Safety and Efficacy Trial of HP802-247 in the Treatment of Chronic Venous Leg Ulcers

September 19, 2016 updated by: Healthpoint

A Phase 3 Randomized Safety and Efficacy Trial of HP802-247 in the Treatment of Chronic Venous Leg Ulcers (EU)

This study is being done to find out if an investigational product called HP802-247 can help people with venous leg ulcers. Investigational means that HP802-247 has not been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

This research is being done to compare the efficacy of HP802-247 plus compression therapy against Vehicle plus compression therapy in achieving complete wound closure over the 12-week treatment period. Vehicle looks the same as HP802-247 but contains no cells.

At least 440 subjects will participate. The study is going to be conducted in approximately 5 countries at approximately 50 sites across the European Union.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

See Brief Summary

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

252

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Anderlecht, Belgium
      • Brussels, Belgium
      • Edegen, Belgium
      • Gent, Belgium
      • Kortrijk, Belgium
      • Brno, Czech Republic
      • Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
      • Olomouc, Czech Republic
      • Pardubice, Czech Republic
      • Plzen-Bory, Czech Republic
      • Praha, Czech Republic
      • Trebic, Czech Republic
      • Uherske Hradiste, Czech Republic
      • Usti nad Labem, Czech Republic
      • Bochum, Germany
      • Bonn, Germany
      • Dresden, Germany
      • Duesseldorf, Germany
      • Essen, Germany
      • Freiburg, Germany
      • Goettingen, Germany
      • Greifswald, Germany
      • Hamburg, Germany
      • Kiel, Germany
      • Koeln, Germany
      • Krefeld, Germany
      • Magdeburg, Germany
      • Muenchen, Germany
      • Muenster, Germany
      • Budapest, Hungary
      • Debrecen, Hungary
      • Hatvan, Hungary
      • Oroshaza, Hungary
      • Satoraljaujhely, Hungary
      • Szeged, Hungary
      • Szolnok, Hungary
      • Katowice, Poland
      • Krakow, Poland
      • Lodz, Poland
      • Lublin, Poland
      • Poznan, Poland
      • Rzeszow, Poland
      • Studzionka, Poland
      • Warsaw, Poland
      • Warszawa, Poland
      • Wroclaw, Poland
      • Zabrze, Poland

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Provide informed consent.
  • Age ≥ 18 years and of either sex.
  • Willing to comply with protocol instructions, including allowing all study assessments.
  • Have a venous leg ulcer (VLU) between the knee and ankle (at or above the malleolus), with a surface area ≥ 2.0 cm2 and ≤ 12.0 cm2
  • Venous insufficiency confirmed by duplex Doppler ultrasound examination for valvular or venous incompetence.
  • Arterial supply adequacy confirmed
  • Target ulcer involves a full thickness skin loss, but WITHOUT exposure of tendon, muscle, or bone.
  • Target ulcer duration ≥ 6 weeks but ≤ 104 weeks (24 months).
  • Acceptable state of health and nutrition

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of anaphylaxis, serum sickness, or erythema multiforme reaction to aprotinin, bovine serum albumin or bovine serum proteins, penicillin, streptomycin, amphotericin B.
  • Prior diagnosis of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus with elevated anti-DNA antibody titers, Buerger's disease (thromboangiitis obliterans), current diagnosis of vasculitis, or current diagnosis of claudication.
  • Therapy with another investigational agent within thirty (30) days of Screening, or during the study.
  • A target ulcer of non-venous etiologies (e.g., sickle cell anemia, necrobiosis lipoidica diabeticorum, pyoderma gangrenosum, vasculopathic or vasculitic).
  • Documented history of osteomyelitis at the target wound location within 6 months preceding the Screening Visit.
  • Refusal of or inability to tolerate compression therapy.
  • Therapy of the target ulcer with autologous skin graft, Apligraf™, or Dermagraft™ within 30 days preceding the Screening Visit.
  • History of cancer in the preceding 5 years (other than carcinoma in situ of the cervix or adequately treated non-melanoma skin cancers).
  • Any prior exposure to HP802-247 or its vehicle.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: HP802-247 plus compression therapy
HP802-247 (fibrinogen solution & thrombin solution containing living, irradiated, growth arrested keratinocytes and fibroblasts) 260 µL (130 µL, one spray, of each solution) containing 0.5 X 10(6th) cells per mL every 14 days. Subjects randomized to HP802-247 will receive Vehicle on alternate weeks.
Study Dosage / Usage: 260 µL (130 µL, one spray, of each solution) containing 0.5 X 10(6th) cells per mL every 14 days.
Placebo Comparator: HP802-247 Vehicle plus compression therapy
fibrinogen solution & thrombin solution without cells. Subjects randomized to HP802-247 Vehicle will receive Vehicle weekly.
HP802-247 Vehicle consists of two separate components, a fibrinogen solution (Component 1) and a cell free thrombin solution which is identical to Component 2 except that no keratinocytes and no fibroblasts are present. A single dose is created when combined on the wound surface.
Other Names:
  • Placebo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Compare the Treatment Groups for the Number of Subjects With Complete Wound Closure Over the 12-Week Treatment Period From Baseline
Time Frame: Weekly, over 12 Weeks or until wound closure, which ever occurred first

