Dose-relationship of Vaginally Administrated Oxytocin in Postmenopausal Women (OXYPEP002)

November 10, 2020 updated by: PepTonic Medical AB

A Double-blind, Placebo Controlled Single Centre Trial to Evaluate the Dose-relationship of the Effects of Vaginally Administered Oxytocin on the Vaginal Mucosal Membrane in Postmenopausal Women With Vaginal Atrophy

Up to 50% of all postmenopausal women, experience vaginal drynes, i.e. vaginal atrophy is a consequence due to the lack of estrogen. In addition, vaginal atrophy is associated with an increased pH, which creates an environment more susceptible to infections . The mucosal epithelium shows signs of severe senile atrophy and cytological examination demonstrate increased number of the basal and parabasal cells and reduced number of superficial cells . Unlike some other menopausal symptoms (for instance hot flushes), vaginal symptoms generally persist or worsen with aging.Oxytocin is a peptide hormone and it is released systemically via the posterior pituitary. The most well known effects of oxytocin are its roles in female reproduction such as facilitation of birth and breast feeding. Oxytocin has also shown to exert positive effects on the proliferation of human vaginal mucosal cells from postmenopausal women, an effect which could be attributed either to the direct stimulation of new cell formation or to an increased production of other growth factors. The primary objective is to investigate the dose relationsship of topical administrated Vagitocin on the vaginal mucosal membrane, measured in the change (%)of superficial cells up to 7 weeks after baseline.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

64

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Huddinge
      • Stockholm, Huddinge, Sweden, 14186
        • Karolinska University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Naturally postmenopausal or ooforectomized women, completely without menstrual bleedings for at least four years prior to baseline.
  2. > 40 years of age.
  3. Moderate to severe symptoms of at least one of the following criteria of vulvar and vaginal atrophy associated with the menopause, according to the patient's self-assessement: vaginal dryness, vaginal and/or vulvar irritation/itching, dysuria, vaginal pain associated with sexual activity, or presence of vaginal bleeding associated with sexual activity.
  4. Atrophic mucosa according to the investigator's assessment.
  5. Signed Informed Consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Usage of any sex steroids including phytoestrogens, hormonal intra-uterine device or herbal medicinal products with known estrogenic effects within 3 months prior to baseline.

    2. Usage of any lubricant for intra-vaginal administration at baseline. 3. Vaginal bleeding of unknown origin. 4. Vaginal pH ≤ 5.0. 5. Any ongoing uro-genital infection within 7 days prior to baseline. 6. Body Mass Index (BMI) >30 kg/m2. 7. Systolic Blood Pressure > 150 mmHg and Diastolic Blood Pressure > 90 mmHg at baseline.

    8. Any concurrent known or suspected tumor disease as judged by the investigator.

    9. Clinically significant medical history (excluding medically well-controlled hypertension and hypercholesterolemia), abnormal findings from physical examinations, vital signs, cytology, histology, US examination of uterus and ovaries or laboratory analyses that may interfere with the trial objectives or compromise the safety of the patient as judged by the Investigator.

    10. Concurrent and diagnosed nephrological or hepatic disorder 11. Diagnosed with HIV, Hepatitis B or C 12. Known or suspected drug or alcohol abuse, within 12 months prior to baseline.

    13. Known or suspected allergy to any ingredient of the trial product. 14. Incapacity to perform trial procedures, as judged by the investigator. 15. Participation in any other interventional clinical trial within 3 months prior to baseline.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Oxytocin 100 i.u.
N=24 patients are administrated Oxytocin 100 i.u. vaginally
Other Names:
  • Vagoticin
Experimental: Oxytocin 400 i.u.
N=24 patients are administrated Oxytocin 400 i.u. vaginally
Other Names:
  • Vagoticin
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
N=16 patients are administrated placebo vaginally

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To investigate the dose-relationship of topical Vagitocin on the vaginal mucosal membrane.
Time Frame: from baseline visit to 7 weeks of treatment
Change in percentage points of superficial cells from baseline visit (visit 1) to 7 weeks of treatment (Visit 3).
from baseline visit to 7 weeks of treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To investigate the safety and tolerability of topical Vagitocin treatment.
Time Frame: From visit 2 to visit 7

Change in percentage points of superficial cells from baseline visit to 2 (Visit 2) weeks of treatment.

Change in maturation value from baseline visit to 2 (Visit 2) and 7 (Visit 3) weeks of treatment.

Change in vaginal pH from baseline visit to 2 (Visit 2) and 7 (Visit 3) weeks of treatment.

Visual appearance of the vaginal mucosa after 2 (Visit 2) and 7 (Visit 3) weeks of treatment

  • Patients´ self-assessment of the most bothersome symptomafter 2 (Visit 2), 7 (Visit 3), weeks of treatment and at the telephone follow-up after 9 weeks.
  • Histological assessment after 2 (Visit 2) and 7 weeks (Visit 3) of treatment.
  • Change in score in selected items of WHQ/SSP from baseline visit to 7 (Visit 3) weeks of treatment and at the telephone follow-up after 9 weeks.
From visit 2 to visit 7

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Aino F Jonasson, M.D, PhD, Karolinska Institutet

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 13, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 13, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

November 19, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 13, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 10, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Vaginal Atrophy

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Subscribe