Docetaxel +/- Suramin in 2nd Line Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

May 7, 2020 updated by: University of Wisconsin, Madison

Randomized Phase II Study of Suramin and Docetaxel Versus Docetaxel in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer After Failure of First-Line Chemotherapy

The overall purpose of the study is to determine whether or not the inclusion of suramin to standard treatment with docetaxel improves progression-free survival for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the second and third line settings.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The overall purpose of the study is to determine whether or not the inclusion of suramin to standard treatment with docetaxel improves progression-free survival for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the second and third line settings.

Secondary objectives include:

  • To compare response rate of patients in both treatment arms
  • To compare overall survival of patients in both treatment arms
  • To compare toxicity in both treatment arms
  • To determine whether the survival benefit from suramin is associated with reduced M-phase entry in peripheral blood lymphocytes

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Wisconsin
      • Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53792
        • University of Wisconsin Carbone Comprehensive Cancer Center
      • Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
        • Medical College of Wisconsin

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pathologically proven diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer
  • Documented disease progression after first-line chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer
  • Stable and treated CNS metastasis is allowed
  • Radiation must be completed at least 2 weeks prior to starting protocol treatment
  • Major surgery must be completed at least 4 weeks prior to starting protocol treatment
  • ECOG performance status 0-2
  • Sexually active patients must use adequate contraception
  • Adequate bone marrow function
  • Adequate renal function
  • Adequate liver function

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe hypersensitivity reaction to docetaxel
  • Pre-existing grade 3 or 4 neuropathy
  • Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Uncontrolled intercurrent illness
  • Receipt of 3 or more prior chemotherapy regimens

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Docetaxel
IV over 60 minutes, 75 mg/m2
Other Names:
  • Taxotere
IV over 60 minutes. 56 mg/m2
Other Names:
  • Taxotere
EXPERIMENTAL: Docetaxel plus Suramin
IV over 60 minutes, 75 mg/m2
Other Names:
  • Taxotere
IV over 60 minutes. 56 mg/m2
Other Names:
  • Taxotere
IV over 30 minutes

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression-free Survival in Months
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
Compare progression-free survival (PFS) in participants with advanced NSCLC treated with docetaxel with or without suramin after failure of first-line chemotherapy. PFS is defined as the duration of time from the time of randomization to time of disease progression or death, whichever occurs first.
Up to 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Response Rate Per RECIST 1.1 Criteria
Time Frame: Up to 1 year

Response rate per RECIST 1.1, as follows:

Complete response (CR): Disappearance of all extranodal target lesions. All pathological lymph nodes must have decreased to <10 mm in short axis Partial response (PR): At least 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameters (SLD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters Progressive disease (PD): SLD increased by at least 20% from the smallest value on study (including baseline, if that is smallest). The SLD must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. (Two lesions increasing from 2mm to 3mm, for example, does not qualify).

Stable disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR not sufficient increase to qualify for PD

Up to 1 year
Overall Survival
Time Frame: Up to 50 months
Compare overall survival of participants in both treatment arms.
Up to 50 months
Number of Participants With Toxicity/Adverse Events From Treatment
Time Frame: Up to 2 years
The investigators will compare the toxicity profiles of the two arms of therapy to determine if the docetaxel + suramin has a more favorable toxicity profile than docetaxel alone. This count includes only adverse events considered definitely, probably, or possibly due to treatment.
Up to 2 years
Evaluation of Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes for DNA Damage-induced Checkpoint Control.
Time Frame: Baseline
The investigators hypothesize that suramin in combination with docetaxel improves response rates and survival by increasing the cancer cell population in the M phase of the cell cycle. The G2-M checkpoint control score, defined as (%M-phase arrested cells after cisplatin+suramin)/(%M-phase arrested cells after cisplatin), is an indicator of the effect of suramin on cell accumulation in the M-phase. G2-M checkpoint control was evaluated as a predictor of PFS and OS in participant receiving suramin by linear correlation.
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Rafael Santana-Davila, MD, Medical College of Wisconsin

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2012

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

June 11, 2015

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

June 16, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 25, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 20, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

August 23, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 12, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 7, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Carcinoma, Non Small Cell Lung

Clinical Trials on Docetaxel

Subscribe