- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01833546
A Japanese Phase 1 Trial of TH-302 in Subjects With Solid Tumors and Pancreatic Cancer
March 8, 2018 updated by: Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
A Japanese Single Center, Open-label, Phase I Trial of TH-302 Given Intravenously to Subjects With Solid Tumors as Monotherapy or to Subjects With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer in Combination With Gemcitabine
This is a Japanese Phase 1, open-label, and dose-escalating trial of TH-302 as monotherapy in subjects with solid tumors and in combination with gemcitabine in subjects with pancreatic cancer.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
20
Phase
- Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Kashiwa, Japan
- Research Site
-
Tokyo, Japan
- Research Site
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- At least 20 years of age
- Signed written informed consent form
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced or metastatic solid tumor previously treated with one or more standard treatment regimen(s) or for which no effective therapy is available
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed locally advanced unresectable or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma previously untreated with chemotherapy or systemic therapy
- Recovered from toxicities of prior anti-cancer treatment to Grade 1 or less
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1
- Life expectancy of at least 3 months
- Acceptable liver function, renal function, hematologic status and coagulation status as defined in the protocol
- No clinically significant abnormalities in urinalysis
- Effective contraception for both male and female subjects if the risk of conception exists
- Other inclusion criteria apply
Exclusion Criteria:
- Prior anti-cancer treatment with more than 3 myelosuppressive cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens
- Prior treatment with gemcitabine for their advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer, except for radiosensitizing doses of gemcitabine
- Prior radiotherapy to more than 30 percent of the bone marrow within 6 months prior to the trial entry
- Cardiac disease with New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class 3 or 4, within 6 months prior to the trial entry
- Clinically significant (that is, active) cardiovascular disease
- Seizure disorders requiring anticonvulsant therapy
- Known brain, leptomeningeal or epidural metastases (unless previously treated and well controlled for at least 3 months at the trial entry)
- Previously treated malignancies other than the current disease for at least 5 years at the trial entry
- Severe chronic obstructive or other pulmonary disease major surgery, within 4 weeks prior to the trial entry, without complete recovery
- Active, uncontrolled bacterial, viral, or fungal infections, requiring systemic therapy
- Anti-cancer treatment prior to trial entry
- Participation in an investigational drug or device trial within 4 weeks prior to the trial entry
- Known infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Hepatitis B, or Hepatitis C
- A history of allergic reactions
- Taking a medication that is either moderate or strong inhibitor or inducer of cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4 or is a sensitive substrate of other cytochrome P450
- Pregnancy or lactation period
- Concomitant disease or condition that could interfere with the conduct of the trial, or that would, in the opinion of the Investigator, pose an unacceptable risk to the subject in this trial
- Unwillingness or inability to comply with the trial protocol for any reason
- Legal incapacity or limited legal capacity
- Other exclusion criteria apply
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Evofosfamide 240 mg
|
Evofosfamide infusion intravenously at an escalated dose of 240, 340 or 480 milligram per square meter (mg/m^2) on Day 1, 8 and 15 of each 28-day treatment cycle until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal.
|
|
Experimental: Evofosfamide 340 mg
|
Evofosfamide infusion intravenously at an escalated dose of 240, 340 or 480 milligram per square meter (mg/m^2) on Day 1, 8 and 15 of each 28-day treatment cycle until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal.
|
|
Experimental: Evofosfamide 480 mg
|
Evofosfamide infusion intravenously at an escalated dose of 240, 340 or 480 milligram per square meter (mg/m^2) on Day 1, 8 and 15 of each 28-day treatment cycle until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal.
|
|
Experimental: Evofosfamide 340 mg + Gemcitabine
|
Evofosfamide infusion intravenously at an escalated dose of 240, 340 or 480 milligram per square meter (mg/m^2) on Day 1, 8 and 15 of each 28-day treatment cycle until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal.
Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m^2 on Day 1, 8 and 15 of each 28-day treatment cycle until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Experienced Any Dose-Limiting Toxicity (DLT) During First Cycle - Day 1 to 28
Time Frame: Day 1 up to Day 28 of Cycle 1
|
A DLT was defined as any of the following toxicities at any dose level that occurred during the first cycle, and were considered to be related to the study drug by the Investigator or the Sponsor: - Grade 3 or Grade 4 non-hematological toxicity, except for Grade 3 or Grade 4 nausea, vomiting and diarrhea, - Grade 3 or higher skin reactions or mucosal toxicities, - Febrile neutropenia, - Grade 3 alanine aminotransferase (ALT)/aspartate aminotransferase (AST) elevation lasting more than 7 days, - Grade 4 neutropenia lasting more than 5 days, - Grade 4 thrombocytopenia, - Grade 4 anemia, - Any non-preexisting Grade 2 or higher non-hematologic toxicity which, in the judgment of the Investigator and the Sponsor, was considered a DLT, - Any Grade 2 or higher non-hematologic toxicity that did not resolve to Grade 0 or Grade 1 toxicity by the start of the next cycle which, in the judgment of the Investigator and the Sponsor, was considered a DLT.
|
Day 1 up to Day 28 of Cycle 1
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE), Serious TEAEs, TEAEs Leading to Death
Time Frame: Baseline up to 33 months
|
AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this the study drug.
An AE was defined as any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug.
A serious AE was an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important.
TEAEs are events with start date on or after the date of first dose of study treatment and up to and including 30 days after the last dose of study treatment, or events with start date prior to the date of first dose of study treatment, and worsened in severity or become serious during treatment.
TEAEs include both Serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs.
|
Baseline up to 33 months
|
|
Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Evofosfamide and Its Metabolite (Bromo-isophosphoramide Mustard [Br-IPM])
Time Frame: Monotherapy: pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.58, 0.75, 1, 1.08, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 6.5, 8.5, 12.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15; Combination therapy: pre-dose, 0.5, 0.66, 1, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 6.5, 8, 10.5, 26.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
|
Monotherapy: pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.58, 0.75, 1, 1.08, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 6.5, 8.5, 12.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15; Combination therapy: pre-dose, 0.5, 0.66, 1, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 6.5, 8, 10.5, 26.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
|
|
|
Time to Reach Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Gemcitabine and Its Metabolite (2',2'-Difluorodeoxyuridine [dFdU])
Time Frame: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
|
Tmax was the time to peak concentration in plasma, obtained directly from the concentration versus time curve.
This outcome was applicable for only combination arm in which evofosfamide was administered along with gemcitabine.
|
Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
|
|
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Evofosfamide and Its Metabolite (Bromo-isophosphoramide Mustard [Br-IPM])
Time Frame: Monotherapy: pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.58, 0.75, 1, 1.08, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 6.5, 8.5, 12.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15; Combination therapy: pre-dose, 0.5, 0.66, 1, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 6.5, 8, 10.5, 26.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
|
Maximum observed plasma concentration was assessed.
|
Monotherapy: pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.58, 0.75, 1, 1.08, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 6.5, 8.5, 12.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15; Combination therapy: pre-dose, 0.5, 0.66, 1, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 6.5, 8, 10.5, 26.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
|
|
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Gemcitabine and Its Metabolite (2',2'-Difluorodeoxyuridine [dFdU])
Time Frame: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
|
Maximum observed Plasma concentration was assessed.
This outcome was applicable for only combination arm in which evofosfamide was administered along with gemcitabine.
|
Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
|
|
Terminal Rate Constant Associated With the Terminal Elimination Phase (λz) of Evofosfamide and Its Metabolite (Bromo-isophosphoramide Mustard [Br-IPM])
Time Frame: Monotherapy: pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.58, 0.75, 1, 1.08, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 6.5, 8.5, 12.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15; Combination therapy: pre-dose, 0.5, 0.66, 1, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 6.5, 8, 10.5, 26.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
|
Terminal rate constant was determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve using linear regression on terminal data points of the curve.
|
Monotherapy: pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.58, 0.75, 1, 1.08, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 6.5, 8.5, 12.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15; Combination therapy: pre-dose, 0.5, 0.66, 1, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 6.5, 8, 10.5, 26.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
|
|
Terminal Rate Constant Associated With the Terminal Elimination Phase (λz) of Gemcitabine and Its Metabolite (2',2'-Difluorodeoxyuridine [dFdU])
Time Frame: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
|
Terminal rate constant was determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve using linear regression on terminal data points of the curve.
