Clinical Study Evaluating the Outcomes of a New Knee System with a Physiological Rollback Mechanism (K-06)

March 5, 2025 updated by: Limacorporate S.p.a

A Multicentre, Prospective Clinical Study Evaluating the Outcomes of a New Knee System with a Physiological Rollback Mechanism

The aim of this study is to assess the clinical, radiographic and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after total knee replacement with Physica KR, define the survivorship of the implants and identify possible risk factors that may lead to failure.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

156

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Florence, Italy, 50134
        • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi
    • Dorset
      • Bournemouth, Dorset, United Kingdom, BH7 7DW
        • The Royal Bournemouth Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust
      • Dorchester, Dorset, United Kingdom, DT1 2JY
        • Dorset County Hospital Nhs Foundation Trust

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

22 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male and females
  2. Age 22-80 years
  3. Any race
  4. Ambulatory patients
  5. Patients who have a medical condition with over 5 years of life expectancy
  6. Patients requiring knee prosthesis, suitable for the use of Physica KR
  7. Patients with painful primary knee osteoarthritis
  8. Patients with painful secondary knee osteoarthritis
  9. Patients who are suffering from inflammatory arthritis (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis)
  10. Patients who have undamaged and functional collateral and posterior cruciate ligaments
  11. Patients with a flexion greater than or equal to 90° on the affected side
  12. Patients with a fixed flexion contracture less than 10°
  13. Patients who understand the conditions of the study and are willing and able to comply with the prescribed rehabilitation and to perform all scheduled follow-up visits
  14. Patients who have signed the Ethics Committee approved study-specific Informed Consent Form prior to the surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Obese patients with BMI above 35 kg/m2 (severe obesity)
  2. Previous partial knee replacement (unilateral, bicompartimental or patellofemoral joint replacement), patellectomy, high tibial osteotomy or femoral osteotomy in the affected knee
  3. Primary Total Knee Replacement (TKR) in the affected knee
  4. Varus or Valgus deformity greater than 20°
  5. Patients with a fixed flexion contracture greater than 10°
  6. Previous knee replacement on the contralateral side within the last year and whose outcome is achieving an KSS< 70 points
  7. Patients with symptomatic OA of the hips, spine, ankles, if it can interfere with the evaluation of the target knee
  8. Patients with active or any suspected infection (on the affected knee or systemic)
  9. Muscular insufficiency or absence of muscoligamentous supporting structures required for adequate soft tissue balance
  10. Patients with known or suspicious metal hypersensitivity
  11. Recurrent medical history of severe allergic or immune-mediated reactions
  12. Vascular insufficiency of lower limbs severe enough to interfere with the study evaluation
  13. Current treatment or treatment within the previous 2 years before the screening visit for malignant and life-threatening non-malignant disorders
  14. Any clinically significant pathology based on clinical history that the Investigator feels may affect the study evaluation
  15. Any intercurrent chronic disease or condition that may interfere with the completion of the 5-year follow-up, such as liver disease, severe coronary disease, alcohol or drug abuse, disordered mental state, or other clinically significant condition
  16. Patients who have significant neurological or musculoskeletal disorders or disease that may adversely affect gait and compromise functional recovery and evaluation
  17. Patients who have neuromuscular or neurosensory deficit which would limit the ability to assess the performance of the device
  18. Patients with systemic or metabolic disorders leading to progressive bone deterioration
  19. Patients who have a medical condition with less 5 years of life expectancy
  20. Previous organ transplant surgery
  21. Any psychiatric illness that would prevent comprehension of the details and nature of the study
  22. Participation in any experimental drug/device study within the 6 months prior to the screening visit
  23. Female patients who are pregnant, nursing, or planning a pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Physica KR

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Knee Society Clinical Rating System (KSS)
Time Frame: From baseline to 5 year follow up
From baseline to 5 year follow up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Time Frame: From baseline to 5 year follow-up
From baseline to 5 year follow-up
Oxford Knee Score (OKS)
Time Frame: From baseline to 5 year follow-up
From baseline to 5 year follow-up
Satisfaction Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: From baseline to 5 year follow-up
From baseline to 5 year follow-up
Survival rate of the implant
Time Frame: at 3 and 5 year follow-up
at 3 and 5 year follow-up
Incidence of AE/SAE, ADE/SADE
Time Frame: From baseline to 5 year follow-up
From baseline to 5 year follow-up
Forgotten Joint score (FJS)
Time Frame: From baseline to 5 year follow-up
From baseline to 5 year follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 11, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2014

First Posted (Estimated)

April 21, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 5, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • K-06 Physica KR

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Primary Total Knee Replacement

Clinical Trials on Physica KR

Subscribe