Improving Psychosocial Quality of Life in Women With Advanced Breast Cancer

July 11, 2017 updated by: Marla L Clayman, Northwestern University
Through a patient participation aid (PPA) the investigators hope to improve the psychosocial well-being of women diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer by empowering them to be active participants in clinical encounters.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The team has developed a brief Patient Participation Aid (PPA) to promote patient health literacy and encourage women to be active in the decisions that are being made about their healthcare which will lead to their satisfaction with healthcare and improves their psychosocial well-being. The paper-based PPA uses adult learning principles to limit and sequence plain language messages that have been framed from a patient's perspective. The PPA uses theory-based design to increase patients' involvement in the medical visit by modeling - through text and images - how a patient can: 1) set the visit agenda, 2) formulate questions, and 3) assert personal preferences. The specific aims of this study are to: 1- Assess the effectiveness of the PPA to increase patient involvement during clinical encounters. 2- Evaluate the effectiveness of the PPA to improve patient psychosocial outcomes. 3- Explore if the effect of the PPA varies by patients' literacy skills. To achieve this aims, the investigators will conduct a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the PPA among patients with a new diagnosis or progression of metastatic breast cancer at two cancer centers that serve diverse patient populations.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33612
        • H Lee Moffitt Comprehensive Cancer Center
    • Louisiana
      • Shreveport, Louisiana, United States, 71103
        • Feist-Weiller Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • female patients with metastatic breast cancer seeing one of the study physicians at one of the identified study clinics
  • age 21 or older
  • having suspected progression of metastatic disease

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with an uncorrectable hearing impairment or having limited English proficiency, as this would adversely affect their ability to communicate with the physician
  • patients with uncorrectable vision impairment, as this would make it impractical for the patient to read the intervention
  • patients too ill to meaningfully converse with the physician

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
Participants will begin with a pre-visit structured interview to determine emotional and physical well-being, anxiety, depression, and self-efficacy. Then they will be helped through the Patient-Participation Aid (PPA) by the research assistant (RA). Then they will meet with their doctor while the visit is video-recorded. After they will complete a post-visit interview to see if there were any health decisions made, patients level of involvement, and doctor communication. Follow up phone interviews will be conducted at 1 week and 3 months to assess patients self-reported changes in well-being, anxiety, depression, and decision regret.
The PPA consists of a folder that addresses the three behaviors we hope to influence: agenda setting, asking questions, and making preferences known. The information inside contains sample questions for each section, with room for the patient to write her own questions. Each section models behavior by giving context for the items and specific example questions. It also addresses barriers to understanding by indicating that it is acceptable to ask questions when something is not clear or terms are unfamiliar.
Other Names:
  • PPA
No Intervention: Usual Care
Participants will begin with a pre-visit structured interview to determine emotional and physical well-being, anxiety, depression, and self-efficacy. They will have their doctor's visit video recorded. After they will complete a post-visit interview to see if there were any health decisions made, patients level of involvement, and doctor communication.Follow up phone interviews will be conducted at 1 week and 3 months to assess patients self-reported changes in well-being, anxiety, depression, and decision regret.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G)
Time Frame: Change in functional assessment of cancer therapy from pre-visit at 3 months post-visit
Evaluated at 30 minutes prior to, one week after, and 3 months after the patients visit with their doctor, this measure collects scales of the social and family well-being, emotional well-being, and functional well-being.
Change in functional assessment of cancer therapy from pre-visit at 3 months post-visit

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM-SF)
Time Frame: Pre-Visit
A 7-item word recognition test to provide clinicians with a valid quick assessment of patient health literacy.
Pre-Visit

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Decision Regret Scale
Time Frame: Change in decision regret from pre-visit at 3 months post-visit
Collected at post-visit, and follow-ups, this measures the patient's regret and feelings regarding the most recent treatment-related decision
Change in decision regret from pre-visit at 3 months post-visit

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marla Clayman, Ph.D, Northwestern University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 19, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

May 19, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 19, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

March 14, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 14, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 11, 2017

Last Verified

July 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PPA Study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on Patient-Participation Aid

3
Subscribe