Efficacy and Safety of Ranibizumab 0.5 mg Administered as Two Alternative Dosing Regimens in Chinese Patients With nAMD (Age Related Macular Degeneration) (DRAGON)

August 21, 2019 updated by: Novartis Pharmaceuticals

A 24-month, Randomized, Double-masked, Controlled, Multicenter Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Ranibizumab 0.5 mg Administered as Two Alternative Dosing Regimens in Chinese Patients With Neovascular Age Related Macular Degeneration (AMD)

The study evaluated the efficacy and safety of two different dosing regimens of ranibizumab (either monthly injections or injections as-needed based on the stability of a patient's vision) in Chinese patients with wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD) . This study was to provide long-term safety data in the treatment of Chinese patients with wet AMD.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

332

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Beijing, China, 100044
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Beijing, China, 100176
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Chongqing, China, 400038
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Shanghai, China, 200031
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Shanghai, China, 200080
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Shanghai, China, 200092
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100730
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100191
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Chongqing
      • Chongqing City, Chongqing, China, 400042
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Gansu
      • Lanzhou, Gansu, China, 730030
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Heilongjiang
      • Harbin, Heilongjiang, China, 150001
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Hubei
      • Wuhan, Hubei, China, 430060
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Wuhan, Hubei, China, 430070
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Hunan
      • Changsha City, Hunan, China, 410011
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Jiangsu
      • Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 210029
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Jiangxi
      • Nanchang, Jiangxi, China, 330006
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Liaoning
      • Shenyang, Liaoning, China, 110011
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Shandong
      • Qingdao, Shandong, China, 2666000
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Shanxi
      • Taiyuan, Shanxi, China, 030002
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Sichuan
      • Chengdu, Sichuan, China, 610041
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Tianjin
      • Tianjin, Tianjin, China, 300020
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Tianjin, Tianjin, China, 300070
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Zhejiang
      • Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China, 325027
        • Novartis Investigative Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Key Inclusion criteria:

  • Patients with visual impairment due to neovascular AMD
  • A qualifying vision score at study entry Key Exclusion criteria
  • Active infection or inflammation either eye at study entry
  • Uncontrolled glaucoma in either eye
  • Any disorder in the study eye which may affect vision
  • Use of any systemic anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-drugs within 3 months prior to study entry
  • Previous treatment of the study eye for wet AMD
  • Any surgery in the study eye 3 months prior to or planned with 6 month after study entry

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Ranibizumab 0.5 mg monthly
Monthly intravitreal injections of ranibizumab 0.5 mg in the core treatment period and PRN intravitreal injections of the same dose guided by best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) stabilization in the extension treatment period
Intravitreal injections of 0.5 mg Ranibizumab
EXPERIMENTAL: Ranibizumab 0.5 mg pro re nata (PRN)
PRN intravitreal injections of ranibizumab 0.5 mg guided by best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) stabilization in the 23 month treatment period
Intravitreal injections of 0.5 mg Ranibizumab

