A Survey of Google Glass by Orthopaedic Trauma Patients and Surgeons (GoogleGlass)

A Survey-driven Evaluation of Patients Response to the Introduction of Google Glass in the Orthopaedic Trauma Clinic

Patients seen in the Orthopaedic Trauma clinic will be asked to consent for potential video/picture recording using the Google Glass device during their visit with the orthopaedic surgeon or resident.

The investigators want to record the patient's level of acceptance and response to this new technology. There are two arms: Patients seen by a doctor wearing the Google Glass device and those that will not be exposed. Both groups will be asked to complete a survey after their clinic visit.

The device users (doctor) will complete a survey which will evaluate how effective this new tool is in the Orthopaedic clinical setting.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Google Glass is a new low-profile wearable technology that allows physicians to record hands-free video and pictures and to directly video link and communicate with other wearers of this device. In addition to this, the device has a heads up display that is capable of searching the internet on voice command. The device has the same functionality as a smart phone with the benefit of being hands-free and wearable. The device is currently in a beta testing period where "Explorers" are accepted by application to a program to use and assess the device. The investigators have been able to obtain three of these devices.

The Google Glass device has the ability to help improve connectivity between physicians not in the same locale, increase efficiency and provide better access to vital information used in a medical and surgical setting. The device has clear teaching implications and will enable academic physicians to disseminate information to more students and in situations not previously possible. As the device evolves its potential to do more will likely develop further. It is important to assess the impact of this rapidly growing field on patient sentiment and wellbeing. As this is a very new device, very few studies have been done to assess its application in Medicine and specifically orthopaedic surgery. So far only very specific and small studies have been done with regard to immunochromatographic analysis, pharmacology, forensic medicine and Parkinson's disease. The investigators are aiming to assess the applications and patient perspective of this device on a much larger scale. The investigators feel this technology and its future offspring could be polarizing with regard to patient response. This could be an important element to consider in the future development of its clinical applications.

There are no direct medical risks to the patient. No decisions regarding patient care will be dependent on the device.

Study Objective Primary question: What is the patient's level of acceptance and response to this new technology? Secondary question: From a doctor's perspective, how effective is this new tool in the Orthopaedic clinical setting?

Design Patients seen in the Orthopaedic Trauma clinic will be asked to consent for potential video/picture recording using the Google Glass device during their visit with the orthopaedic surgeon or resident. Eligible patients will be assigned to one of two consulting rooms: one with the Google Glass device, one without.

Patients will therefore have a 50.50 chance of encountering the Google Glass.

Any images or videos taken will not show the patients face, all measures will be taken to ensure confidentiality. Both groups will be asked to complete a small survey on a locked password protected iPad after their visit so as to record their acceptability of this new technology in a clinical setting. Participants that experienced the device will also be required to comment on their experience. The device user (surgeon/resident) will also complete a survey so as to record their experience using the hands free camera and recording device.

The information gathered will be saved on a password protected drive and will be used for discussion and analysis between the investigators to help develop the potential future teaching and clinical applications of the device.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

127

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3G 1A4
        • Montreal General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients seen in the Montreal general Hospital (MGH) - Orthopaedic Trauma Clinic and capable of reading French or English.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • All patients that have cognitive impairment or language difficulties that would impede completion of the survey will be excluded from the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Google Glass
Investigators using Google Glass during clinic visit
The device is a wearable, voice-controlled Android device that resembles a pair of eyeglasses and displays information directly in the user's field of vision
No Intervention: No Google Glass
Investigator will not be using Google Glass during clinic visit

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Patient Evaluation Survey
Time Frame: Day one
Day one

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Surgeon Evaluation Survey
Time Frame: Day one
Day one

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Edward J Harvey, MDCM FRCSC, RI-MUHC

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 30, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 24, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 19, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

August 20, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 15, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 13, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SDR 14.135
  • RI-MUHC - MGH (Other Identifier: RI-MUHC - Montreal General Hospital)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Trauma

Clinical Trials on Google Glass

Subscribe