For each treatment group the area of each subject's target ulcer was measured on a weekly basis, for up to 12 weeks, using a laser-based wound imaging system in conjunction with software to measure area. Following initial closure subjects returned for four weekly visits to confirm wound closure. Wounds that remained closed for four weeks were classified as confirmed closures; if a wound opened at any of the 4 visits it was not considered to have closed.

For subjects who dropped from the study prior to the end of treatment, their remaining visit values were imputed using LOCF; wound status of closed was not imputed.

Weekly, over 12 Weeks or until wound closure, which ever occurred first

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Compare the Efficacy of the Treatment Groups in Achieving Complete Wound Closure, Based on Time in Days to Closure Over the 12-Week Treatment Period From Baseline.
Time Frame: 12 Weeks
This key secondary outcome was based on a Cox Proportional Hazard Analysis.
12 Weeks
Compare the Efficacy of the Treatment Groups in Achieving Complete Wound Closure, Based on Median Time (Days) to Closure Over the 12-Week Treatment Period From Baseline.
Time Frame: 12 weeks
This key secondary outcome was based on a Kaplan-Meier Survival analysis.
12 weeks
Compare the Treatment Groups for the Proportion of Subjects With Wound Closure at Each of the 12-Week Treatment Period From Baseline
Time Frame: Weekly, over the 12 week treatment period, or until wound closure, which ever occurred first
For subjects who dropped from the study, their remaining visit values were imputed using LOCF. Treatment groups were compared for percentage of participants with closed wounds at each treatment visit.
Weekly, over the 12 week treatment period, or until wound closure, which ever occurred first
Number of Subjects With Durable Wound Healing Over the 3 Months Following Complete Wound Closure
Time Frame: Target ulcer status observed at two (visit 1) and three (visit 2) months following initial ulcer closure.
Subjects who completed the treatment period with confirmed wound closure were followed in the post-treatment period for a further two months to determine their closed wound status (remained closed/reopened), giving a measure of persistence of wound closure following completion of treatment.
Target ulcer status observed at two (visit 1) and three (visit 2) months following initial ulcer closure.
Change From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Wound at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment Weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and Weekly, over the 12 week treatment period
Target ulcer pain was measured using a Visual Analog Scale [Range: 0mm - 100mm]. Subjects marked their pain level on a 100 mm horizontal line, with a short vertical line across the scale, 0 denoting no pain and 100mm the maximum pain.
Baseline and Weekly, over the 12 week treatment period
Change From Baseline in Pain Associated With the Target Leg at Each of the 12 Double Blind Treatment Weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and Weekly, over the 12 week treatment period
Target leg pain were measured using a Visual Analog Scale [Range: 0mm - 100mm]. Subjects marked their pain level on a 100 mm horizontal line, with a short vertical line across the scale, 0 denoting no pain and 100mm the maximum pain.
Baseline and Weekly, over the 12 week treatment period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Herbert B. Slade, MD, Smith & Nephew, Inc.
  • Study Director: Tommy Lee, MSHS, Smith & Nephew, Inc.
  • Principal Investigator: Wolfgang Vanscheidt, Professor Dr, University Freiburg-Practice for Dermatology

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 8, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 10, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

May 15, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 3, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 19, 2016

Last Verified

September 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ulcer

Clinical Trials on HP802-247

3
Subscribe