Comparison of 2-Dimensional and 3-Dimensional Laparoscopic Visions

December 31, 2013 updated by: Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital

Comparison of 2-Dimensional and New Generation 3-Dimensional Laparoscopic Visions In An Experimental Model

This study tests the hypothesis that use of the 3-D laparoscopic vision system (Viking Systems, La Jolla, CA) can significantly improve technical ability on a complex laparoscopic tasks in an experimental model.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

7 tasks on a 3-D laparoscopic instrument fitted to the trainer box and subjective criteria (4 point lickert scale) were evaluated for this study. Totally twenty-four participants (8 experienced, 8 minimal experienced and 8 novices) were evaluated for different 10 tasks (touch the marked circle, pass the two circle with needle, pick-beads and place, grape the suture, move the needle from one instrument to another instrument, pick-and-place, cutting, three different suturing) in term of total task time and error number. Statistical Package Program was used to perform statistical analyses. The data were presented as arithmetic means and standard deviations were calculated in each group. A P value of <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

24

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Istanbul, Turkey, 12345
        • Bagcilar Trainig and Research Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

25 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Medical doctors

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

medical doctors

Exclusion Criteria:

disabled person (about arms or vision problems)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Gynecologist
Gynecologist can use laparoscopic surgery.
Two methods will be compare

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
In order to test whether the 3-D laparoscopy vision system is superior or not than the 2-D laparoscopic vision system.
Time Frame: 15 days
We want to test the 3-D laparoscopic vision system (Viking Systems, La Jolla, CA) can significantly improve technical ability on a complex laparoscopic tasks in an experimental model. 7 tasks on a 3-D laparoscopic instrument fitted to the trainer box and subjective criteria (4 point lickert scale) were evaluated for this study. Totally twenty-four participants (8 experienced, 8 minimal experienced and 8 novices) were evaluated for different 10 tasks in term of total task time and error number.
15 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: TANER USTA, M.D., Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 13, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 25, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

February 27, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 3, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 31, 2013

Last Verified

December 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • BEHGynobs-4

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diagnostic Self Evaluation

Clinical Trials on Laparoscopic surgery

Subscribe