Utility of Syringe Based Suction Versus Channel Suction in Bronchoalveolar Lavage

January 6, 2014 updated by: University of Oklahoma

Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is a common technique among pulmonologists. Its goal is to collect cells from alveolar units. This is done by wedging a flexible bronchoscope in a bronchus, instilling saline, and removing the saline via suction. Two techniques are currently used for suctioning: syringe based and channel suction.

The investigators concern is that channel suction creates too much force and there is collapsing of the airways which results in decreased fluid removal as well as cell sampling. The investigators propose that syringe based suctioning will not only return more of the instilled fluid but also more cells from the alveoli.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The pulmonary segment with the most disease on imaging will be the segment sampled. The scope will be wedged in the airway leading to that segment and 100mL of saline will be instilled into the selected segment and collected via the syringe based or channel based suction. Prior to unwedging, another 100mL of saline will be instilled into the same segment and will be collected using the alternative method. There will not be randomization, but the investigators will alternate which method is used first to eliminate confounding variables. All patients will receive both modalities of suctioning. The wall suction used for the channel suction will be set at 80 mm Hg. Syringe based suctioning will be performed with 20mL syringe. Total amount of fluid collected will be recorded and samples will be sent for cell count and differential as well as Gram stain and culture. Results of the two techniques will then be compared to determine which is the superior suctioning modality for BAL.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Oklahoma
      • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73104
        • OUHSC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Bronchoscopy scheduled

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Channel Suction first
This arm is for patients who will receive channel suction first to obtain the specimen then syringe suction to obtain the specimen.
The wall suction used for the channel suction will be set at 80 mm Hg. This arm is for patients who will receive channel suction first to obtain the specimen then syringe suction to obtain the specimen.
Syringe based suctioning will be performed with 20mL syringe.
Other: Syringe Suction first
This arm is for patients who will receive syringe suction first to obtain the specimen then channel suction to obtain the specimen.
The wall suction used for the channel suction will be set at 80 mm Hg. This arm is for patients who will receive channel suction first to obtain the specimen then syringe suction to obtain the specimen.
Syringe based suctioning will be performed with 20mL syringe.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Efficacy of Syringe Suction versus Channel Suction to retrieve volume
Time Frame: 24 hours
24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Efficacy of Syringe suction versus Channel suction to retrieve alveolar cells
Time Frame: 24 hours
24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Brent Brown, MD, OUHSC

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 5, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 14, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

May 15, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 7, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 6, 2014

Last Verified

January 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2296

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bronchoscopy

Clinical Trials on Bronchoscopy/ BAL with Channel Suction

3
Subscribe