Ergonomic Benefits From Robotically Assisted Laparoscopy for Hysterectomies and Other Indications (ERCON)

October 25, 2023 updated by: University Hospital Tuebingen

Ergonomic Benefits From Robotically Assisted Laparoscopy for Hysterectomies and Other Selected Indications in Comparison to Conventional Laparoscopy - an Explorative Study

This is a prospective, single-center, observational clinical trial at the Department of Women's Health of the University Hospital Tübingen.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Monocentric trial to evaluate differences in musculoskeletal and cognitive demands of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) vs. conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS). Demographic and personal data are collected and pseudonymized. During surgery surface electromyography (EMG), electrocardiography (ECG), motion tracking data are collected and the surgery is documented by photos (1 photo/per second). Additionally, perceived physical discomfort (frequency and intensity) and mental load will be assessed within certain time intervals and at the very end of the surgery. The surgeon will not be disturbed in his actions and movement by the measurement equipment or applied procedures. Previous studies with similar designs can be seen as references in this context (549/2012BO1, 409/2013BO1, 262/2018BO1). After completing the surgery, the surgeon will rate difficulty of the surgery, work precision, eye strain and ergonomics during the surgery. Routine interventions like hysterectomies and other selected indications will be analyzed.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

4 (males and females) gynecological surgeons

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 18 and 68 years
  • surgeons that are able to work in full shift
  • trained surgeons in RALS and CLS
  • written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • persons influenced by analgesics or muscle relaxants
  • persons not able to perform their common work for any reason
  • persons with acute diseases
  • muscle injury

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Robotically Assisted Laparoscopy
Surgeons perform robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery
robotically assisted surgeries of about 60-minute duration with additional 30 min for preparing with the measurement equipment before surgery and 15 post evaluation of the corresponding surgery
Conventional Laparoscopy
Surgeons perform conventional laparoscopic surgery
conventional surgeries of about 60-minute duration with additional 30 min for preparing with the measurement equipment before surgery and 15 post evaluation of the corresponding surgery

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Muscle activity of the bilateral trapezius pars descendens muscle
Time Frame: during surgery
The muscle activity of the bilateral trapezius pars descendens muscle will be assessed using surface electromyography, with the root-mean-square (RMS) of electrical muscle activity recordings measured through bipolar surface electrodes. Data will be normalized to an isometric voluntary maximum electrical activation (MVE).
during surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Muscle activity of the bilateral forearm muscles
Time Frame: during surgery
The muscle activity of the bilateral forearm muscles will be assessed using surface electromyography, with the root-mean-square (RMS) of electrical muscle activity recordings measured through bipolar surface electrodes. Data will be normalized to an isometric voluntary maximum electrical activation (MVE).
during surgery
Kinematics
Time Frame: during surgery
For kinematics, the outcome measures involve the assessment of shoulder abduction, trunk, and head flexion angles in degrees, which are determined using gravimetric position sensors, providing precise measurements of body positioning during the task.
during surgery
Perceived physical discomfort
Time Frame: during surgery
Perceived physical discomfort is evaluated by assessing its frequency and intensity. Frequency indicates the number of occurrences, while intensity is measured on a 0 to 10 scale, where higher values indicate more intense discomfort. These measurements are recorded at 20-minute intervals to monitor changes in discomfort over time.
during surgery
Perceived mental demand
Time Frame: during surgery
Perceived mental demand is evaluated using the NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration ) Task Load Index (TLX) questionnaire's mental demand dimension, providing a subjective score ranging from 0 to 21, reflecting the perceived cognitive load during the task. Higher values are representing higher perceived mental demand.
during surgery
Perceived mental demand - Heart rate
Time Frame: during surgery
Heart rate (beats per minute) and heart rate variability, such as SDNN (standard deviation of the beat-to-beat differences in instantaneous heart rate), are recorded via electrocardiography to quantify physiological responses associated with mental demand.
during surgery
Perceived mental demand - Heart rate variability
Time Frame: during surgery
Heart rate variability, to be precise SDNN (standard deviation of the beat-to-beat differences in instantaneous heart rate), are recorded via electrocardiography to quantify physiological responses associated with mental demand.
during surgery
Work precision
Time Frame: during surgery
Work precision is measured during surgery using a visual analogue scale ranging from 0 to 100 mm, providing an indication of the precision and accuracy of the surgical maneuvers performed.
during surgery
Eye strain
Time Frame: during surgery
Eye strain is evaluated using a 10-item questionnaire designed to assess the severity of eye strain, with each question scored on a scale from 0 to 6, aiding in the comprehensive understanding of the subjective experience of visual discomfort.
during surgery

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Musculoskeletal complaints
Time Frame: within the last 12 months

The Nordic Questionnaire encompasses an evaluation of diverse parameters, including body height (measured in centimeters), body weight (measured in kilograms), physical activity (assessed in hours of sports per week), work experience (measured in years), and the presence of musculoskeletal complaints within the last 12 months, along with point prevalence [n]. This holistic assessment offers critical insights into the participants' physical condition and occupational health status.

Additionally, please note that the Nordic Questionnaire does not specifically employ a single scale; rather, it utilizes various metrics tailored to the different parameters, and thus, the measurement scales can differ based on the specific parameter being assessed.

within the last 12 months
Duration of the surgical procedure
Time Frame: 105 Minutes
The duration of the surgical procedure is a critical outcome measure, recorded in minutes, providing a precise indication of the time taken to complete the specific surgical intervention, aiding in the assessment of surgical efficiency and time management.
105 Minutes
Difficulty of the surgery
Time Frame: 5 Minutes
The perceived difficulty of the surgery is measured using a visual analogue scale ranging from 0 to 100 mm, with 0 indicating that the surgery was not difficult and 100 indicating that the surgery was very difficult. This measure allows the surgeons to subjectively express the complexity and challenges associated with the performed surgical procedure.
5 Minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Benjamin Steinhilber, PD Dr., Institute of Occupational and Social Medicine and Health Services Research
  • Principal Investigator: Bernhard Krämer, Prof. Dr., University Women's Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 10, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 25, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 31, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 31, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 25, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MT_ASENSUS SOS

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Musculoskeletal Diseases or Conditions

Clinical Trials on Robotically Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery

3
Subscribe