A Randomized, Clinical Trial of Oral Midazolam Versus Oral Ketamine for Sedation During Laceration Repair.

January 20, 2014 updated by: Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center

Sedation is often needed for young children undergoing minor procedures in the emergency department (ED). Oral midazolam is one of the most commonly used regimens for children undergoing laceration repair but its sedative efficacy was shown to be suboptimal. In only one randomized controlled study oral ketamine has been used successfully for procedural sedation for laceration repair. A recent study showed that the combination of oral midazolam and oral ketamine provided deeper sedation compared with oral midazolam alone. However children treated wuth the combination of midazolam and ketamine required longer recovery

Hypothesis:

Oral ketamine can provide superior sedation to oral midazolam in children requiring sedation for laceration repair.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Be'er Ya'aqov, Israel
        • Recruiting
        • Assaf Harofeh Mc
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Orit Rubinstein, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 year to 10 years (CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Any child with laceration requiring sedation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Major trauma
  • Closed head injury associated with loss of consciousness
  • Abnormal neurologic examination in a previously normal child
  • Significant developmental delay or baseline neurological deficit
  • A patient with seizures
  • Elevated intra-cranial pressure
  • Hypersensitivity to midazolam or ketamine
  • Hypertension
  • Hyperthyroidism or a patient receiving thyroid replacement
  • alcohol intoxication or a history of alcohol abuse
  • Acute or chronic respiratory, cardiac, renal or hepatic abnormalities
  • Glaucoma
  • Known psychiatric disease
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of more than 2
  • Informed consent cannot be obtained from legal guardian

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Ketamine
Oral ketamine
Oral Ketamine 5mg/kg Single dose
Other Names:
  • Ketalar
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Midazolam
Oral Midazolam
Oral midazolam - 0.7mg/kg single dose
Other Names:
  • Dormicum

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain score: Visual analog score (VAS)- by a parent
Time Frame: During the procedure - up to 1 hour
A parent will assess the child's pain on a Visual analog scale
During the procedure - up to 1 hour
Number of patients requiring IV sedation
Time Frame: During the procedure - up to 1 hour
patients who fail to achieve University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS) of two or higher will be switched to IV sedation
During the procedure - up to 1 hour

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
UMSS - by ED physician
Time Frame: During the procedure - up to 1 hour
During the procedure - up to 1 hour
• VAS by nurse
Time Frame: During the procedure - up to 1 hour
During the procedure - up to 1 hour
Time to reach UMSS > 2
Time Frame: up to 1 hour
up to 1 hour
• Procedure time
Time Frame: During the procedure - up to 1 hour
During the procedure - up to 1 hour
• Time from procedure to full recovery
Time Frame: While in the ED - estimated time around 2 hours
While in the ED - estimated time around 2 hours
The occurrence of adverse effects during the ED stay
Time Frame: While in the ED - estimated time around 2 hours

Significant adverse effects are defined as

  1. Oxygen desaturation <92% or hypoventilation requiering ventilatory support
  2. Need for hemodynamic support
  3. Anaphylaxis
  4. Seizures
  5. Any adverse effects requiring patient admission
While in the ED - estimated time around 2 hours
• Patients and parents satisfaction assessed on VAS
Time Frame: While in the ED - estimated time around 2 hours
While in the ED - estimated time around 2 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2013

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

February 1, 2014

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

July 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 17, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 18, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

August 20, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

January 22, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 20, 2014

Last Verified

August 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lacerations

Clinical Trials on Experimental Arm: Ketamine

3
Subscribe