This outcome was applicable for only combination arm in which evofosfamide was administered along with gemcitabine.
|
Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
|
|
Apparent Terminal Half-life (t1/2) of Evofosfamide and Its Metabolite (Bromo-isophosphoramide Mustard [Br-IPM])
Time Frame: Monotherapy: pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.58, 0.75, 1, 1.08, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 6.5, 8.5, 12.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15; Combination therapy: pre-dose, 0.5, 0.66, 1, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 6.5, 8, 10.5, 26.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
|
Terminal half-life was calculated as ln(2)/λz.
Where λz is a Terminal rate constant, which was determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve using linear regression on terminal data points of the curve.
|
Monotherapy: pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.58, 0.75, 1, 1.08, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 6.5, 8.5, 12.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15; Combination therapy: pre-dose, 0.5, 0.66, 1, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 6.5, 8, 10.5, 26.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
|
|
Apparent Terminal Half-life (t1/2) of of Gemcitabine and Its Metabolite (2',2'-Difluorodeoxyuridine [dFdU])
Time Frame: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
|
Terminal half-life was calculated as ln(2)/λz.
Where λz is a Terminal rate constant, which was determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve using linear regression on terminal data points of the curve.
This outcome was applicable for only combination arm in which evofosfamide was administered along with gemcitabine.
|
Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
|
|
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) From Time Zero to Sampling Time With Concentration at or Above the Lower Limit of Quantitation (AUC[0-t]) of Evofosfamide and Its Metabolite (Bromo-isophosphoramide Mustard [Br-IPM])
Time Frame: Monotherapy: pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.58, 0.75, 1, 1.08, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 6.5, 8.5, 12.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15; Combination therapy: pre-dose, 0.5, 0.66, 1, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 6.5, 8, 10.5, 26.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
|
Area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration was assessed.
|
Monotherapy: pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.58, 0.75, 1, 1.08, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 6.5, 8.5, 12.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15; Combination therapy: pre-dose, 0.5, 0.66, 1, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 6.5, 8, 10.5, 26.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
|
|
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) From Time Zero to Sampling Time With Concentration at or Above the Lower Limit of Quantitation (AUC[0-t]) of Gemcitabine and Its Metabolite (2',2'-Difluorodeoxyuridine [dFdU])
Time Frame: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
|
Area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration was assessed.
This outcome was applicable for only combination arm in which evofosfamide was administered along with gemcitabine.
|
Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
|
|
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC [0-infinity]) of Evofosfamide and Its Metabolite (Bromo-isophosphoramide Mustard [Br-IPM])
Time Frame: Monotherapy: pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.58, 0.75, 1, 1.08, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 6.5, 8.5, 12.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15; Combination therapy: pre-dose, 0.5, 0.66, 1, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 6.5, 8, 10.5, 26.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
|
Area under the concentration-time curve from time zero extrapolated to infinity, calculated as AUC(0-last) + last observed concentration (Clast)/terminal rate constant (λz), using the linear trapezoidal rule for increasing concentrations and the logarithmic rule for decreasing concentrations.
Where AUC(0-last) is area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration was assessed.
λz was determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve using linear regression on terminal data points of the curve.
|
Monotherapy: pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.58, 0.75, 1, 1.08, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 6.5, 8.5, 12.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15; Combination therapy: pre-dose, 0.5, 0.66, 1, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 6.5, 8, 10.5, 26.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
|
|
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC [0-infinity]) of Gemcitabine and Its Metabolite (2',2'-Difluorodeoxyuridine [dFdU])
Time Frame: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
|
Area under the concentration-time curve from time zero extrapolated to infinity, calculated as AUC(0-last) + last observed concentration (Clast)/terminal rate constant (λz), using the linear trapezoidal rule for increasing concentrations and the logarithmic rule for decreasing concentrations.
