A Study on the Safety and Efficacy of the SCu300A IUB Compared to the TCu380 Copper IUD

July 4, 2018 updated by: Ocon Medical Ltd.

A Prospective, Randomized, Single Blind, Two Arms Controlled Study of the Safety and Efficacy of the SCu300A IUB™ Spherical Copper Intrauterine Ball in Comparison to TCu 380 IUD Intra-uterine Contraceptive Device

This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the IUB SCu300A spherical copper IUD compared to the standard T shaped copper IUD, the TCu380.

Participants will be followed for one year and quality of life measurements will be measured during this period as well.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Netanya, Israel
        • Women's Health Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

25 years to 42 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

* Adult females aged 25-42

  • Free and willing to fully comply with treatment process
  • Healthy women seeking LARC
  • Married or in a steady relationship (at least 1 year)
  • Blood hemoglobin >11.5gr%
  • Signed informed consent form
  • If took COCP at least had one cycle after use of OC

Exclusion Criteria(major)

  • Use IUB/IUD as an emergency contraception
  • A previously placed IUD that has not been removed
  • Pregnancy or suspicion of pregnancy
  • Use of other contraception method (condom for either male or female, oral contraceptives, diaphragms, spermicides, hormonal patches, injections or ring, cervical cap)
  • History of pelvic inflammatory disease, recent or remote.
  • Postpartum endometritis or post abortal endometritis in the past 3 month
  • Mucopurulent cervicitis
  • Endometrial thickness more than 12 mm on insertion date
  • Known anemia
  • History of previous IUD complications
  • Dysfunctional uterine bleeding
  • Undiagnosed uterine bleeding
  • Malignancy or suspected malignant disease of female inner or outer genitalia
  • Distortions of the uterine cavity by uterine fibroids or known anatomical abnormalities
  • Known intolerance or allergy to nitinol or copper and/or copper IUDs - Wilson's disease.
  • Medication that may interfere with the subject's ability to complete the protocol
  • Use of injectable contraception in the previous year
  • Any other significant disease or condition that could interfere with the subject's ability to complete the protocol
  • A history of alcohol or drug abuse
  • Known infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C
  • Pregnancy or pregnancy planned during the year
  • Enrollment (less than 30 days after completing another study) in or planned to be enrolled in another study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: SCu300A IUB
Spherical copper contraceptive
Active Comparator: TCu380A
T-shaped copper IUD

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perforation rate
Time Frame: During device insertion
Number of subjects with partial or complete perforation through the uterine wall
During device insertion
Device expulsion
Time Frame: 12 months
Number of subjects with partially or fully ejected devices
12 months
Efficacy in preventing pregnancy
Time Frame: 12 months
Number of women who become pregnant during the trial period.
12 months
Device malposition
Time Frame: 12 months
Number of subjects with observed device malposition within the uterine cavity
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Menorrhagia and dysmenorrhea rates
Time Frame: 12 months
Recording of menstrual pain, cramps and irregular bleeding as reported by subjects.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 14, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 14, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

January 14, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 23, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 12, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

January 14, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 6, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 4, 2018

Last Verified

July 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • AOS-2000-05

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Reversible Prevention of Pregnancy

Clinical Trials on SCu300A IUB

Subscribe