Effects of STN DBS on Cognition and Brain Networks in PD Patients Analyzed Based on EEG and fNIRS

December 8, 2023 updated by: Zhiqi Mao

Effects of STN Deep Brain Stimulation on Cognition and Brain Networks in Parkinson's Disease Patients Analyzed Based on EEG and Functional Near-infrared Spectroscopy

In recent years, deep brain stimulation (DBS) has become the primary treatment for patients with medically uncontrolled Parkinson's disease (PD). Nevertheless, previous studies have shown that it has been controversial whether DBS-subthal amic nucleus (STN) has facilitated or impaired cognitive function in patients with PD. The etiology of the effect of DBS on the single cognitive domain, executive function, has yet to be clarified. Previous clinical studies in which DBS was performed in patients with PD have been performed under the Stroop effect. TMT (Trail Making Test A and B) cognitive tests and simultaneous acquisition of brain function data by electroencephalograph-functional near-infrared spectroscopy (EEG-fNIRS) have yet to be reported.

To investigate the effect of DBS-STN on executive function in PD patients and whether there are differences at baseline, 1-month postoperative (DBS-on), 6 months postoperative follow-up, and 12 months postoperative follow-up. Under the condition of electroencephalograph-functional near-infrared spectroscopy (EEG-fNIRS) bimodal technology fusion, The investigators allow PD patients to operate the test of executive function (Stroop/TMT), real-time monitoring of cranial neurophysiology-oxygenation signals, and explore the changes of the brain function network of PD patients, and hope to achieve the following objectives through objective and scientific-technological means: (1) quantify the cognitive function of PD patients through EEG-fNIRS technology and possible trends of changes; (2) explain whether executive functions differ at the level of brain functional network connectivity between surgical and conservative treatments and whether the differences have interaction effects with treatment duration and treatment modalities, as well as analyze their simple effects; (3) To minimize artificial confounders of short-term learning effects and testers common to previous neurocognitive psychobehavioral tests; (4) To explore the mechanism of DBS on the changes of cortical brain networks in PD patients, to avoid or reduce the interference of surgery on cognitive functions, and to provide a theoretical basis for treating personalized surgical plans.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In recent years, deep brain electrical stimulation (DBS) has become a primary treatment for improving clinical symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients with predominantly motor slowing after poor drug effects from conventional drug therapy medications or after the progression of the disease. However, previous studies have been controversial in examining whether DBS-STN promotes or impairs cognitive function in patients with PD. Previous studies have found that DBS may affect executive function in patients with PD and that specific brain regions are closely related to executive function. In this study, the investigators used electroencephalograph-functional near-infrared spectroscopy (EEG-fNIRS) to obtain brain network connectivity in subjects and to explore the possible relationship between executive function and brain network connectivity in patients with Parkinson's disease. To explore the possible brain network connectivity affecting execution in DBS-STN and to predict postoperative executive function in PD patients in DBS.

Among the single cognitive domains impaired, executive function impairment is the most common, accounting for more than 70% of the cases, and impairment of attention, working memory, and visuospatial ability are also more common. Impaired executive function is the most characteristic cognitive impairment in PD patients, which is related to the disruption of the integrity of the frontal-striatal loops, designing a wide range of functional brain regions, such as the frontal lobe, parietal lobe, cingulate gyrus, thalamus, substantia nigra, and so on, and clinically manifested as impaired cognitive flexibility, planning, concept formation, working memory, and learning ability. Executive dysfunction can seriously affect patients' social behavior, especially when performing more complex tasks that require the integration of multiple steps in a particular order.

Previous studies have found that brain network connectivity in specific brain regions is closely related to cognitive function, for example, there have been many clinical studies based on functional MRI blood oxygenation signals, but because of the poor immunity to electromagnetic interference, patients with implanted electrodes have to be DBS-off in order to do the MRI. Because of poor anti-motor interference, only some motor imagery and simple finger movements can be acquired under the DBS-off condition for functional MRI, and functional MRI has been an important issue limiting cognitive neuroscience research due to its low temporal resolution and its inability to monitor in real-time the changes of cortical brain blood oxygenation signals in the task paradigm.