Where AUC(0-last) is area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration was assessed.
λz was determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve using linear regression on terminal data points of the curve.
This outcome was applicable for only combination arm in which evofosfamide was administered along with gemcitabine.
|
Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
|
|
Apparent Total Body Clearance of (CL) of Evofosfamide
Time Frame: Monotherapy: pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.58, 0.75, 1, 1.08, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 6.5, 8.5, 12.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15; Combination therapy: pre-dose, 0.5, 0.66, 1, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 6.5, 8, 10.5, 26.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
|
Apparent total clearance (CL/F) was calculated as dose divided by area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time zero extrapolated to infinity (AUC[inf]).
|
Monotherapy: pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.58, 0.75, 1, 1.08, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 6.5, 8.5, 12.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15; Combination therapy: pre-dose, 0.5, 0.66, 1, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 6.5, 8, 10.5, 26.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
|
|
Apparent Total Body Clearance of (CL) of Gemcitabine
Time Frame: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
|
Apparent total clearance (CL/F) was calculated as dose divided by area under the plasma concentration-time profile from time zero extrapolated to infinity (AUC[inf]).
This outcome was applicable for only combination arm in which evofosfamide was administered along with gemcitabine.
|
Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
|
|
Apparent Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss) of Evofosfamide
Time Frame: Monotherapy: pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.58, 0.75, 1, 1.08, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 6.5, 8.5, 12.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15; Combination therapy: pre-dose, 0.5, 0.66, 1, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 6.5, 8, 10.5, 26.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
|
Volume of distribution was defined as the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired blood concentration of a drug.
Steady state volume of distribution (Vss) was the apparent volume of distribution at steady-state.
|
Monotherapy: pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.58, 0.75, 1, 1.08, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 6.5, 8.5, 12.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15; Combination therapy: pre-dose, 0.5, 0.66, 1, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 6.5, 8, 10.5, 26.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
|
|
Apparent Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss) of Gemcitabine
Time Frame: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
|
Volume of distribution was defined as the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired blood concentration of a drug.
Steady state volume of distribution (Vss) was the apparent volume of distribution at steady-state.
This outcome was applicable for only combination arm in which evofosfamide was administered along with gemcitabine.
|
Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
|
|
Apparent Volume of Distribution During Terminal Phase (Vz) of Evofosfamide
Time Frame: Monotherapy: pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.58, 0.75, 1, 1.08, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 6.5, 8.5, 12.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15; Combination therapy: pre-dose, 0.5, 0.66, 1, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 6.5, 8, 10.5, 26.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
|
Apparent volume of distribution during the terminal phase, calculated as Vz = Dose/AUC0-inf multiplied by elimination rate constant [λz]) following single dose.
Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity, calculated (AUC0-inf) as AUC0-t + AUCextra.
AUCextra represents an extrapolated value obtained by Clast / λz, where Clast is the calculated serum concentration at the last sampling time point at which the measured plasma concentration is at or above lower limit of quantification (LLQ) and λz is the elimination rate constant.
And the elimination rate constant obtained from linear regression of the terminal phase of the log transformed concentration-time data.
|
Monotherapy: pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.58, 0.75, 1, 1.08, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 6.5, 8.5, 12.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15; Combination therapy: pre-dose, 0.5, 0.66, 1, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 6.5, 8, 10.5, 26.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
|
|
Apparent Volume of Distribution During Terminal Phase (Vz) of Gemcitabine
Time Frame: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
|
Apparent volume of distribution during the terminal phase, calculated as Vz = Dose/AUC0-inf multiplied by elimination rate constant [λz]) following single dose.
Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity, calculated (AUC0-inf) as AUC0-t + AUCextra.
