Makromed Inc.Enrolling by invitationMajor Depressive DisorderUnited States
-
Aalborg University HospitalRecruitingDepressive Disorder | Depression | Depressive Episode | Depressive Disorders | Depressive Episodes | Depression - Major Depressive Disorder | Depressive Disorder, Major Depressive DisorderDenmark
-
The Royal Ottawa Mental Health CentreNot yet recruitingDepression | Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) | Depressive Episode | Depression - Major Depressive DisorderCanada
Clinical Trials on Placebo
-
SamA Pharmaceutical Co., LtdUnknownAcute Bronchitis | Acute Upper Respiratory Tract InfectionKorea, Republic of
-
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)CompletedCannabis UseUnited States
-
AstraZenecaParexel; Spandauer Damm 130; 14050; Berlin, GermanyCompletedMale Subjects With Type II Diabetes (T2DM)Germany
-
AkesoNot yet recruitingAtopic DermatitisChina
-
Heptares Therapeutics LimitedCompletedPharmacokinetics | Safety IssuesUnited Kingdom
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveUnited Kingdom, Netherlands
-
Shijiazhuang Yiling Pharmaceutical Co. LtdXuanwu Hospital, BeijingCompleted
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedInfections, BacterialUnited States
-
Chong Kun Dang PharmaceuticalUnknownHypertension | DyslipidemiasKorea, Republic of