- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02118649
Enhancing Behavior and Brain Response to Visual Targets Using a Computer Game
Participants will play a computer game that is controlled by their gaze patterns and designed to direct attention their attention to specific on-screen targets. Visual attention to targets will be rewarded. Both visual behavior and brain response will be recorded during game play.
It is hypothesized that that, over the course of the game, relative to baseline, participants will show (a) increased looking to targets, (b) decreased response time to targets, and (c) enhanced, more efficient neural response to visual cues. It is hypothesized that clinical variability will associate with visual attention and brain response.
Study Overview
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Connecticut
-
New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06520
- Yale Child Study Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Able to participate in an eye-tracking experiment
- Able to participate in an EEG experiment
Exclusion Criteria:
- Sensory or physical impairment that would preclude completion of protocol
- Participants taking prescription medications that may affect cognitive processes
- Participants reporting significant head trauma or history of seizures
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Game
Participants will play a video game directing their gaze to on-screen targets.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
EEG brain response to targets
Time Frame: Measures will be recorded for the duration of their visit, an expected average of 3 hours.
|
Measures will be recorded for the duration of their visit, an expected average of 3 hours.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Visual attention to targets as measured by eye-tracking
Time Frame: Measures will be recorded for the duration of their visit, an expected average of 3 hours.
|
Measures will be recorded for the duration of their visit, an expected average of 3 hours.
|
|
Social Responsiveness Scale, Second Edition
Time Frame: Measures will be collected during visit, an expected average of 3 hours.
|
Measures will be collected during visit, an expected average of 3 hours.
|
|
Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule
Time Frame: Measures will be collected during visit, an expected average of 3 hours.
|
Measures will be collected during visit, an expected average of 3 hours.
|
|
Differential Abilities Scale
Time Frame: Measures will be collected during visit, an expected average of 3 hours.
|
Measures will be collected during visit, an expected average of 3 hours.
|
|
Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition
Time Frame: Measures will be collected during visit, an expected average of 3 hours.
|
Measures will be collected during visit, an expected average of 3 hours.
|
|
Social Anxiety Scale for Children, Revised
Time Frame: Measures will be collected during visit, an expected average of 3 hours.
|
Measures will be collected during visit, an expected average of 3 hours.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: James McPartland, Yale University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Hutt C, Ounsted C. The biological significance of gaze aversion with particular reference to the syndrome of infantile autism. Behav Sci. 1966 Sep;11(5):346-56. doi: 10.1002/bs.3830110504. No abstract available.
- Senju A, Tojo Y, Yaguchi K, Hasegawa T. Deviant gaze processing in children with autism: an ERP study. Neuropsychologia. 2005;43(9):1297-306. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.12.002. Epub 2005 Jan 24.
- Senju A, Yaguchi K, Tojo Y, Hasegawa T. Eye contact does not facilitate detection in children with autism. Cognition. 2003 Aug;89(1):B43-51. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(03)00081-7.
- Tanaka JW, Wolf JM, Klaiman C, Koenig K, Cockburn J, Herlihy L, Brown C, Stahl S, Kaiser MD, Schultz RT. Using computerized games to teach face recognition skills to children with autism spectrum disorder: the Let's Face It! program. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2010 Aug;51(8):944-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02258.x.
- Tanaka JW, Wolf JM, Klaiman C, Koenig K, Cockburn J, Herlihy L, Brown C, Stahl SS, South M, McPartland JC, Kaiser MD, Schultz RT. The perception and identification of facial emotions in individuals with autism spectrum disorders using the Let's Face It! Emotion Skills Battery. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2012 Dec;53(12):1259-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02571.x. Epub 2012 Jul 11.
- Charlop-Christy MH, Le L, Freeman KA. A comparison of video modeling with in vivo modeling for teaching children with autism. J Autism Dev Disord. 2000 Dec;30(6):537-52. doi: 10.1023/a:1005635326276.
- Gena A, Couloura S, Kymissis E. Modifying the affective behavior of preschoolers with autism using in-vivo or video modeling and reinforcement contingencies. J Autism Dev Disord. 2005 Oct;35(5):545-56. doi: 10.1007/s10803-005-0014-9.
- Wilson KP. Teaching social-communication skills to preschoolers with autism: efficacy of video versus in vivo modeling in the classroom. J Autism Dev Disord. 2013 Aug;43(8):1819-31. doi: 10.1007/s10803-012-1731-5.
- Klin A, Jones W, Schultz R, Volkmar F, Cohen D. Defining and quantifying the social phenotype in autism. Am J Psychiatry. 2002 Jun;159(6):895-908. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.6.895.
- Landa RJ, Holman KC, O'Neill AH, Stuart EA. Intervention targeting development of socially synchronous engagement in toddlers with autism spectrum disorder: a randomized controlled trial. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2011 Jan;52(1):13-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02288.x. Epub 2010 Dec 3.
- Constantino, J. N., & Gruber, C. P. (2012). The Social Responsiveness Scale, Second Edition. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
- Lord, C., Rutter, M., DiLavore, P. C., & Risi, S. (1999). Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule - WPS (ADOS-WPS), Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
- Elliott C. Differential Ability Scales: Second Edition (DAS-II). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation. 2007.
- Sparrow, S. S., Balla, D., Cicchetti, D. (1984). Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales. Circle Pines, MN, American Guidance Service.
- La Greca AM, Lopez N. Social anxiety among adolescents: linkages with peer relations and friendships. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1998 Apr;26(2):83-94. doi: 10.1023/a:1022684520514.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 14-10788
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.