AUCextra represents an extrapolated value obtained by Clast / λz, where Clast is the calculated serum concentration at the last sampling time point at which the measured plasma concentration is at or above lower limit of quantification (LLQ) and λz is the elimination rate constant.
And the elimination rate constant obtained from linear regression of the terminal phase of the log transformed concentration-time data.
This outcome was applicable for only combination arm in which evofosfamide was administered along with gemcitabine.
|
Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
|
|
Cumulative Amount of Evofosfamide Excreted From Time Zero to Time After Dosing (Ae0-t)
Time Frame: Monotherapy: pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.58, 0.75, 1, 1.08, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 6.5, 8.5, 12.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15; Combination therapy: pre-dose, 0.5, 0.66, 1, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 6.5, 8, 10.5, 26.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
|
Cumulative amount excreted in urine from time zero to the end of the last measurable concentration was reported.
|
Monotherapy: pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.58, 0.75, 1, 1.08, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 6.5, 8.5, 12.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15; Combination therapy: pre-dose, 0.5, 0.66, 1, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 6.5, 8, 10.5, 26.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
|
|
Renal Clearance (CL) for Evofosfamide
Time Frame: Monotherapy: pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.58, 0.75, 1, 1.08, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 6.5, 8.5, 12.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15; Combination therapy: pre-dose, 0.5, 0.66, 1, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 6.5, 8, 10.5, 26.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
|
Renal clearance is the volume of plasma from which the drug is completely removed by the kidney in a given amount of time.
|
Monotherapy: pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 0.58, 0.75, 1, 1.08, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 6.5, 8.5, 12.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15; Combination therapy: pre-dose, 0.5, 0.66, 1, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 6.5, 8, 10.5, 26.5 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15
|
|
Best Overall Response (BOR)
Time Frame: Time from first treatment to final assessment at 33 months
|
BOR was determined according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1).
BOR was defined as the best response of any of the confirmed complete response (CR), confirmed partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD).
CR: Disappearance of all evidence of target and non-target lesions.
PR: At least 30% reduction from baseline in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions.
Stable disease (SD)=Neither sufficient increase to qualify for PD nor sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR.
PD was defined as at least a 20 percent (%) increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions.
Number of participants with CR, PR, SD and PD were reported.
|
Time from first treatment to final assessment at 33 months
|
|
Number of Participants With Objective Response
Time Frame: Time from first treatment to final assessment at 33 months
|
OR was determined according to RECIST v1.1.
Objective response is defined as a best overall response of confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR).
CR: Disappearance of all evidence of target and non-target lesions.
PR: At least 30% reduction from baseline in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions.
Number of participants with OR were reported.
|
Time from first treatment to final assessment at 33 months
|
|
Number of Participants With Disease Control
Time Frame: Time from first treatment to final assessment at 33 months
|
Disease Control was defined as having achieved at least disease stabilization; that is participants with confirmed CR, PR, or SD lasting for at least 16 weeks.
CR: Disappearance of all target lesions.
PR: A decrease of at least 30% in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions.
PD: PD is defined as at least a 20 percent (%) increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions.
SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for partial response nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease.
|
Time from first treatment to final assessment at 33 months
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Significant Laboratory Abnormalities and Vital Signs Abnormalities Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events
Time Frame: Baseline up to 33 months
|
Clinical laboratory parameters that were assessed included: hematological parameters, blood chemistry parameters, coagulation and urinalysis and the vital signs that were assessed included: blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, and body temperature.
|
Baseline up to 33 months
|
|
Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time Frame: Baseline up to 33 months
|
Twelve-lead ECGs were performed and assessed after at least 5 minutes rest in supine position locally.
|
Baseline up to 33 months
|
|
Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Score of 2 or Higher Than 2
Time Frame: Baseline up to 33 months
|
ECOG performance status measured to assess subject's performance status on a scale of 0 to 5, where 0=Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease activities without restriction; 1=Restricted in physically strenuous activity, ambulatory and able to carry out light or sedentary work; 2=Ambulatory (more than 50% of waking hours), capable of all self-care, unable to carry out any work activities; 3=Capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours; 4=Completely disabled, cannot carry on any self-care, totally confined to bed/chair; 5=Death.
