Community-Acquired Pneumonia - Study on the Initial Treatment With Antibiotics of Lower Respiratory Tract Infections (CAP-START)

April 22, 2014 updated by: MJM Bonten, UMC Utrecht

Antibiotic Treatment of Community-acquired Pneumonia: a Prospective Comparison of Dutch Guideline Advices.

The purpose of this study is to compare the cost(effectiveness) of three existing antibiotic strategies for patients with community-acquired pneumonia admitted to the hospital, but not the ICU.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

2283

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Alkmaar, Netherlands
        • Medical Center Alkmaar
      • Amsterdam, Netherlands
        • AMC Amsterdam
      • Breda, Netherlands
        • Amphia Hospital Breda
      • Haarlem, Netherlands
        • Kennemer Gasthuis
      • Hoofddorp, Netherlands
        • Spaarne Hospital
      • Utrecht, Netherlands
        • UMC Utrecht
      • Utrecht, Netherlands
        • Diakonessenhuis Utrecht

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients admitted to one of the participating hospitals needing treatment for CAP, not being admitted to the ICU are eligible for study inclusion.
  • Admission is defined as hospital stay for more than 24 hours.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are readmitted with CAP within 2 weeks after a previous episode are not eligible.
  • Patients with cystic fibrosis are not eligible.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Betalactam monotherapy
Preferred empirical treatment for patients in this arm is Beta-lactam monotherapy e.g. co-amoxiclav or ceftriaxone
The investigators are using a cluster-randomized cross-over design for preferred empirical treatment. One of the 3 treatment arms is used as preferred empirical therapy during a period of 4 consecutive months, after which preferred treatment will rotate to 1 of the other 2 regimens. The order of change is randomised per hospital, thereby controlling for inter-hospital variables and minimizing seasonal influences.
Active Comparator: Betalactam combination with macrolide
Preferred empirical treatment for patients in this arm is beta-lactam combination therapy with a macrolide e.g. ceftriaxone and erythromycin
The investigators are using a cluster-randomized cross-over design for preferred empirical treatment. One of the 3 treatment arms is used as preferred empirical therapy during a period of 4 consecutive months, after which preferred treatment will rotate to 1 of the other 2 regimens. The order of change is randomised per hospital, thereby controlling for inter-hospital variables and minimizing seasonal influences.
Active Comparator: Quinolone monotherapy
Preferred empirical treatment for patients in this arm is quinolone monotherapy e.g. moxifloxacin or levofloxacin
The investigators are using a cluster-randomized cross-over design for preferred empirical treatment. One of the 3 treatment arms is used as preferred empirical therapy during a period of 4 consecutive months, after which preferred treatment will rotate to 1 of the other 2 regimens. The order of change is randomised per hospital, thereby controlling for inter-hospital variables and minimizing seasonal influences.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Day 90 Mortality
Time Frame: 90 days from admission
We will assess all-cause mortality on day 90 from admission from the municipal personal records database
90 days from admission

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Length of intravenous antibiotic treatment
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week
Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week
Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week
Tolerability
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week
Side-effects and complications from antibiotic therapy are registered from clinical record
Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week
Complications
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week
Complications of pneumonia during admission are registered from clinical record.
Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 1 week
Health care costs and non-health care costs
Time Frame: 28 days from admission
Health care costs and non-health care costs are assessed using a short questionnaire 28 days from admission
28 days from admission

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marc J. Bonten, MD PhD, UMC Utrecht

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 2, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

August 8, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 23, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 22, 2014

Last Verified

April 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 10-148
  • 80-82310-97-12044 (Other Grant/Funding Number: ZonMw)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Community-acquired Pneumonia

Clinical Trials on Preferred empirical treatment

3
Subscribe