- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01709513
Study of Alirocumab (REGN727/SAR236553) in Patients With Primary Hypercholesterolemia and Moderate, High, or Very High Cardiovascular (CV) Risk, Who Are Intolerant to Statins (ODYSSEY ALTERNATIVE)
June 10, 2020 updated by: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Active-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of REGN727/SAR236553 in Patients With Primary Hypercholesterolemia Who Are Intolerant to Statins
This is a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, parallel-group, multi-national, multi-center study to compare alirocumab (REGN727/SAR236553) versus ezetimibe in participants with primary hypercholesterolemia and moderate, high, or very high CV risk, who are intolerant to statins.
An atorvastatin arm is added to determine that the population selected in the study is a truly statin intolerant population by assessing skeletal muscle-related adverse events.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
314
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Feldkirch, Austria
-
Graz, Austria
-
Innsbruck, Austria
-
-
-
-
Quebec
-
Chicoutimi, Quebec, Canada
-
Montreal (2 locations), Quebec, Canada
-
Sainte-Foy, Quebec, Canada
-
-
-
-
-
Bron, France
-
Dijon, France
-
Lille, France
-
Paris, France
-
Saint-Herblain, France
-
Venissieux, France
-
-
-
-
-
Holon, Israel
-
Jerusalem, Israel
-
Ofakim, Israel
-
Safed, Israel
-
Tel-Hashomer, Israel
-
-
-
-
-
Cinisello Balsamo, Italy
-
Napoli, Italy
-
Palermo, Italy
-
Roma, Italy
-
-
-
-
-
Oslo (2 Locations), Norway
-
-
-
-
-
Burton-on-Trent, United Kingdom
-
Chesterfield, United Kingdom
-
Isle Of White, United Kingdom
-
Londonderry/N. Ireland, United Kingdom
-
Peterborough, United Kingdom
-
Salford, United Kingdom
-
Stevenage, United Kingdom
-
-
-
-
California
-
Anaheim, California, United States
-
Beverly Hills, California, United States
-
Mission Viejo, California, United States
-
Newport Beach, California, United States
-
Northridge, California, United States
-
Thousand Oaks, California, United States
-
-
Connecticut
-
Hartford, Connecticut, United States
-
-
Florida
-
Boynton Beach, Florida, United States
-
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
-
Lakeland, Florida, United States
-
Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States
-
Sarasota, Florida, United States
-
Tampa, Florida, United States
-
Trinity, Florida, United States
-
-
Illinois
-
Addison, Illinois, United States
-
Chicago, Illinois, United States
-
-
Indiana
-
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
-
-
Kansas
-
Kansas City, Kansas, United States
-
-
Maine
-
Auburn, Maine, United States
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
-
-
Minnesota
-
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
-
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
-
-
Missouri
-
Saint Louis, Missouri, United States
-
-
New Jersey
-
Clifton, New Jersey, United States
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States
-
Poughkeepsie, New York, United States
-
-
North Carolina
-
Durham, North Carolina, United States
-
-
Ohio
-
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
-
Marion, Ohio, United States
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Danville, Pennsylvania, United States
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
-
Port Matilda, Pennsylvania, United States
-
Scranton, Pennsylvania, United States
-
Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, United States
-
-
South Carolina
-
Summerville, South Carolina, United States
-
-
Tennessee
-
Kingsport, Tennessee, United States
-
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
-
-
Texas
-
Dallas, Texas, United States
-
Fort Worth, Texas, United States
-
-
Utah
-
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
-
-
Virginia
-
Richmond, Virginia, United States
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion:
- Patients with primary hypercholesterolemia [Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia (heFH) or non-FH] with moderate, high or very high CV risk and a history of statin intolerance
- Provide signed informed consent
Exclusion:
- Calculated serum LDL-C <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) and very high CV risk at the screening visit
- Calculated serum LDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) and high or moderate CV risk at the screening visit
- A 10-year fatal cardiovascular disease risk score <1% at the screening visit
(The inclusion/ exclusion criteria provided above is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a patient's potential participation in this clinical trial).
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Other: Atorvastatin (statin rechallenge arm)
Atorvastatin 20 mg over-encapsulated tablets orally once daily (QD) for 24 weeks and placebo (for alirocumab) subcutaneous (SC) injection every two weeks (Q2W) for 24 weeks added to stable lipid-modifying therapy (LMT).
|
Atorvastatin over-encapsulated tablets.