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Average Change in Visual Acuity (Letters) From Month 3 to Month 4 Through Month 12
Time Frame: Month 3 to month 4 through Month 12
Visual acuity (VA) was assessed at every study visit using best correction determined from protocol refraction. VA measurements (number of letters correctly identified) were performed with the patient in a sitting position using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like VA testing charts at a testing distance of 4 meters. This outcome measure describes the difference between the VA averaged across all visits from Month 4 through 12 and the Month 3 Level of Visual Acuity (Letters) of the Study Eye. The treatment regimen up to Month 3 is the same in both treatment groups.
Month 3 to month 4 through Month 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Average Visual Acuity Change (Letters) From Month 3 to Month 4 Through Month 24
Time Frame: Month 3 to month 4 through Month 24
Visual acuity (VA) was assessed at every study visit using best correction determined from protocol refraction. VA measurements (number of letters correctly identified) were performed with the patient in a sitting position using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like visual acuity testing charts at a testing distance of 4 meters. This outcome measure describes the difference between the average level of VA over all monthly post-baseline assessments from Month 4 to Month 24 and the Month 3 Level of VA. The treatment regimen up to Month 3 is the same in both treatment groups.
Month 3 to month 4 through Month 24
Average Visual Acuity Change From Baseline to Month 1 Through Month 12 and Month 1 Through Month 24
Time Frame: Baseline to Month 24
Visual acuity (VA) was assessed at every study visit using best correction determined from protocol refraction. VA measurements (number of letters correctly identified) were performed with the patient in a sitting position using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like visual acuity testing charts at a testing distance of 4 meters. This outcome measure describes the difference between VA averaged across all visits from Month 1 through Month 12 (24) and the baseline VA level
Baseline to Month 24
Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity (Letters) of the Study Eye Over Time
Time Frame: Baseline to 24 months
Visual acuity (VA) was assessed on both eyes during every study visit using best correction determined from protocol refraction. VA measurements (number of letters correctly identified) were performed with the patient in a sitting position using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like visual acuity testing charts at a testing distance of 4 meters. This outcome measure describes the change in visual acuity at each visit compared to baseline
Baseline to 24 months
Number of Patients With a BCVA Improvement of ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline to Month 24
Time Frame: Baseline to Month 24
Visual acuity (VA) was at every study visit using best correction determined from protocol refraction. VA measurements (number of letters correctly identified) were performed with the patient in a sitting position using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like visual acuity testing charts at a testing distance of 4 meters. This outcome measure describes for each post-baseline month whether or not a patient improved by equal or more than 5, 10, 15,or 30 letters of VA as compared to baseline.
Baseline to Month 24
Number of Patients With a BCVA Loss of 15 Letters in the Study Eye Over Time
Time Frame: Baseline to Month 24
Visual acuity (VA) was assessed at every study visit using best correction determined from protocol refraction. VA measurements (number of letters correctly identified) were performed with the patient in a sitting position using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like visual acuity testing charts at a testing distance of 4 meters. This outcome measure describes for each post-baseline month whether or not a patient lost less than 15 letters of VA as compared with baseline.
Baseline to Month 24
Number of Patients With a Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) of More of 73 Letters or More
Time Frame: Month 12 and 24
Visual acuity (VA) was assessed at every study visit using best correction determined from protocol refraction. VA measurements (number of letters correctly identified) were performed with the patient in a sitting position using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like visual acuity testing charts at a testing distance of 4 meters. This outcome measure describes for Month 12 and Month 24 whether a patient had a VA score of 73 or more letters
Month 12 and 24
Change From Baseline in Central Sub-Field Thickness (CSFT) of the Study Eye Over Time to Month 12 and Month 24
Time Frame: Baseline to Month 24
Optical coherence tomography(OCT) was used to assess CSFT (Central Sub-Field Thickness) representing the average retinal thickness of the circular area within 1 mm diameter around the foveal center. The Ns in the rows is the number of patients with a value for both baseline and the specific post-baseline visit
Baseline to Month 24
Duration of Ranibizumab Treatment Free Interval in the Study Eye up to Month 24
Time Frame: up to month 24
This outcome measure describes duration of treatment-free intervals. Treatment-free interval is defined as the number of visits (whether attended or not) where ranibizumab was not administered. n= the number of patients who had at least one ranibizumab treatment interruption
up to month 24
Duration of Ranibizumab Treatment Free Interval in the Study Eye Prior to Month 12
Time Frame: prior to month 12
This outcome measure describes duration of treatment-free intervals prior to month 12. Treatment-free interval is defined as the number of visits (whether attended or not) where ranibizumab was not administered. n= the number of patients who had at least one ranibizumab treatment interruption Treatment-free interval is analyzed in the Ranibizumab 0.5 mg PRN group only. It is not analyzed in the Ranibizumab 0.5 mg monthly group because, by protocol design, these participants receive treatment monthly. Therefore, the analysis does not apply to this group.
prior to month 12
Duration of Active Treatment Phase Prior to Month 12
Time Frame: Prior to month 12
Prior to month 12
Duration of Active Treatment Phase up to Month 24
Time Frame: up to month 24
up to month 24

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

February 22, 2013

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

November 23, 2015

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

November 23, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 22, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 22, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 24, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 4, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 21, 2019

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration

Clinical Trials on Ranibizumab

Subscribe