Does Tranexamic Acid Reduce the Need for Blood Transfusions in Patients Undergoing Hip Fracture Surgery?

November 12, 2018 updated by: Mark Pagnano, Mayo Clinic

Is Tranexamic Acid Effective in Limiting Transfusion After Hip Replacement for Femoral Neck Fracture: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Does tranexamic acid improve the perioperative care of those patients treated surgically for hip fracture by decreasing the proportion of patients requiring transfusion and decreasing total perioperative bleeding.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Antifibrinolytic medications such as tranexamic acid, aprotinin, and aminocaproic acid have proven to be useful in decreasing blood loss and the proportion of patients who require transfusion after a number of surgical procedures. In orthopedic surgery, tranexamic acid (TXA) is the best studied of these medications and a recent Cochrane Database review determined that tranexamic acid was effective in decreasing perioperative bleeding and post-operative transfusion after elective hip replacement and knee replacement surgery. At Mayo Clinic Rochester, the routine administration of tranexamic acid has evolved over the past decade to become part of the typical protocol for more than 3,000 elective hip and knee replacement procedures each year. Recent administrative data provides fairly compelling evidence of the efficacy of tranexamic acid in decreasing transfusion at the Mayo Clinic Rochester practice with 2010 data showing 2% and 7% prevalence of transfusion in patients treated with tranexamic acid versus 18% and 33% prevalence in those knee and hip replacement patients, respectively, who were not treated with tranexamic acid. A recent analysis of the Mayo Clinic Rochester orthopedic practice showed that patients treated for hip fracture remain at substantial risk of perioperative transfusion (30% prevalence) after operative management. This raises the question as to whether tranexamic acid could improve the perioperative care of those patients treated surgically for hip fracture by decreasing the proportion of patients requiring transfusion and decreasing total perioperative bleeding.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

138

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Mayo Clinic in Rochester

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria

  • AO/OTA (Orthopedic Trauma Association) fracture classification 31B
  • Surgically treated with either hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty
  • Acute fracture treated within 72 hours of injury
  • Low energy isolated injury
  • Age greater than 18 years old

Exclusion Criteria

  • Transfusion received during admission, prior to surgery
  • Creatinine clearance less than 30 mL/min
  • History of unprovoked Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) and/or recurrent VTE
  • Known history of Factor V Leiden, protein C/S deficiency, prothrombin gene mutation, anti-thrombin deficiency, anti-phospholipid antibody syndrome, lupus anticoagulant
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding (pregnancy tests will be performed on all patients of child-bearing potential)
  • History of cerebrovascular accident (CVA), Myocardial infarction (MI), or VTE within the previous 30 days
  • Coronary stent placement within the previous 6 months
  • Disseminated intravascular coagulation
  • Subarachnoid hemorrhage

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: placebo
Normal saline will be administered intravenously in two doses of 15 mg/kg each administered over a period of ten minutes, one dose just prior to incision and the second at initiation of wound closure.
A similar dose of 0.9% sodium chloride (NaCL) will be administered intravenously in two doses over a ten minute period, one dose at incision and the other at initiation of wound closure.
Active Comparator: tranexamic acid
Tranexamic acid will be administered intravenously in two doses of 15 mg/kg each administered over a period of ten minutes, one dose just prior to incision and the second at initiation of wound closure.
Tranexamic acid will be administered intravenously in two doses of 15 mg/kg. Each dose will be administered over a period of ten minutes, one dose just prior to incision and the second at initiation of wound closure.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Who Received a Hospitalization Transfusion
Time Frame: 5 days
Proportion of patients transfused at least 1 unit of packed red blood cells during hospital admission
5 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Number of Units Transfused
Time Frame: 5 days
Mean number of units transfused per patient
5 days
Calculated Blood Loss
Time Frame: 5 days
Calculated blood loss
5 days
Number of Participants With Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Diagnosis
Time Frame: Within 6 months of surgery
Incidence of symptomatic VTE diagnosed within 6 months of surgery
Within 6 months of surgery
Number of Participants With Wound Complications
Time Frame: Within 6 months of surgery
Wound complications diagnosed within 6 months of surgery
Within 6 months of surgery
Number of Participants With Myocardial Infarction (MI) Diagnosis
Time Frame: Within 6 months of surgery
MI diagnosed within 6 months of surgery
Within 6 months of surgery
Number of Participants With Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA) Diagnosis
Time Frame: Within 6 months of surgery
CVA diagnosed within 6 months of surgery
Within 6 months of surgery
Number of Participants Who Died
Time Frame: 6 months after surgery
All-cause mortality at 6 months
6 months after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mark Pagnano, MD, Mayo Clinic

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 23, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 23, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

October 25, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 14, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 12, 2018

Last Verified

November 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hip Fracture

Clinical Trials on placebo

3
Subscribe