Sternal ECG Patch Comparison Trial

June 25, 2014 updated by: Bardy Diagnostics, Inc.

Comparison of a Sternal ECG Patch With a Standard Recording System for Holter Monitoring

This study is intended to compare the new Carnation Ambulatory Monitoring (CAM) System, a patch monitoring system, with the Holter monitoring system. Holters represent the current standard for continuous recording of the ECG over extended periods.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The purpose of this research is to simplify the system of recording ECGs. Carnation Ambulatory Monitoring (CAM) System is a small patch system that can be worn during most activities include showering. Each patient will be his or her own control, and will wear the CAM and Holter systems simultaneously for 24 hours. Both systems will then be sent out for analysis.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

50

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Auckland, New Zealand, 1142
        • Auckland City Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Warren Smith, MBChB

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Cardiac patients at Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Syncope of uncertain etiology or
  • Pre-syncope of uncertain etiology or
  • Palpitations of uncertain etiology or
  • Management of known AF/SVT patients

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any dermatitis or infected skin over the sternum (Carnation patch) or left upper anterior thorax (Zio patch).
  • A sternal or thoracic incision that extends under the patch within 3 months from the date of enrollment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ECG signal quality
Time Frame: 24 hours of patient use, plus shipping and analysis time ~ 2 weeks
ECG signal quality = scoring the ability of each system to record electrical activity from the atrium (P-waves). The Physician Event Committee will independently score the P-waves from all recordings, using the following scale: Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor, Non-existent. Diagnostic yield will also be assessed.
24 hours of patient use, plus shipping and analysis time ~ 2 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Device comfort
Time Frame: 24 hours
Secondary outcome measures will include Human Factors performance of the 2 systems, which will be scored and compared in the following areas and duration of patch adherence: skin irritation, comfort, contact and stability.
24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Jon Hunt, PhD, Bardy Diagnostics, Inc. (sponsor)
  • Principal Investigator: Warren Smith, MBChB, Auckland City Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2014

Study Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 28, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

April 30, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 26, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 25, 2014

Last Verified

June 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atrial Fibrillation

3
Subscribe