Number of participants with ECOG performance status score of 2 or higher than 2 were reported.
|
Baseline up to 33 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
April 18, 2013
Primary Completion (Actual)
August 31, 2015
Study Completion (Actual)
January 25, 2016
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
April 12, 2013
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 12, 2013
First Posted (Estimate)
April 17, 2013
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
October 15, 2018
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 8, 2018
Last Verified
February 1, 2018
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Digestive System Diseases
- Neoplasms
- Neoplasms by Site
- Endocrine System Diseases
- Digestive System Neoplasms
- Endocrine Gland Neoplasms
- Pancreatic Diseases
- Pancreatic Neoplasms
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Anti-Infective Agents
- Antiviral Agents
- Enzyme Inhibitors
- Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic
- Antimetabolites
- Antineoplastic Agents
- Immunosuppressive Agents
- Immunologic Factors
- Gemcitabine
Other Study ID Numbers
- EMR200592-002
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pancreatic Cancer
-
City of Hope Medical CenterRecruitingPancreatic Neoplasms | Pancreatic Cancer | Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma | Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma | Pancreatic Cancer Resectable | Pancreatic Carcinoma | Pancreatic Cancer Non-resectable | Pancreatic Cancer Stage III | Pancreatic Cancer Stage | Pancreatic Cancer Stage II | Pancreatic Cancer, Adult | Pancreatic... and other conditionsUnited States, Japan, South Korea
-
Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson...CelgeneWithdrawnPancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma | Stage III Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IV Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIB Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IB Pancreatic CancerUnited States
-
The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical...Peking University Cancer Hospital & InstituteNot yet recruiting
-
Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and...Not yet recruiting
-
University of NebraskaNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedPancreatic Adenocarcinoma | Stage III Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIB Pancreatic Cancer | Stage II Pancreatic Cancer | Stage I Pancreatic Cancer | Resectable Pancreatic Carcinoma | Stage IA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IB Pancreatic CancerUnited States
-
University of UtahNovartis Pharmaceuticals; Huntsman Cancer InstituteTerminatedMetastatic Pancreatic Carcinoma | Unresectable Pancreatic Carcinoma | Stage III Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IV Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIB Pancreatic Cancer | Stage II Pancreatic CancerUnited States
-
Virginia Commonwealth UniversityNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedPancreatic Adenocarcinoma | Recurrent Pancreatic Carcinoma | Stage III Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIB Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IB Pancreatic CancerUnited States
-
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterActive, not recruitingPancreatic Cancer | Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic | Pancreatic Cancer Stage IV | Metastatic Pancreatic Carcinoma | Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma | Pancreatic Carcinoma | Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer | Pancreatic Cancer Non-resectable | Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma | Pancreatic Carcinoma... and other conditionsUnited States
-
Case Comprehensive Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)TerminatedPancreatic Adenocarcinoma | Resectable Pancreatic Cancer | Stage III Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIB Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IB Pancreatic Cancer | Poorly Differentiated Malignant Neoplasm | Undifferentiated Pancreatic CarcinomaUnited States
-
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer CenterRecruitingPancreatic Neoplasms | Pancreas Adenocarcinoma | Pancreatic Cancer Resectable | Cancer of Pancreas | Pancreatic Cancer Non-resectable | Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) | Pancreatic Cancer, AdultUnited States
Clinical Trials on Evofosfamide
-
ImmunoGenesisAgenus Inc.RecruitingMetastatic Prostate Cancer | Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer | Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell CarcinomaUnited States
-
University Health Network, TorontoImmunoGenesisNot yet recruitingCastration Resistant Prostate CancerCanada
-
Threshold PharmaceuticalsM.D. Anderson Cancer CenterUnknownMelanoma | Pancreatic Cancer | Prostate Cancer | Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and NeckUnited States