Model-based Iterative Reconstruction (MB-IR VEOTM) in Ultra Low-dose Abdominal CT Versus Adaptative Statistical Iterative Reconstruction (ASIR): A Prospective Study for Acute Renal Colic (VEOLITH)

February 28, 2014 updated by: University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
The purpose of this study is to determine if Model-based iterative reconstruction (MB-IR VEOTM) in ultra low-dose abdominal CT as the same accuracy for the diagnosis of acute renal colic versus standard CT with adaptative statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Renal colic is a common recurrent pathology in young patients, multi explored by imaging such as CT and abdominal radiography.

Abdominal MDCT(MultiDetector Computed Tomography) without injection is the gold standard in diagnosis of acute flank pain suspect of renal colic due to high sensitivity (96%) and excellent specificity (100%).

The increased use of medical imaging examinations using ionizing radiation (+57 % between 2002 and 2007) makes it essential to optimize protocols, including CT-scans which represents 10.1 % of procedures and 58 % of the collective effective dose.

Model-based iterative reconstruction (MB-IR VEOTM) (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI) can use a low dose acquisition, reducing the effective dose delivered to the patient almost 80% comparing a standard CT with the last algorithm: adaptative statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR).

MB-IR VEOTM shows great potential for substantially reducing radiation doses at routine abdominal CT. ASIR is limited in this regard owing to reduced image quality and diagnostic capability. Further investigation is needed to determine the optimal dose level for MBIR(Model Base Iterative Reconstruction) that maintains adequate diagnostic performance. In general, objective and subjective image quality measurements do not necessarily correlate with diagnostic performance at ultralow-dose CT.

Objective:

Prospective clinical study, equivalence between two CT protocols for the diagnosis of acute renal colic.

Show that a low dose acquisition with model based iterative reconstruction (MB-IR VeoTM) is as good as a standard CT with adaptative statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) in the diagnosis acute renal colic

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Clermont-Ferrand, France, 63003
        • CHU de Clermont-Ferrand

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Informed and a written consent
  • Acute flank pain needed abdominal CT exploration.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Juvenile patients
  • Pregnant women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: VEO

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
acute renal colic
Time Frame: at day 1
at day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Measure of dose-length product
Time Frame: at day 1
at day 1
Measurements of subjective image quality
Time Frame: at day 1
at day 1
Evaluation of visceral fat
Time Frame: at ady 1
at ady 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 21, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

March 4, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 4, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2014

Last Verified

February 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe