Drug Effects on Preference and Reward

September 4, 2013 updated by: University of Chicago
Classical conditioning is widely used to study motivational properties of addictive drugs in animals, but has rarely been used in humans. Here, we are establishing a procedure suitable for studying the neurobiology and individual determinants of classical conditioning in humans. Healthy volunteers are randomly assigned to four groups that received methamphetamine or placebo in the presence of distinctive environmental cues under paired or unpaired conditions. During each session, subjects perform tasks known to activate the ventral striatum in fMRI studies. The tasks are performed in the presence of a distinctive context, consisting of a screen background image of a beach or of mountains, accompanied by corresponding sounds. Separate groups of subjects carry out the tasks under high or low reward conditions. Within each of the two reward conditions, one group (paired), receives methamphetamine (20 mg, oral) or placebo consistently associated with one of the contexts, while the other (unpaired) receives drug or placebo unrelated to context. A fifth group (paired) perform the tasks with contextual cues but in the absence of monetary incentives. Before and after conditioning, participants carry out a series of forced choice tasks, and change of preference over time was analyzed.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Subjects are assigned to one of 5 groups: Paired, high reward (PairHi; n=24); Paired, low reward (PairLo; n=24); Paired no reward (PairNone; n=23); Unpaired, high reward (UnpHi; n=7); and Unpaired, low-reward (UnpLo; n=9). Each participant attends an orientation session, followed by four 4h conditioning sessions separated by at least 48h, and a 2h test session. During the initial orientation session, subjects practice the computer tasks together with the environmental stimuli to be paired during the conditioning sessions, and carry out a series of choices for the tasks and images (see below). All subjects receive methamphetamine (20 mg) on two conditioning sessions and placebo on the other two sessions, administered under double-blind conditions. Subjects differ in whether environmental stimuli are consistently paired with the drug administration. The three paired groups consistently receive drug and placebo in combination with one of the two sets of visual and auditory background stimuli (see below). The two unpaired groups receive each treatment in combination with one of the stimuli sets on one session, and the other on the other.

During all four conditioning sessions, subjects perform a series of computer tasks. Depending on group assignment, subjects are able to earn high ( PairHi, UnpHi) or low monetary reward ( PairLo, UnpLo), but this is not contingent on subjects' performance. Each run for each game begins with a credit to prevent a negative outcome early in the run. The PairNone group play the same games without monetary reward. The order of the three games and the background images used are randomized across subjects, but remain constant within subjects.

Tasks are presented in the presence of the two distinctive compound stimuli consisting of a background screen visible behind the task presentation and accompanied by a corresponding sound. One set of stimuli depicts a summer beach view accompanied by the sound of ocean waves. The other depicts summer alpine scenery accompanied by birdsong.

The primary outcome measure is the change in preference ratings for the study stimuli, from before to after conditioning. This is a behavioral study, designed to develop a novel procedure for future imaging studies.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

103

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60637
        • University of Chicago

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 35 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

healthy adults

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18-35, good healthy, normal weight, high school education, normal electrocardiogram, no psychiatric disorders,

Exclusion Criteria:

  • current medications, night shift work, abnormal electrocardiogram, medical problems

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Pairing group
Paired, high reward, oral methamphetamine (20 mg) vs placebo Paired, low reward, oral methamphetamine (20 mg) vs placebo Paired, no reward, oral methamphetamine (20 mg) vs placebo Unpaired, oral methamphetamine (20 mg) vs placebo
20 mg methamphetamine or placebo on four 4-hour laboratory sessions
Other Names:
  • Paired, unpaired
  • Low, high or no reward

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Preference for paired stimulus
Time Frame: 2-3 weeks
Subjects rate their preference for several pairs of stimuli before and after conditioning pairings. The stimuli are presented on a computer screen in the pre and post preference tests, and the change in preference after the conditioning trials is the primary outcome measure.
2-3 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subjective responses to methamphetamine
Time Frame: 2-3 weeks
Subjects complete standardized mood questionnaires after receiving methamphetamine or placebo on each of the four conditioning trials. Blood pressure and heart rate are also measured at these times.
2-3 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 29, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 2, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

November 6, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 5, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 4, 2013

Last Verified

November 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 10-618A
  • R01DA002812 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • HHSN275201100328P (Other Identifier: NIAAA)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Drug Addiction

Clinical Trials on Pairing condition

Subscribe