Fluoroscopic Analysis of Total Knee Replacement With a Kinematic Retaining or a Posterior Stabilized Design

March 6, 2017 updated by: Limacorporate S.p.a

In Vivo Kinematic Analysis of Total Knee Replacement With a Kinematic Retaining or a Posterior Stabilized Design During Activities of Daily Living

The aim of this study is to evaluate the in vivo kinematics of TKA performed with two different prosthesis: a kinematic retaining (Physica KR) and a posterior-stabilized (Physica PS) design by means of fluoroscopic analysis during activities of daily living (rising from a chair, stairs climbing, leg extension). In comparison with asymptomatic knee. Patterns of femoral rollback will be analyzed to assess if they are motor-task dependent and correlated with clinical outcomes.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

34

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Trento, Italy, 38122
        • Ospedale San Camillo

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients submitted to Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with Physica KR or PS;
  2. Patients with an appropriate initial fixation and stability of the knee prosthesis;
  3. Patients achieving a minimum flexion of 100° or a Knee Society Score (KSS) ≥ 65 (fair/good postoperative outcome) at 6-month follow-up;
  4. Patients affected by primary or secondary Osteoarthritis (OA) before surgery;
  5. Patients who understand the requirements of the study and are willing and able to comply with activities required for fluoroscopic examination;
  6. Patients who have signed the Ethics Committee approved study-specific Informed Consent Form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with misalignment or axial malrotation of the knee prosthesis;
  2. Patients not able to achieve a minimum flexion of 100° or with a KSS Knee Score ≤ 65 points at 6-month follow-up;
  3. Patients who had or have planned a surgery on their uninvolved knee within a year;
  4. Muscular insufficiency or absence of muscololigamentous supporting structures required for adequate soft tissue balance;
  5. Patients who have significant neurological or musculoskeletal disorders or disease that may adversely affect gait and compromise functional recovery and evaluation;
  6. Patients who have neuromuscular or neurosensory deficit which would limit the ability to assess the performance of the device;
  7. Any psychiatric illness that would prevent comprehension of the details and nature of the study;
  8. Participation in any experimental drug/device study within the 6 months prior to the screening visit
  9. Female patients who are pregnant, nursing, or planning a pregnancy due to x-rays exposition.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Physica KR
Patients who have received a Physica KR total knee implant.
Kinematic retaining total knee implant
Other: Physica PS
Patients who have received a Physica PS total knee implant.
Posterior stabilized total knee implant

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of the roll-back mechanism measured with the tibio-femoral contact points at different degrees of flexion
Time Frame: 6 months
Using a software to replicate the movement using Computer-aided design (CAD) models. The movement is studied and the distance made by the femur on the tibia is calculated giving the information of the roll back.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Luca Marega, MD, Ospedale San Camillo, Trento

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 7, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 7, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

March 11, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 7, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2017

Last Verified

September 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • K-10

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Total Knee Replacement

Clinical Trials on Physica KR

Subscribe