Placebo for alirocumab, ezitimibe and atorvastatin.
|
Active Comparator: Ezetimibe
Ezetimibe 10 mg over-encapsulated tablets orally QD for 24 weeks and placebo (for alirocumab) SC injection Q2W for 24 weeks added to stable LMT.
|
Placebo for alirocumab, ezitimibe and atorvastatin.
Ezetimibe over-encapsulated tablet.
Other Names:
|
Experimental: Alirocumab 75 mg/ up to 150 mg
Alirocumab 75 mg SC injection Q2W for 24 weeks and placebo (for atorvastatin/ezetimibe) over-encapsulated tablets orally QD for 24 weeks added to stable LMT.
Alirocumab dose up-titrated to 150 mg Q2W from Week 12 when LDL-C levels ≥70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) or ≥100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) at Week 8, based on cardiovascular risk.
|
Placebo for alirocumab, ezitimibe and atorvastatin.
Alirocumab SC injection of 1 mL into the abdomen, thigh, or outer area of the upper arm.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 24 - Intent--To-Treat (ITT) Analysis
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 24
|
Calculated LDL-C values were obtained from Friedewald formula.
Adjusted Least-squares (LS) means and standard errors at Week 24 were obtained from a mixed-effect model with repeated measures (MMRM) to account for missing data.
All available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment were used in the model (ITT analysis).
|
From Baseline to Week 24
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 24 - ITT Analysis
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 24
|
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.
|
From Baseline to Week 24
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at Week 12 - ITT Analysis
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 12
|
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.
|
From Baseline to Week 12
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Total-C at Week 12 - ITT Analysis
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 12
|
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.
|
From Baseline to Week 12
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Apo A-1 at Week 24 - ITT Analysis
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 24
|
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.
|
From Baseline to Week 24
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 24 - On--Treatment Analysis
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 24
|
Calculated LDL-C values were obtained from Friedewald formula.
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 were obtained from MMRM model including available post-baseline on-treatment data from Week 4 to Week 24 (i.e. up to 21 days after last injection or 3 days after the last capsule, whichever came first) (on-treatment analysis).
|
From Baseline to Week 24
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL--C at Week 12 -- ITT Analysis
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 12
|
Calculated LDL-C values were obtained from Friedewald formula.
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.
|
From Baseline to Week 12
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 12 - On--Treatment Analysis
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 12
|
Calculated LDL-C values were obtained from Friedewald formula.
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 were obtained from MMRM model including available post-baseline on-treatment data from Week 4 to Week 24 (i.e. up to 21 days after last injection or 3 days after the last capsule, whichever came first) (on-treatment analysis).
|
From Baseline to Week 12
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein (Apo) B at Week 24 -- ITT Analysis
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 24
|
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including all available post--baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.
|
From Baseline to Week 24
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Apo B at Week 24 -- On--Treatment Analysis
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 24
|
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 were obtained from MMRM model including available post-baseline on-treatment data from Week 4 to Week 24 (i.e. up to 21 days after last injection or 3 days after the last capsule, whichever came first).
|
From Baseline to Week 24
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Non--High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at Week 24 -- ITT Analysis
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 24
|
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.
|
From Baseline to Week 24
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Non--HDL-C at Week 24 -- On--Treatment Analysis
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 24
|
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 were obtained from MMRM model including available post-baseline on-treatment data from Week 4 to Week 24 (i.e. up to 21 days after last injection or 3 days after the last capsule, whichever came first).
|
From Baseline to Week 24
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (Total--C) at Week 24 - ITT Analysis
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 24
|
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.
|
From Baseline to Week 24
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Apo B at Week 12 -- ITT Analysis
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 12
|
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.
|
From Baseline to Week 12
|
Percentage of Very High CV Risk Participants Reaching Calculated LDL-C <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) or Moderate or High CV Risk Participants Reaching Calculated LDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) at Week 24 - ITT Analysis
Time Frame: Up to Week 24
|
Adjusted percentages at Week 24 were obtained from a multiple imputation approach model for handling of missing data.
All available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment were included in the imputation model (ITT analysis).
|
Up to Week 24
|
Percentage of Very High CV Risk Participants Reaching Calculated LDL-C <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) or Moderate or High CV Risk Participants Reaching Calculated LDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) at Week 24 - On-Treatment Analysis
Time Frame: Up to Week 24
|
Adjusted percentages at Week 24 were obtained from a multiple imputation approach model including available post-baseline on-treatment data from Week 4 to Week 24 i.e. up to 21 days after last injection or 3 days after the last capsule, whichever came first (on-treatment analysis).
|
Up to Week 24
|
Percentage of Participants Reaching Calculated LDL-C <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 24 - ITT Analysis
Time Frame: Up to Week 24
|
Adjusted percentages at Week 24 were obtained from a multiple imputation approach model for handling of missing data.
All available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment were included in the imputation model (ITT analysis).
|
Up to Week 24
|
Percentage of Participants Reaching Calculated LDL-C <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 24 - On-Treatment Analysis
Time Frame: Up to Week 24
|
Adjusted percentages at Week 24 were obtained from a multiple imputation approach model including available post-baseline on-treatment data from Week 4 to Week 24 i.e. up to 21 days after last injection or 3 days after the last capsule, whichever came first (on-treatment analysis).
|
Up to Week 24
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 24 - ITT Analysis
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 24
|
Combined Estimate for Adjusted Mean (Standard Error) at Week 24 from multiple imputation followed by robust regression including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on or off-treatment.
|
From Baseline to Week 24
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides at Week 24 - ITT Analysis
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 24
|
Combined Estimate for Adjusted Mean (Standard Error) at Week 24 from multiple imputation followed by robust regression including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on or off-treatment.
|
From Baseline to Week 24
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein(a) at Week 12 -- ITT Analysis
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 12
|
Combined Estimate for Adjusted Mean (Standard Error) at Week 24 from multiple imputation followed by robust regression including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on or off-treatment.
|
From Baseline to Week 12
|
Percent Change in HDL-C From Baseline to Week 12 -- ITT Analysis
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 12
|
Least-squares (LS) means and standard errors (SE) taken from MMRM (mixed-effect model with repeated measures) analysis
|
From Baseline to Week 12
|
Percent Change in Fasting Triglycerides From Baseline to Week 12 -- ITT Analysis
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 12
|
Combined Estimate for Adjusted Mean (Standard Error) at Week 24 from multiple imputation followed by robust regression including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on or off-treatment.
|
From Baseline to Week 12
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Apo A--1 at Week 12 -- ITT Analysis
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 12
|
Least squares (LS) means and standard errors (SE) taken from MMRM (mixed effect model with repeated measures) analysis.
|
From Baseline to Week 12
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Skeletal Muscle-related Adverse Event (AE)
Time Frame: From Baseline up to Week 24
|
Skeletal muscle-related adverse events were a predefined category including myalgia, muscle spasms, muscular weakness, musculoskeletal stiffness and muscle fatigue.
Events that developed during treatment emergent adverse events period (the time from the first double-blindstudy treatment [injection or capsules, whichever came first] up to the day of the last double-blind injection + 70 days ) are reported.
|
From Baseline up to Week 24
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 24 Versus Atorvastatin - Raw Data Description - Intent-To-Treat (ITT) Analysis
Time Frame: From Baseline up to Week 24
|
From Baseline up to Week 24
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Mahmood T, Minnier J, Ito MK, Li QH, Koren A, Kam IW, Fazio S, Shapiro MD. Discordant responses of plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and lipoprotein(a) to alirocumab: A pooled analysis from 10 ODYSSEY Phase 3 studies. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2021 Jul 23;28(8):816-822. doi: 10.1177/2047487320915803. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
- Leiter LA, Tinahones FJ, Karalis DG, Bujas-Bobanovic M, Letierce A, Mandel J, Samuel R, Jones PH. Alirocumab safety in people with and without diabetes mellitus: pooled data from 14 ODYSSEY trials. Diabet Med. 2018 Dec;35(12):1742-1751. doi: 10.1111/dme.13817. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
- Defesche JC, Stefanutti C, Langslet G, Hopkins PN, Seiz W, Baccara-Dinet MT, Hamon SC, Banerjee P, Kastelein JJP. Efficacy of alirocumab in 1191 patients with a wide spectrum of mutations in genes causative for familial hypercholesterolemia. J Clin Lipidol. 2017 Nov-Dec;11(6):1338-1346.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2017.08.016. Epub 2017 Sep 4. Erratum In: J Clin Lipidol. 2020 Sep - Oct;14(5):742.
