Clinical Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Macitentan in Subjects With Inoperable Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension (MERIT-1)

May 25, 2020 updated by: Actelion

Prospective, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Multicenter, Parallel-group, 24-week Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Macitentan in Subjects With Inoperable Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Study to evaluate if macitentan is efficient, safe and tolerable enough to be used for treatment of inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Leuven, Belgium, 3000
        • University Hospital Gasthuisberg / Interne Geneeskunde - I.G. Pneumologie
      • Beijing, China, 100020
        • Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital-Department of Respiration
      • Beijing, China, 100037
        • Cardiovascular institute & Fuwai Hospital- Thrombus Center
      • Guangzhou, China, 510120
        • The first affiliated hospital of guangzhou medical university-respiratory department
      • Shanghai, China, 200433
        • ngShanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Department of Pulmonary Circulation
      • Shenyang, China, 110016
        • The General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region,Congenital Heart Disease Department
      • Wuhan, China, 430022
        • Wuhan Asia Heart Hospital
      • Praha, Czechia, 128 08
        • Centre for PPH, Charles University , II Interni klinika1.LF a VFN
      • Le Kremlin-Bicêtre cedex, France, 94275
        • CHU de Bicêtre
      • Paris cedex 15, France, 75908
        • Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou Service de Pneumologie, soins intensifs et endoscopies bronchiques
      • Toulouse Cedex 9, France, 31059
        • CHU de Toulouse Hopital Larrey
      • Giessen, Germany, 35392
        • Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen
      • Heidelberg, Germany, 69126
        • Thoraxklinik am Universitatsklinikum Heidelberg
      • Würzburg, Germany, 97074
        • Missionsärztliche Klinik gGmbH Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Julius-Maximilians-Universität
      • Budapest, Hungary, 1125
        • Semmelweis Egyetem
      • Debrecen, Hungary, 4032
        • Debreceni Egyetem Orvos- és Egészségtudományi Centrum, Kardiológiai Klinika
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 3722
        • Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System
      • Kaunas, Lithuania, 50161
        • Lietuvos Sveikatos Mokslų Universiteto Ligoninės Kauno Klinikos Pulmonologijos-Imunologijos Klinika
      • Mexico City, Mexico, 14080
        • Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia (INC) Ignacio Chavez
      • Lublin, Poland, 20-718
        • Wojewódzki Szpital Specjalistyczny w Lublinie im. Stefana Kardynała Wyszyńskiego SPZOZ Oddział Kardiologii - Pododdział Intensywnego Nadzoru Kardiologicznego
      • Wrocaw, Poland, 51-124
        • Wojewódzki Szpital Specjalistyczny we Wrocawiu
      • Kemerovo, Russian Federation, 650002
        • Federal State Budgetary Institution "Scientific Research Institute of Systemic Problems of Cardiovascular Diseases", Siberian branch of RAMS
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 121552
        • Federal State Budgetary Institution "Russian Cardiology Scientific and Production Complex" of the Ministry of Health Care of the Russian Federation
      • Novosibirsk, Russian Federation, 630055
        • E.N.Meshalkin Novosibirsk State Research Institute Of Circulation Pathology Rosmedtechnology
      • St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, 197341
        • Federal State Institution "Federal center of Heart, Blood and Endocrinology named after V.A.Almazov Rosmedtekhnologies"
      • Tomsk, Russian Federation, 634012
        • Federal State Budgetary Institution "Research Institute for Cardiology" of Siberian Branch under the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences / Cardiovascular Surgery Department
      • Zürich, Switzerland, 8091
        • University Hospital Zurich
      • Bangkok, Thailand, 10330
        • King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Division of Respiratory and Respiratory Critical Care Medicine
      • Bangkok, Thailand, 10700
        • Siriraj Hospital, Division of Respiratory Disease and Tuberculosis
      • Chiang Mai, Thailand, 50200
        • MAHARAJ NAKORN CHIANG MAI HOSPITAL, Department of Internal Medicine
      • Capa_Istanbul, Turkey, 34093
        • Istanbul University İstanbul Faculty Medicine Pulmonology Department
      • Kyiv, Ukraine, 03680
        • State Institute Of Phthisiology And Pulmonology N.A. F.G. Yanovskiy Of Ams Ukraine
      • Lviv, Ukraine, 79014
        • Lviv Regional Clinical Hospital, Cardiosurgery Department
      • Cambridge, United Kingdom, CB23 3RE
        • Papworth Hospital NHS Trust, Pulmonary Vascular Diseases Unit
      • London, United Kingdom, W12 0HS
        • Hammersmith Hospital
      • Sheffield, United Kingdom, S10 2RX
        • Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Pulmonary Vascular Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 84 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Written informed consent
  • Subject with CTEPH (WHO Group 4) judged as inoperable due to the localization of the obstruction being surgically inaccessible (i.e., distal disease).
  • Female of childbearing potential must have a negative pre-treatment serum pregnancy test, be advised on appropriate methods of contraception, and agree to use 2 reliable methods of contraception.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous pulmonary endarterectomy.
  • Recurrent thromboembolism despite sufficient oral anticoagulants.
  • Symptomatic acute pulmonary embolism in the 6-month period prior to randomization.
  • Known moderate-to-severe restrictive lung disease (i.e., TLC < 60% of predicted value) or obstructive lung disease (i.e., FEV1 < 70% of predicted, with FEV1/FVC < 65%) or known significant chronic lung disease diagnosed by chest imaging (e.g., interstitial lung disease, emphysema).
  • Acute or chronic conditions (other than dyspnea) that limit the ability to comply with study requirements in the 3-month period prior to Screening visit or during the Screening period.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Macitentan
Macitentan 10 mg, oral tablet, to be taken once daily.
Macitentan 10 mg, oral tablet, to be taken once daily.
Other Names:
  • ACT-064992
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Matching placebo oral tablet, to be taken once daily.
Matching placebo oral tablet, to be taken once daily.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Pulmonary Vascular Resistance (PVR) at Rest.
Time Frame: From baseline to Week 16
The primary efficacy endpoint is defined as the PVR at rest at Week 16 expressed as percent of baseline PVR at rest.
From baseline to Week 16

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Exercise Capacity, as Measured by the 6-minute Walk Distance (6MWD).
Time Frame: From baseline to Week 24
The purpose of the six minute walk is to test exercise tolerance and capacity. The test measures the distance an individual is able to walk over a total of six minutes on a hard, flat surface. The goal is for the individual to walk as far as possible in six minutes.
From baseline to Week 24
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Borg Dyspnea Index Collected at the End of the 6-minute Walk Test (6MWT).
Time Frame: From baseline to Week 24
This outcome measures the difference in the Borg dyspnea index collected at the end of the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) at Week 24 compared to baseline. The Borg dyspnea index rates the severity of dyspnea (difficult or labored breathing) on a scale from 0 ('Nothing at all') to 10 ('Very, very severe - maximal'). A decrease in the Borg dyspnea index indicates an improvement.
From baseline to Week 24
Proportion of Subjects With Worsening in WHO Functional Class (FC) From Baseline to Week 24
Time Frame: From baseline to Week 24
WHO functional classes are defined as follows: 1) class I: no symptoms with exercise or at rest. No limitation of activity. 2) class II: No symptoms at rest but slight limitation with ordinary activities causing symptoms (e.g. short of breath with climbing a flight of stairs, grocery shopping, or making the bed). 3) class III: may not have symptoms at rest but activities greatly limited by shortness of breath, fatigue, or near fainting. 4) class IV: symptoms at rest (such as dyspnea and/or fatigue) and inability to carry out any physical activity without symptoms (e.g. may faint especially while bending over with their heads lowered). Patients in class IV manifest signs of right heart failure. Shifting to a higher class (e.g. from class III to class IV) represents a 'worsening' while shifting to a lower class (e.g. from class III to class II) means an 'improvement'.
From baseline to Week 24

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Kelly Papadakis, MD, Actelion

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 20, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 28, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

September 28, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 20, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

December 27, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 4, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 25, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Clinical Trials on Macitentan

3
Subscribe