Real Life Effectiveness in Patients With Not Optimally Controlled Asthma

July 23, 2012 updated by: Shih-Lung Cheng, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital

Real Life Effectiveness in Patients With Not Optimally Controlled Asthma: Symbicort SMART, or Other ICS/LABA With as Needed SABA

In real life, the investigators will be using different strategies including SMART therapy or other ICS/LABA (medium and high dose) therapy and measure the efficacy for asthma control.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

  1. All not-well controlled asthma patients would include the study.
  2. We will compare three ways of asthma control including SMART, fixed doses with regular doses and fixed doses with higher doses
  3. We will evaluate the efficacy/safety for these not-well controlled patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

200

Phase

  • Phase 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • asthma not well control

Exclusion Criteria:

  • COPD

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Symbicort

We will evaluate the efficacy fot Symbicort use. The usage was 2 doses bid for one year period.

Intervention drug: Seretide fixed doses therapy

Using Symbicort and Seretide for asthma control measurements Compared with efficacy and safety
Other Names:
  • Symbicort compared with Seretide
Experimental: Seretide
In non-well asthma controlled patients, experimental study with Seretide regular doses (125 2 doses bid for one year) and higher doses (250 2 doses bid) for one year
Using Symbicort and Seretide for asthma control measurements Compared with efficacy and safety
Other Names:
  • Symbicort compared with Seretide

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the percentage of asthma total and well control
Time Frame: one year
F/U clinical asthma control status and percentage of Acute exacerbation
one year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
percentage of asthma acute exacerbation
Time Frame: one year
one year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 19, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 20, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

July 23, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 24, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 23, 2012

Last Verified

July 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Asthma

Clinical Trials on Seretide

3
Subscribe