A PhaseI/IIa Study to Determine the Safety and Tolerability of MA09-hRPE Cells in Patients With Advanced Dry AMD

April 5, 2024 updated by: CHABiotech CO., Ltd

A Phase I/IIa, Open-Label, Single-Center, Prospective Study to Determine the Safety and Tolerability of Sub-retinal Transplantation of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Derived Retinal Pigmented Epithelial (MA09-hRPE) Cells in Patients With Advanced Dry Age-related Macular Degeneration(AMD)

To evaluate the safety and tolerability of MA09-hRPE cellular therapy in patients with advanced dry AMD To evaluate the safety of the surgical procedures when used to implant MA09-hRPE cells To assess the number of hRPE cells to be transplanted in future studies To evaluate on an exploratory basis potential efficacy endpoints to be used in future studies of MA09-hRPE cellular therapy.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Gyeonggi-do
      • Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea, Republic of, 463-712,
        • CHA Bundang Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

55 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult male or female over 55 years of age. Patient should be in sufficiently good health to reasonably expect survival for at least four years after treatment
  • Clinical findings consistent with advanced dry AMD
  • GA defined as attenuation or loss of RPE as observed by biomicroscopy, OCT, and FA.
  • No evidence of current or prior choroidal neovascularization in the treated eye
  • The visual acuity (BCVA) of the eye to receive the transplant found to be eligible for trial based on study protocol
  • Electrophysiological findings consistent with advanced dry AMD.
  • Medically suitable to undergo vitrectomy and subretinal injection.
  • Medically suitable for general anesthesia or waking sedation, if needed.
  • Medically suitable for transplantation of an embryonic stem cell line

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of active or inactive CNV in the eye to be treated.
  • Presence or history of retinal dystrophy, retinitis pigmentosa, chorioretinitis, central serious choroidopathy, diabetic retinopathy or other retinal vascular or degenerative disease other than ARMD.
  • History of optic neuropathy.
  • Macular atrophy due to causes other than AMD.
  • Presence of glaucomatous optic neuropathy in the study eye, uncontrolled IOP, or use of two or more agents to control IOP (acetazolamide, beta blocker, alpha-1-agonist, prostaglandins, anhydrous carbonic inhibitors)
  • Cataract of sufficient severity likely to necessitate surgical extraction within 1 year.
  • History of retinal detachment repair in the study eye.
  • History of myocardial infarction in previous 12 months.
  • History of diabetes mellitus.
  • History of cognitive impairments or dementia which may impact the patients ability participate in the informed consent process and to appropriately complete evaluations.
  • Any immunodeficiency.
  • Any abnormalities in laboratory test result.
  • Serologic evidence of infection with Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C, or HIV.
  • Current participation in any other clinical trial.
  • Participation within previous 6 months in any clinical trial of a drug by ocular or systemic administration.
  • Any other sight-threatening ocular disease.
  • Ocular lens removal within previous 3 months.
  • Ocular surgery in the study eye in the previous 3 months
  • If female, pregnancy or lactation.
  • Any other medical condition, which, in the Investigator's judgment, will interfere with the patient's ability to comply with the protocol, compromises patient safety, or interferes with the interpretation of the study results.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cohort 1
Biological: MA09-hRPE Cellular therapy Cohort 1 Dose 1
Transplantation of MA09-hRPE cells accoding to the assigned dose group
Experimental: Cohort 2
Biological: MA09-hRPE Cellular therapy Cohort 2 Dose 2
Transplantation of MA09-hRPE cells accoding to the assigned dose group
Experimental: Cohort 3
Biological: MA09-hRPE Cellular therapy Cohort 3 Dose 3
Transplantation of MA09-hRPE cells accoding to the assigned dose group
Experimental: Cohort 4
Biological: MA09-hRPE Cellular therapy Cohort 4 Dose 4
Transplantation of MA09-hRPE cells accoding to the assigned dose group

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety of hESC derived RPE cells
Time Frame: 12 months

The transplantation of hESC-derived RPE cells MA09-hRPE will be considered safe in the absence of:

  1. Any grade 2 (NCI grading system) or greater adverse event related to the cell product
  2. Any evidence that the cells are contaminated with an infectious agent
  3. Any evidence that the cells show tumorigenic potential
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
exploratory evaluations for potential efficacy endpoints
Time Frame: 12months

Secondary endpoints will be evaluated as exploratory evaluations for potential efficacy endpoints.

  • Change in the mean of BCVA
  • Autofluorescense photography
  • Reading speed

Evidence of successful engraftment will consist of:

  • Structural evidence (OCT imaging, fluorescein angiography, slitlamp examination with fundus photography) that cells have been implanted in the correct location
  • Electroretinographic evidence (mfERG) showing enhanced activity in the implant location
12months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Yeong je Seong, CHA Bundang Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 22, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 27, 2012

First Posted (Estimated)

August 29, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 9, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CHA CTP 1101

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dry Age Related Macular Degeneration

Clinical Trials on MA09-hRPE

Subscribe