Evaluation of Rectal Tumor Margin Using Confocal Endomicroscopy and Comparison to Histopathology (TRaMA)

May 9, 2018 updated by: IHU Strasbourg

This innovative study will involve the use of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy, a new medical imaging technology never used for surgical indications to date. Virtual biopsies (pCLE images) will be compared to histopathology analysis.

This study focuses on the evaluation of rectal tumor margins. The hypothesis is that pCLE will allow identification of rectal tumor margin, comparable to that of histopathology. In the future, decision of resection margin could rely on intraoperative pCLE exam.

The proposed study is a feasibility study, first in the indication of rectal cancer.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Defining the limits of resection of rectal tumors is often imprecise. The identification of the banks of a tumor becomes critical when it comes to the decision to potentially sacrifice the sphincter during the surgical resection. Currently tumor margins are identified by direct examination by the surgeon, or using flexible endoscopy. Endoscopy and confocal microscopy could provide precise images of tumor enabling the reliable definition of resection margins.

There would be a direct benefit for the patient, whom sphincter could be preserved. pCLE (probe-based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy) has already been widely used for colorectal lesions, and its value proposition has been demonstrated and validated in several studies. This study is the first using pCLE intraoperatively. Study results may lead the use of pCLE to validate surgical procedure decision (resection margin) and to a revision of patient management for colorectal cancer, by adapting neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy to the patient's responder status.

The goal is to identify tumor margin (lower pole) to optimize the resection margin, and to limit resection of healthy rectal tissue for optimal anal sphincter preservation. Moreover, determining the optimal date of surgery following neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy in rectal cancer is being discussed and no consensus has been reached. Therefore, to date, there is no formal evaluation of tumor response. This is partly due to the lack of information on tumor state and tumor evolution over time, between the end of radiochemotherapy and surgery. Histological follow up of tumor would provide supporting information to fill this gap. However, frequent tumor biopsies are not possible. Alternatively, probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) could allow for a sequential analysis of tumor response. Response to treatment could be assessed and used to define optimal date of surgical resection, depending on patient responding status to treatment. Responding patients would undergo surgery at a later date than non-responders, in whom surgery could be performed earlier.

Benefits of the study lay in the more accurate definition of resection margins, with its associated potential therapeutic impact of the anal sphincter preservation and in the definition of the optimal date of rectal tumor resection, based on response status to radiochemotherapy.

Study interests are :

  • Microscopic structure of tumor will be analyzed at the cellular and microvascular levels and compared to healthy mucosa.
  • Evolution of response during and following radiochemotherapy will be assessed, and will help classify patients as responders/non responders.
  • pCLE results will be compared to histopathology results on pre-treatment and resection biopsies.
  • Images gathered through the imaging modalities (WLE, pCLE, EUS) along with histopathology results will be combined to create an atlas and database of rectal tumors.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

21

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Strasbourg, France, 67000
        • Service de Chirurgie Digestive et Endocrinienne - Nouvel Hôpital Civil

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient, male or female over 18 years old
  • Patient with rectal adenocarcinoma :

    • stage T1 or T2, N0 (one single evaluation, during resection)
    • stage N+ or T3 (pre- and post-radiochemotherapy evaluations)
  • Absence of contra-indication to rectoscopy conduct
  • Patient able to understand the study and to provide written informed consent
  • Patient registered with the French social security regime

Non-inclusion criteria:

  • Absence of written informed consent
  • Patient with known or suspected allergy to fluorescein
  • Patient with history of reaction jeopardizing the vital prognosis during angiography
  • Patient with history of multiple or serious allergic reaction to drugs
  • Patient presenting, in the investigator's judgment, a condition or disease preventing their participation to study procedures
  • Patient pregnant or breast-feeding
  • Patient within exclusion period from other clinical trial
  • Patient having forfeited their freedom of an administrative or legal obligation
  • Patient being under guardianship

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Concordance in identification of lower pole of tumor
Time Frame: Up to 9 months

Identification of lower pole of tumor will be compared between pCLE (optical images, virtual biopsies) and conventional histopathology (biopsies, postoperative analysis of resected piece). Samples of tumor tissue and closest tissue thought to be disease-free.

Conventional biopsies and virtual biopsies prior to radiochemotherapy start (if applicable) and during surgery.

Up to 9 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Identification of tissue characteristics
Time Frame: Up to 9 months

Microvascularisation density, general microstructure, image interpretation criteria, true/false positive/negative.

Will be assessed for all patients at the time of surgical procedure. Also prior to treatment for patients undergoing radiochemotherapy.

Up to 9 months
Concordance of techniques (pCLE and histopathology)
Time Frame: Up to 9 months

Evaluation of concordance between pCLE and conventional histopathology for :

  • tissue characterization prior to and after radiochemotherapy, if applicable
  • radiochemotherapy response assessment
  • resection margin evaluation

For patients undergoing radiochemotherapy, 2 exams: prior to treatment start and during surgery For patients with surgery only, 1 exam: during surgery

Up to 9 months
Comparison of pCLE results to EUS (echoendoscopy) results
Time Frame: Upon surgery
pCLE results will be compared to EUS prior to radiochemotherapy and at the time of resection.
Upon surgery
Creation of an image bank
Time Frame: Up to 9 months
Creation of an image bank : identification of quality and safety criteria to be of interest for use at the time of resection
Up to 9 months
Assessment of predictive value of interpretation criteria
Time Frame: Up to 9 months
Results will be analyzed to assess whether pCLE interpretation criteria have a predictive value for identification of responder/non-responders patients to radiochemotherapy.
Up to 9 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Joël Leroy, Pr, Service de Chirurgie Disgestive et Endocrinienne - Nouvel Hôpital Civil - Strasbourg

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 7, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 17, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

October 17, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 20, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 24, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

June 27, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 15, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 9, 2018

Last Verified

May 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rectal Cancer

Clinical Trials on Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy

3
Subscribe