- Ray KK, Ginsberg HN, Davidson MH, Pordy R, Bessac L, Minini P, Eckel RH, Cannon CP. Reductions in Atherogenic Lipids and Major Cardiovascular Events: A Pooled Analysis of 10 ODYSSEY Trials Comparing Alirocumab With Control. Circulation. 2016 Dec 13;134(24):1931-1943. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024604. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
- Moriarty PM, Jacobson TA, Bruckert E, Thompson PD, Guyton JR, Baccara-Dinet MT, Gipe D. Efficacy and safety of alirocumab, a monoclonal antibody to PCSK9, in statin-intolerant patients: design and rationale of ODYSSEY ALTERNATIVE, a randomized phase 3 trial. J Clin Lipidol. 2014 Nov-Dec;8(6):554-561. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2014.09.007. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
- Moriarty PM, Thompson PD, Cannon CP, Guyton JR, Bergeron J, Zieve FJ, Bruckert E, Jacobson TA, Kopecky SL, Baccara-Dinet MT, Du Y, Pordy R, Gipe DA; ODYSSEY ALTERNATIVE Investigators. Efficacy and safety of alirocumab vs ezetimibe in statin-intolerant patients, with a statin rechallenge arm: The ODYSSEY ALTERNATIVE randomized trial. J Clin Lipidol. 2015 Nov-Dec;9(6):758-769. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2015.08.006. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
- Moriarty PM, Thompson PD, Cannon CP, Guyton JR, Bergeron J, Zieve FJ, Bruckert E, Jacobson TA, Baccara-Dinet MT, Zhao J, Donahue S, Ali S, Manvelian G, Pordy R. Efficacy and safety of alirocumab in statin-intolerant patients over 3 years: open-label treatment period of the ODYSSEY ALTERNATIVE trial. J Clin Lipidol. 2020 Jan-Feb;14(1):88-97.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2020.01.001. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
September 30, 2012
Primary Completion (Actual)
May 31, 2014
Study Completion (Actual)
May 31, 2017
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
October 8, 2012
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 16, 2012
First Posted (Estimate)
October 18, 2012
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
June 23, 2020
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 10, 2020
Last Verified
June 1, 2020
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Metabolic Diseases
- Lipid Metabolism Disorders
- Hyperlipidemias
- Dyslipidemias
- Hypercholesterolemia
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Enzyme Inhibitors
- Antimetabolites
- Anticholesteremic Agents
- Hypolipidemic Agents
- Lipid Regulating Agents
- Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
- Atorvastatin
- Ezetimibe
Other Study ID Numbers
- R727-CL-1119
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Hypercholesterolemia
-
National Medical Research Center for Therapy and...Moscow State University of Medicine and DentistryRecruitingMedication Adherence | Adherence, Medication | Treatment Adherence | Familial Hypercholesterolemia | Motivational Interviewing | Adherence, Patient | Treatment Adherence and Compliance | Patient Compliance | Adherence | Hypercholesterolemia, Familial | Patient Adherence | Hypercholesterolemia, Autosomal Dominant and other conditionsRussian Federation
-
Direct PlantesUnknownHYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIAFrance
-
Chong Kun Dang PharmaceuticalRecruitingPrimary HypercholesterolemiaKorea, Republic of
-
Addpharma Inc.CompletedPrimary HypercholesterolemiaKorea, Republic of
-
JW PharmaceuticalCompletedPrimary HypercholesterolemiaKorea, Republic of
-
Hanmi Pharmaceutical Company LimitedCompletedPrimary HypercholesterolemiaKorea, Republic of
-
Provident Clinical ResearchGlaxoSmithKlineUnknownPrimary HypercholesterolemiaUnited States
-
Organon and CoCompletedPrimary Hypercholesterolemia | Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia
-
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLCTerminated
-
Danone JapanCompletedHealthy | Mild HypercholesterolemiaJapan
Clinical Trials on Atorvastatin
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Korea, Republic of, Malaysia, Philippines, Thailand, Russian Federation, Mexico
-
Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching HospitalOpen PhilanthropyRecruitingTuberculosis | Pulmonary Tuberculosis | Koch's DiseaseNigeria
-
Organon and CoCompleted
-
Hippocration General HospitalCompletedCoronary Artery Disease | Atherosclerosis | Endothelial Dysfunction | Oxidative Stress | HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitor ToxicityGreece
-
Organon and CoCompleted
-
Zhejiang Hisun Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.Unknown
-
Seoul National University HospitalDong-A PharmaceuticalCompletedCardiovascular Disease | Dyslipidemia | HypercholesterolemiaKorea, Republic of
-
PfizerCompletedHypertriglyceridemia | Hyperlipoproteinemia Type IVUnited States, Canada
-
Hanmi Pharmaceutical Company LimitedCompletedHypertension | HyperlipidemiaKorea, Republic of