Study Investigating the Safety and Efficacy of HP802-247 in the Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers

February 16, 2016 updated by: Healthpoint

A Phase 3 Randomized, Double Blind, Vehicle Controlled Study Investigating the Safety and Efficacy of HP802-247 in the Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers

This study is being done to find out if an investigational product called HP802-247 can help people with venous leg ulcers. Investigational means that HP802-247 has not been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

This research is being done to compare the efficacy of HP802-247 plus compression therapy against Vehicle plus compression therapy in achieving complete wound closure over the 12-week treatment period. Vehicle looks the same as HP802-247 but contains no cells.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

447

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • British Columbia
      • Vancovuer, British Columbia, Canada, V5Z1M9
    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8R2R3
      • London, Ontario, Canada, N6C5J1
      • Sudbury, Ontario, Canada, P3E5J1
    • Quebec
      • Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada, J1H5N4
    • Arizona
      • Glendale, Arizona, United States, 85306
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85012
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85006
      • Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85724
      • Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85723
    • California
      • Carlsbad, California, United States, 92009
      • Castro Valley, California, United States, 94546
      • Fresno, California, United States, 93720
      • Laguna Hills, California, United States, 92653
      • Long Beach, California, United States, 90822
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92013
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94115
      • Stockton, California, United States, 95204
      • Sylmar, California, United States, 91342
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20007
    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32605
      • Hialeah, Florida, United States, 33013
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33125
      • South Miami, Florida, United States, 33143
      • Tamarac, Florida, United States, 33321
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60616
      • Jacksonville, Illinois, United States, 62650
      • North Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60064
      • Springfield, Illinois, United States, 62702
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21224
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02118
      • Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States, 02138
    • Nevada
      • Las Vegas, Nevada, United States, 89119
    • New Jersey
      • Emerson, New Jersey, United States, 07630
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10025
    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27599
    • Ohio
      • Akron, Ohio, United States, 44307
    • Oklahoma
      • Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States, 74127
    • Pennsylvania
      • Dunmore, Pennsylvania, United States, 18512
      • Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, United States, 19610
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75390
      • Fort Worth, Texas, United States, 76104
      • Fort Worth, Texas, United States, 76107
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
    • Utah
      • St. George, Utah, United States, 84770
    • Virginia
      • Roanoke, Virginia, United States, 24013
    • Washington
      • Tacoma, Washington, United States, 98431

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Provide informed consent.
  • Age ≥ 18 years and of either sex.
  • Willing to comply with protocol instructions, including allowing all study assessments.
  • Have a venous leg ulcer (VLU) between the knee and ankle (at or above the malleolus), with a surface area ≥ 2.0 cm2 and ≤ 12.0 cm2
  • Venous insufficiency confirmed by duplex Doppler ultrasound examination for valvular or venous incompetence.
  • Arterial supply adequacy confirmed
  • Target ulcer involves a full thickness skin loss, but WITHOUT exposure of tendon, muscle, or bone.
  • Target ulcer duration ≥ 6 weeks but ≤ 104 weeks (24 months).
  • Acceptable state of health and nutrition

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of anaphylaxis, serum sickness, or erythema multiforme reaction to aprotinin, bovine serum albumin or bovine serum proteins, penicillin, streptomycin, amphotericin B.
  • Prior diagnosis of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus with elevated anti-DNA antibody titers, Buerger's disease (thromboangiitis obliterans), current diagnosis of vasculitis, or current diagnosis of claudication.
  • Therapy with another investigational agent within thirty (30) days of Screening, or during the study.
  • A target ulcer of non-venous etiologies (e.g., sickle cell anemia, necrobiosis lipoidica diabeticorum, pyoderma gangrenosum, vasculopathic or vasculitic).
  • Documented history of osteomyelitis at the target wound location within 6 months preceding the Screening Visit.
  • Refusal of or inability to tolerate compression therapy.
  • Therapy of the target ulcer with autologous skin graft, Apligraf™, or Dermagraft™ within 30 days preceding the Screening Visit.
  • History of cancer in the preceding 5 years (other than carcinoma in situ of the cervix or adequately treated non-melanoma skin cancers).
  • Any prior exposure to HP802-247 or its vehicle.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: HP802-247
HP802-247 (fibrinogen solution & thrombin solution containing living, irradiated, growth arrested keratinocytes and fibroblasts) 260 µL (130 µL, one spray, of each solution) containing 0.5 x 106 cells per mL every 14 days.
HP802-247 (fibrinogen solution & thrombin solution containing living, irradiated, growth arrested keratinocytes and fibroblasts) 260 µL (130 µL, one spray, of each solution) containing 0.5 x 106 cells per mL every 14 days.
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Vehicle
Vehicle Control (fibrinogen solution & thrombin solution without cells)
(fibrinogen solution & thrombin solution without cells)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Compare the Treatment Groups for the Proportion of Subjects With Complete Wound Closure Over the 12-Week Treatment Period From Baseline
Time Frame: 12 Weeks
For each treatment group the area of each subject's target ulcer was measured on a weekly basis, for up to 12 weeks, using a laser-based wound imaging system in conjunction with software to measure area. Following initial closure subjects returned for four weekly visits to confirm wound closure. Wounds that remained closed for four weeks were classified as confirmed closures; if a wound opened at any of the 4 visits it was not considered to have closed. For subjects who dropped from the study, their remaining visit values were imputed using LOCF; wound status of closed was not imputed.
12 Weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Compare the Efficacy of the Treatment Groups in Achieving Complete Wound Closure, Based on Time in Days to Closure Over the 12-Week Treatment Period From Baseline.
Time Frame: 12 Weeks
This key secondary outcome was based on a Cox Proportional Hazard Analysis and a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.
12 Weeks
Compare the Treatment Groups for the Percentage of Closed Ulcers at Each Visit of the 12-Week Treatment Period From Baseline
Time Frame: Weekly, over the 12 week treatment period, or until wound closure, which ever occurred first
Treatment groups were compared for the proportion of wounds closed at each weekly visit. For subjects who dropped from the study, their remaining visit values were imputed using LOCF.
Weekly, over the 12 week treatment period, or until wound closure, which ever occurred first
Number of Subjects With Durable Wound Healing Over the 3 Months Following Complete Wound Closure
Time Frame: Target ulcer status observed at two and three months following initial ulcer closure.
Subjects who completed the treatment period with confirmed wound closure were followed in the post-treatment period for a further two months to determine their closed wound status (remained closed/reopened), giving a measure of persistence of wound closure following completion of treatment.
Target ulcer status observed at two and three months following initial ulcer closure.
Change in Pain Associated With the Target Leg at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment Weeks
Time Frame: Weekly, over the 12 week treatment period, baseline
Target leg pain were measured using a Visual Analog Scale [Range: 0mm - 100mm]. Subjects marked their pain level on a 100 mm horizontal line, with a short vertical line across the scale, 0 denoting no pain and 100mm the maximum pain.
Weekly, over the 12 week treatment period, baseline
Change in Target Ulcer Pain
Time Frame: Weekly, over 12 week treament period, baseline
Target ulcer pain were measured using a Visual Analog Scale [Range: 0mm - 100mm]. Subjects marked their pain level on a 100 mm horizontal line, with a short vertical line across the scale, 0 denoting no pain and 100mm the maximum pain.
Weekly, over 12 week treament period, baseline
Compare the Efficacy of the Treatment Groups in Achieving Complete Wound Closure, Based on the Median Time (in Days) to Closure Over the 12-Week Treatment Period From Baseline.
Time Frame: 12 weeks
This key secondary outcome was based on a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2012

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2014

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 1, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 2, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

August 3, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

March 14, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 16, 2016

Last Verified

February 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Venous Leg Ulcers

Clinical Trials on HP-802-247

3
Subscribe