Ovarian Reserve Modification After Lps Hysterectomy With Bilateral Salpingectomy

November 17, 2016 updated by: Fulvio Zullo, University Magna Graecia

The Effect in Term of Ovarian Reserve Modification of Adding Prophylactic Bilateral Salpingectomy (PBS) to TLH for Preventing Ovarian Cancer

The aim of this RCT of study is to compare the standard TLH with adnexal preservation with TLH plus prophylactic bilateral salpingectomy (PBS) in terms of ovarian reserve and surgical outcomes

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Ovarian cancer accounts for 3% of all female cancers and represents the fifth leading cause of cancer death in the Western world (1). In 90% of cases, these are epithelial ovarian cancers (2).

Because of the biological aggressiveness of this tumor and nonspecific symptoms, that causes a diagnosis at an advanced stage in 75% of cases, ovarian cancer is the gynecological cancer with the highest mortality rate (3).

To date, an effective screening strategy to the early diagnosis of ovarian cancer doesn't exist, so the prophylactic adnexectomy is the only available tool to reduce the incidence and the mortality rate, even if the role of this surgical strategy is controversial, especially in premenopausal women (4). In fact, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (ACOG) guidelines recommend the ovarian preservation in premenopausal women with no family history or other risk factors for ovarian cancer (5).

Some clinical studies have shown that the prophylactic adnexectomy and the consequent surgical menopause increase significantly the long term risk of cardiovascular and psychosexual diseases. (6-8). In particular, a case-control study done in a population of 29,380 women subjected to hysterectomy with and without adnexectomy, showed an increased risk of total mortality ( HRs 1.12 95 % CI 1:03 to 1:21 ), lethal and non- lethal cardiovascular disease ( HRs 1.17 95 % CI 1:02 to 1:35 ) and stroke ( HRs 1.14 95 % CI 0.98-1.33 ) (9) . In this population of women subjected to salpingectomy, the surgery wasn't able to lead to an improvement in general survival (10).

Considering the new histopathological classification of the epithelial ovarian cancer, proposed by Kurman (11) and based on new acquisitions about the pathogenesis and the origin of these tumors, it is possible to conceive a new preventive strategy associated with a less morbidity.

In fact, the carcinogenesis model proposed by Kurman, provides for the classification of the most important histological types of epithelial tumors into two types, diversified according to clinico-pathological and genetic features.

The type I is composed of low-grade serous, low-grade endometrioid, clear cell and mucinous carcinomas, whose the ovarian borderline tumors and endometriosis represent the pre-neoplastic lesions. Conversely, the II type includes high-grade endometrioid carcinomas, carcinosarcomas and undifferentiated carcinomas and, more frequently, high-grade serous carcinomas, whose preneoplastic lesion, now, seems to be represented by the serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC).

Plenty of evidence, to support the correlation between the epithelial ovarian cancer and the STIC, has been obtained by immunohistochemical and molecular genetics investigations (11). However, from a clinical point of view, this association has been demonstrated only by a study on 55 patients affected by a high-grade serous carcinoma, whose results have shown an involvement in the endosalpinx in 70% of cases and the presence of STIC in about 50% of cases (12).

Some studies, performed on BRCA1 / 2 populations, showed the presence of strongly sites reactive to p53, defined "p53 signature", in the distal tube (13). These sites seem to be more frequent and characteristically multifocal in those tubes with concomitant STIC (14). The finding of "p53 signature" may, therefore, identify an early clonal expansion of the neoplastic proliferation.

This new theory has given the opportunity to prevent this devastating type of cancer by the addition of the prophylactic bilateral salpingectomy (PBS, with the only removal of the tube and the preservation of the ovaries) in all surgical procedures performed in those women with benign diseases once they have accomplished their reproductive desire. The PBS, in place of the current standard procedure (bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy) could reduce the risk of cancer, improving at the same time the quality of life and reducing the risk of premature death due to cardiovascular disease, seen in women subjected to salpingo-oophorectomy before the onset of natural menopause.

Our preliminary data (17) show that, if the bilateral salpingectomy is performed with great care, no patient has negative effects in terms of ovarian function. In addition, in our experience, no perioperative complication is attributable to salpingectomy alone. Despite the retrospective design of our first study, according to the post hoc analysis, these data have shown a significant statistical reliability.

However, prospective data on the effetc of PBS in patients submitted to TLH are still needed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

167

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • CZ
      • Catanzaro, CZ, Italy, 88100
        • Recruiting
        • Chair of Obstetrics and Gynecology - University division - UMG

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

35 years to 50 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Indication to laparoscopic hysterectomy
  • Accomplished reproductive desire

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a family history of ovarian cancer and with a known mutation of the BRCA1/2 genes
  • Patients with a current or a past history of cancer
  • Patients who don't consent to the prophylactic salpingectomy
  • Previous adnexal surgery
  • PCOS
  • Estrogen-progestin therapy in the 2 months prior to the enrollment
  • Acute or chronic pelvic inflammatory disorders
  • Malignant gynecological neoplasms
  • Prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy
  • Autoimmune diseases, chronic, metabolic, endocrine and systemic disorders, including hyperandrogenism, hyperprolactinemia, diabetes mellitus and thyroid disease
  • Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism
  • Taking medications that can cause menstrual irregularities
  • Other clinical conditions

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: TLH_plus_PBS
TLH plus PBS
TLH plus PBS
Other Names:
  • Bilateral Salpingectomy
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: TLH _adnexal preservation
Standard TLH without PBS
TLH without PBS
Other Names:
  • Standard TLH without salpingectomy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ovarian reserve modification
Time Frame: Three months after laparoscopy
Ovarian reserve modification will be defined as the difference (expressed as Δ) between post-operative and pre-operative values of AMH, FSH, AFC, OV, VI, FI and VFI
Three months after laparoscopy

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Operative time
Time Frame: The same day of surgery
Time from skin incision to skin closure
The same day of surgery
variation of hemoglobin level
Time Frame: two hours after the end of surgery
two hours after the end of surgery
postoperative hospital stay
Time Frame: The day of patient discharge
The day of patient discharge
postoperative return to normal activity
Time Frame: two months after surgery
two months after surgery
complication rate
Time Frame: The day of patient discharge
The day of patient discharge

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2014

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2016

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 9, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2014

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

March 13, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 18, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 17, 2016

Last Verified

November 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pelvic Pain

Clinical Trials on PBS

Subscribe