Therefore, this study plans to design a multicenter, prospective, randomized, parallel-controlled equipotent clinical trial, which innovatively combines electroencephalography (EEG) with high temporal resolution and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) with a high spatial resolution to monitor cortical oxygenation signals in real-time, so that the brain electrophysiological and blood oxygenation signals can be acquired in real-time during a test of executive function (Stroop/TMT). The real-time measurement and evaluation of cognitive function by synchronously acquiring electrophysiological and oxygenation signaling changes in the brain while the patient is performing the executive function test (Stroop/TMT) and obtaining real-time EEG-fNIRS brain network data during the executive function test has always been a higher-order field of cognitive function research. The present study investigated the mechanisms of executive function impairment in PD patients and whether DBS-STN affects the brain network mechanisms of executive function. It is hoped to (1) quantify cognitive function and possible trends in cognitive functioning in PD patients by EEG-fNIRS technique, (2) Explain whether there are differences in executive function at the level of brain functional network connectivity between surgical and conservative treatments and whether there are interaction effects of the differences with the duration of treatment and the treatment modality as well as to analyze their simple effects, (3) To minimize artificial confounders of short-term learning effects and testers familiar with previous neurocognitive psychobehavioral tests, (4) To explore the mechanism of DBS on the changes of cortical brain networks in PD patients, to avoid or reduce the interference of surgery on cognitive functions, and to provide a theoretical basis for treating personalized surgical plans.

In this study, the investigators planned to design a multicenter, prospective, randomized, parallel-controlled clinical trial. A total of 80 patients were randomly assigned to the DBS-STN group. The DBS treatment group, with the non-DBS treatment group, routinely DBS-on at 1 month postoperatively. The conservative treatment routinely on oral medication and the data on patients' brain function was collected by the simultaneous EEG-fNIRS bimodal technique in combination with cognitive testing (Stroop/TMT) at baseline, 1 month after DBS (DBS-on), and at 6 months/12 months after DBS, respectively.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Beijing, China
        • Recruiting
        • Chinese PLA General Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with primary PD whose diagnosis meets "China's Diagnostic Criteria for Parkinson's Disease" issued in 2016.
  2. Disease duration: In principle, PD patients with disease duration ≥5 years, patients with disease duration <5 years but meeting the clinical confirmation criteria for primary PD, with confirmation of surgical indications, the duration of the disease can be relaxed to 4 years, PD patients with predominantly tremor, with unsatisfactory improvement of tremor by standardized drug therapy and severe tremor affecting the patient's quality of life, the duration of the disease can be relaxed to 3 years after evaluation.
  3. Patients who have received levodopa medication with good efficacy and ≥30% improvement of symptoms in dopamine shock test.
  4. Significant decrease in the efficacy of drug therapy, intolerable motor complications, and drug side effects.
  5. Disease severity: In patients with symptomatic fluctuation of the "on-off" phenomenon, the Hoehn-Yahr stage of the off phase is 2.5-4.0.
  6. Age: The age of patients undergoing surgery is usually <75 years old, and if the patient's physical condition is good, the age limit can be appropriately relaxed.
  7. Those who agree to undergo evaluation and can cooperate to complete the follow-up.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Have significant cognitive dysfunction.
  2. Have a psychiatric disorder such as severe depression, anxiety, or schizophrenia.
  3. Have underlying severe diseases that cannot tolerate surgery or affect post-operative survival.
  4. The disease has progressed to the terminal stage, and the patient is entirely unable to take care of himself/herself and is bedridden.
  5. Those with abnormal intracranial lesions and contraindications to MRI scanning, such as those with metal implants, claustrophobia, etc.
  6. Parkinson's disease syndrome and Parkinson's superimposed syndrome caused by other reasons.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: surgical group
Undergoing DBS

An elaborate target/trajectory planning and a precise image fusion of MRI and stereotactic CT scanning are performed before surgery. After microelectrode recording, two sets of quadripolar DBS leads (contact interval is 0.5mm) will be inserted into the dorsolateral part of bilateral STN nuclei separately. Subsequently, an implantable pulse generator will be connected via extension wires and implanted at the left/right subclavicular area subcutaneously.

Device: STN-DBS devices DBS electrode: 3389 (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) or L301 (PINS Medical, Beijing, China) or 1200 (SceneRay, Suzhou, China); Extension wire: 37086 (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) or E202 (PINS Medical, Beijing, China) or 1340/SR1341 (SceneRay, Suzhou, China); Implantable pulse generator: ACTIVA PC/RC (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) or G102/G102R (PINS Medical, Beijing, China) or 1180/SR1101 (SceneRay, Suzhou, China).

Sham Comparator: control group
Undergoing non-DBS
Patients with PD were given their original drug dose and did not receive DBS.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in EEG-fNIRS performance
Time Frame: up to 1 month (DBS-on) ,6 months,12 months
To explore the differences in cognitive brain network changes in PD patients by using EEG-fNIRS photofusion technology. The EEG-fNIRS bimodal brain network of PD patients were constructed, and the network characteristic indexes, such as node degree, characteristic path length, and clustering coefficient, were counted. The cognitive differences of PD patients were interpreted by the actual physiological state represented by the brain network feature indicators, for example, a high node entry degree means high information inflow in the brain area where the node is located, short feature path length means high efficiency of whole-brain information transfer in the patient, and large clustering coefficient means high degree of modularity in the brain area of the PD patient. These characteristic indexes can better reflect PD patients' cognitive state and change differences.
up to 1 month (DBS-on) ,6 months,12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Stroop scores
Time Frame: up to 1 month (DBS-on), 6 months, 12 months

Stroop A, B, and C elapsed time per card, number of correct (timing accurate to 0.01 s).

The metrics reflecting the amount of interference (Stroop interference effect, SIE) include:

SIE elapsed time = card C elapsed time - card B elapsed time; SIE correct number = card B correct number - card C correct number. The larger the SIE is, the lower the interference suppression effect is, and the more serious the impairment of executive function is.

The indexes observed in this study include the number of correct and elapsed times of cards A, B, and C, the number of elapsed time and correct number of SIE, the elapsed time of cards (C-A-B), the rate of increase of elapsed time (C-B)/A, the rate of decrease of correct number (B-C)/A, and the elapsed time/correct number of each card.

up to 1 month (DBS-on), 6 months, 12 months
Change in Trail Making Test A and B scores
Time Frame: up to 1 month (DBS-on), 6 months, 12 months
TMT-A, and TMT-B recording indicators include: TMT-A elapsed time number (timing accurate to 0.01s); TMT-B elapsed time number (timing accurate to 0.01s); Number of TMT-A and TMT-B error connection reminders, number of pen lifts; Interference Error Coefficient (IE): (TMT-A - TMT-B) / TMT-A
up to 1 month (DBS-on), 6 months, 12 months
Change in Mini-mental State Examination scores
Time Frame: up to 1 month (DBS-on), 6 months, 12 months
Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) will be used to evaluate the general cognitive function. MMSE ranges from 0 to 30, and a higher value represents a better outcome.
up to 1 month (DBS-on), 6 months, 12 months
Change in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) scores
Time Frame: up to 1 month (DBS-on), 6 months, 12 months
The Neuropsychiatric Inventory will be used to measure neuropsychiatric symptoms. It ranges from 0 to 144, and higher value represents a worse outcome.
up to 1 month (DBS-on), 6 months, 12 months
Change in Activities of Daily Living scores
Time Frame: up to 1 month (DBS-on), 6 months, 12 months
Activities of Daily Living (ADL) scale will be used to assess the change of life quality. It ranges from 20 to 80. The "20" represents normal life ability and the higher score presents the worse life ability.
up to 1 month (DBS-on), 6 months, 12 months
Change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores
Time Frame: up to 1 month (DBS-on), 6 months, 12 months
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) will be used to evaluate the general cognitive function. MoCA ranges from 0 to 30, and higher value represents a better outcome.
up to 1 month (DBS-on), 6 months, 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Zhiqi Mao, PhD, Chinese PLA General Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 28, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 8, 2023

First Posted (Estimated)

December 19, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 19, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 8, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson's Disease

Clinical Trials on Deep Brain Stimulation

Subscribe