Study on Early Stage Bulky Cervical Cancers

August 11, 2015 updated by: Rajkumar Kottayasamy Seenivasagam

Randomised Phase III Clinical Trial on Concurent Chemoradiation vs. Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation and Surgery vs. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Surgery in Early Stage Bulky Cervical Cancers (FIGO Stages IB2, IIA2 and IIB)

The aim of this study is to establish the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemo irradiation in carcinoma cervix and to compare its results with the concurrent chemo irradiation in terms of overall survival, disease free survival and quality of life.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Early stage bulky cancers of the cervix, (defined as FIGO Stages IB2, IIA2 and IIB) form a distinctive subset of "curable" cervical cancers with good 5 year survival rates with adequate treatment. Concurrent chemo radiation with or without salvage surgery is at present the standard of care for this group of cervical cancers. However, when pelvic recurrences occur, the morbidity of salvage surgery after radiotherapy, especially brachytherapy is often higher than the morbidity of salvage radiotherapy following radical surgery. The advantages of downsizing the disease without the use of brachytherapy are tempting and open a completely new philosophy in radical treatment for "curable" early stage bulky cancers of the cervix. This approach is appealing especially in developing countries where the load of cervical cancers is high and radiotherapy (brachytherapy) resources are scarce.

The results of two Phase II trials conducted at Govt. Royapettah Hospital, Chennai (Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy followed by Radical Hysterectomy: Cisplatin + 5FU vs. Cisplatin +Paclitaxel) and at Govt. General Hospital,Chennai (Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation with weekly cisplatin and 50 EBRT followed by radical Hysterectomy) and one retrospective study ( Preoperative 50 GY EBRT followed by Radical Hysterectomy) have shown similar response rates and acceptable toxicity profiles when compared to concurrent chemoradiation (EBRT + Brachytherapy+ Chemotherapy). Similar studies have been published elsewhere with similar results.

With this in mind we are planning to conduct a Phase III Randomised control trial comparing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy + Radical Hysterectomy and Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation + Radical Hysterectomy with concurrent chemoradiation in this subset of cervical cancers

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

180

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Tamil Nadu
      • Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, 600014IndiaNaduI6
        • Recruiting
        • Government Royapettah Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Rajaraman Ramamurthy, MS MCh
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Subbiah Shanmugam, MS MCh

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with histologically confirmed bulky cervical Squamous cell carcinoma (FIGO stage IB2, II A2, IIB).
  2. Age 18-60 years
  3. Karnofsky performance status of ≥70%; ECOG PS ≤ 2

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Nonsquamous Histologies
  2. Other systemic diseases, comorbidities precluding full participation in the study
  3. Concomitant treatment with any experimental drug
  4. Pregnant or nursing women
  5. Previous or concomitant malignant diseases other than non-melanoma skin cancer
  6. Previous radiation to the pelvis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Concurrent Radical Chemoradiation
Paclitaxel(175 mg/sq.m) + Cisplatin (75 mg/sq.m) chemotherapy - 2 cycles of 3 weekly cycle Concurrent Radiotherapy - 50 Gy EBRT + Brachytherapy (7Gy HDR x 3 doses) All to be completed within 8-10 weeks
cisplatin 75 mg/m2 Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2
50 Gy/2 Gy/25 # external beam RT to cervix. four field technique. given concurrently with chemotherapy weeks 1 - 5
Ir - 192 HDR Brachytherapy - intracavitary. 7Gy x 3#. given after completion of chemoRT.
EXPERIMENTAL: Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation + Radical Hysterectomy
Paclitaxel(175 mg/m2) + Cisplatin(75 mg/m2) chemotherapy - 2 cycles of 3 weekly cycle Concurrent Radiotherapy - 50 Gy EBRT - completed within 5 weeks Radical Hysterectomy - 3 weeks after completion of RT All to be completed within 8-10 weeks
cisplatin 75 mg/m2 Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2
50 Gy/2 Gy/25 # external beam RT to cervix. four field technique. given concurrently with chemotherapy weeks 1 - 5
Type III Radical Hysterectomy + Bilateral Pelvic Node Dissection
EXPERIMENTAL: Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy + Radical Hysterectomy
Paclitaxel(175 mg/m2) + Cisplatin (75 mg/m2) chemotherapy - 3 cycles of 3 weekly cycle Radical Hysterectomy - 3 weeks after completion of chemotherapy All to be completed within 8-10 weeks
cisplatin 75 mg/m2 Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2
Type III Radical Hysterectomy + Bilateral Pelvic Node Dissection

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Overall and Disease free Survival
Time Frame: 3 year
3 year
Overall and Disease free Survival
Time Frame: 5 year
5 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Acute Adverse reactions and complications
Time Frame: Less than 10 weeks
Less than 10 weeks
SubAcute Adverse reactions and complications
Time Frame: 10 weeks - 6 months
10 weeks - 6 months
Chronic Adverse reactions and complications
Time Frame: 6 months to 5 years
6 months to 5 years

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Quality of Life
Time Frame: 3,5 years
3,5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Rajaraman Ramamurthy, MS MCh, centre for oncology, Government Royapettah Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2013

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

August 1, 2018

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

August 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 3, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 5, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

August 7, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

August 13, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 11, 2015

Last Verified

August 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Carcinoma Cervix

Clinical Trials on Chemotherapy

Subscribe