Propofol Versus Sevoflurane Recovery After Gynecological Surgery

February 18, 2016 updated by: Gildasio De Oliveira, Northwestern University

The Effects of Propofol vs. Sevoflurane Administered During Anesthesia Maintenance on Early and Late Recovery After Gynecological Surgery

80% of 25 million American who undergo surgery describe moderate to severe pain. The use of multimodal analgesic techniques can attenuate patient's postoperative pain and several different medication have been found to be effective. Pain can significantly affect patient's quality of recovery after surgery. Volatile anesthetics can increase sensitivity to pain at the low concentrations present on emergence from anesthesia. Propofol may have analgesic effect at sedative doses. The effects of propofol,when used for anesthesia maintenance, on postoperative pain have demonstrated controversial results with some investigators showing a potential benefit whereas others have not shown any benefit. Propofol for maintenance of anesthesia has been advocated as an strategy for high risk patients even though it has shown controversial results on reduction of Post operative nausea and vomiting. A comparison of propofol vs.volatile anesthetic in regards to the time required by patients to meet discharge criteria has also shown conflicting results.The QOR 40 is a validated instrument that has been specifically developed to evaluate patients recovery after anesthesia and surgery.

The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of maintenance of anesthesia with two agents (Propofol and Sevoflurane) on quality of recovery after ambulatory surgery

Significance: the results of this study can lead to the discovery of an anesthesia technique that is associated with a better recovery for patients after ambulatory surgery.

Research question is: do patients anesthetized with propofol have a better quality of recovery after ambulatory anesthesia than patients anesthetized with Sevoflurane? The hypothesis: patients anesthetized with propofol will have better quality of recovery than patients anesthetized with Sevoflurane after ambulatory surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Subjects will be recruited up to the day of surgery. 90 subjects will be randomly allocated into 2 groups, using a computer generated table of random numbers: anesthetic maintenance with Sevoflurane or anesthetic maintenance with Propofol . Subjects will be premedicated with intravenous (IV) midazolam 0.04 mg/kg. Routine ASA monitors will be applied. Anesthesia will be induced with remifentanil infusion started at 0.1 mcg/kg/minute titrated to keep blood pressure within 20% of the baseline and propofol 1.0 -2.0 mg/kg or sevoflurane induction. Tracheal intubation will be facilitated with rocuronium (0.6 mg/kg) or succinylcholine (1-2mg /kg). Anesthesia will be maintained with Sevoflurane or a Propofol infusion titrated to keep a bispectral index between 40-60, remifentanil infusion started at 0.1mcg/kg/min titrated to keep blood pressure within 20 % of baseline values, and rocuronium that will be administered at the discretion of the anesthesiologist. Upon termination of the surgery, neuromuscular blockade will be antagonized with a combination of neostigmine 0.05mg/kg and glycopyrrolate 0.01 mg/kg. Subjects will also receive Ketorolac 30 mg IV after discontinuation of remifentanil for postoperative pain control. Ondansetron 4 mg IV will be administered to decrease postoperative nausea and vomiting. Subjects will receive IV hydromorphone 0.4 mg q 5 minutes as needed to achieve a verbal rating score for pain <4 out of 10.They will also receive reglan 10 mg IV as a rescue antiemetic, if not effective, a second dose of Zofran 4 mg IV will be given in PACU. 24 hours after surgery a QOR 40 will be administered to the patient by one of the investigators. The primary and secondary outcomes will be assessed by an independent observer who will be blinded to group allocation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

90

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Prentice Women's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 64 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women
  • Age 18-64
  • Patients undergoing ambulatory surgery
  • ASA PS I, II

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic opioid use
  • Pregnant patient

Drop Out : patient or surgeon request

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Sevoflurane
Sevoflurane administered by inhalation (laryngeal mask airway or endotracheal tube)
Drug: Sevoflurane
Sevfoflurane inhaled administered by laryngeal mask airway or endotracheal tube
Other Names:
  • Sevoflurane,Ultane
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Propofol
Propofol administered via intravenous catheter at an initial rate of 1.0 -2.0 mg/kg then the Propofol infusion rate will be titrated to keep a bispectral index between 40-60
Drug: Propofol
Propofol administered via intravenous catheter at an initial rate of 1.0 -2.0 mg/kg then the Propofol infusion rate will be titrated to keep a bispectral index between 40-60
Other Names:
  • Propofol,Diprivan

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of Recovery Score 24 Hours Post Operative
Time Frame: 24 hours after the surgical procedure
Quality of recovery score 24 hours after the surgical procedure.Score of 40 is poor recovery and a score of 200 is good recovery.
24 hours after the surgical procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mg of Morphine Equivalents (IV)
Time Frame: PACU admission to discharge
Total opioid use in the post operative care unit (Mg of morphine equivalents)
PACU admission to discharge
Pain in Post Anesthesia Care Unit
Time Frame: Time in the post anesthesia care unit

Numeric rating scale for pain on a scale of 0-10 (0 is no pain and 10 is high pain) versus time curve in the post anesthesia care unit ( score * min). A higher value indicates more pain and time in the Post Anesthesia Care Unit.

The range is 0 pain to x time in minutes x 1 hour to 5 hour ( 60-300 minutes) . The pain scores were collected at 15 minute intervals from the time of admission to the PACU. The area under the NRS pain scale versus time curve was calculated using the trapezoidal method as an indicator of pain burden during early recovery (Graph Pad Prism ver 5.03, Graph Pad Software INC.
Time in the post anesthesia care unit
Opioid Use Discharge From Post Anesthesia Care Unit to 24 Hours After PACU Discharge.
Time Frame: Discharge from PACU to 24 hours post operative after PACU discharge.
Opioid use in mg of morphine equivalents from discharge from the post anesthesia care unit to 24 hours after PACU discharge.
Discharge from PACU to 24 hours post operative after PACU discharge.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Northwestern University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2012

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

April 1, 2014

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

April 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 18, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

December 24, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

March 14, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 18, 2016

Last Verified

February 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STU00070833

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Surgery

Clinical Trials on Sevoflurane

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Gabon

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe