Electroacupuncture Versus Fast-track Perioperative Program for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery

February 10, 2014 updated by: Simon S. M. Ng, Chinese University of Hong Kong

A Randomized Clinical Trial of Electroacupuncture Versus Fast-track Perioperative Program for Reducing Duration of Postoperative Ileus and Hospital Stay After Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery

Background: Our previous study demonstrated that electroacupuncture at Zusanli, Sanyinjiao, Hegu, and Zhigou reduces the duration of postoperative ileus and hospital stay after laparoscopic colorectal surgery within a traditional perioperative care setting. Recent evidence also suggested that a 'fast-track' perioperative program may help accelerate recovery after colorectal surgery. As electroacupuncture is simpler to implement and less labor intensive, it may be the preferred adjunct therapy if it is proven to be noninferior to fast-track program in reducing the duration of postoperative ileus and hospital stay after laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Objectives: To compare the efficacy of electroacupuncture and fast-track program in reducing the duration of postoperative ileus and hospital stay after laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Design: Prospective, randomized, noninferiority trial.

Subjects: One hundred sixty-four consecutive patients undergoing elective laparoscopic resection of colonic and upper rectal cancer will be recruited.

Interventions: Patients will be randomly allocated to receive either: (A) electroacupuncture with traditional perioperative care; or (B) fast-track program without acupuncture.

Outcome measures: Primary outcome: time to defecation. Secondary outcomes: duration of hospital stay, time of first passing flatus, time to resume diet, pain scores, analgesic requirement, morbidity, and medical costs.

Conclusions: This study will determine if electroacupuncture is noninferior to fast-track program in reducing the duration of postoperative ileus and hospital stay after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Electroacupuncture may be the preferred perioperative adjunct therapy to laparoscopic colorectal surgery because it is simpler to implement and less labor intensive than fast-track program.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

164

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Hong Kong, China
        • Recruiting
        • Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Tony WC Mak, MD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Consecutive patients undergoing elective laparoscopic resection of colonic and upper rectal cancer
  • Age of patients between 18 and 80 years
  • Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grading I-II
  • Patients with no severe physical disability
  • Patients who require no assistance with the activities of daily living
  • Informed consent available

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing laparoscopic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision, abdominoperineal resection, or total/proctocolectomy
  • Patients with planned stoma creation
  • Patients undergoing emergency surgery
  • Patients with evidence of peritoneal carcinomatosis
  • Patients with previous history of midline laparotomy
  • Patients who are expected to receive epidural opioids for postoperative pain management
  • Patients with cardiac pacemaker
  • Patients who are allergic to the acupuncture needles

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Electroacupuncture
Bilateral acupoints relevant to the treatment of abdominal pain, abdominal distension, and constipation, including Zusanli (stomach meridian ST-36), Sanyinjiao (spleen meridian SP-6), Hegu (large intestine meridian LI-4), and Zhigou (triple energizer meridian TE-6), will be used. Electric stimulation at a frequency of 50 Hz will be employed to the acupuncture needles.
Active Comparator: Fast-track program
The design of this program is based on the consensus between our surgeons, anesthetists, physiotherapists, dietitians, and nurses, who have reviewed the relevant literature and made appropriate adjustments to suit the local situation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to defecation
Time Frame: Up to 1 month
Measured in hours, from the time the laparoscopic surgery ends till the first observed passage of stool.
Up to 1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time of first passing flatus reported by the patients
Time Frame: Up to 1 month
Up to 1 month
Time that the patients tolerated solid diet
Time Frame: Up to 1 month
Up to 1 month
Time to walk independently
Time Frame: Up to 1 month
Up to 1 month
Readmission rate
Time Frame: Up to 1 month
Up to 1 month
Total postoperative hospital stay
Time Frame: Up to 1 month
Including hospital stay of patients who are readmitted within 30 days after surgery.
Up to 1 month
Pain scores on visual analog scale
Time Frame: Up to 1 month
From 0 which implies no pain at all, to 100 which implies the worst pain imaginable; assessed at 4, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after surgery.
Up to 1 month
Morbidity
Time Frame: Up to 1 month
Up to 1 month
Mortality
Time Frame: Up to 1 month
Up to 1 month
Quality of life
Time Frame: Up to 1 month
Quality of life at 2 and 4 weeks after surgery, measured by SF-36, EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR38 questionnaires
Up to 1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Simon S. M. Ng, MD, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2015

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 10, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 10, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

February 11, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 11, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 10, 2014

Last Verified

February 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Ileus

Clinical Trials on Electroacupuncture

3
Subscribe