The Value of Surgical Mediastinal Staging in Clinical N1 Lung Cancer (ASTER3)

July 22, 2017 updated by: Johnny Moons

Assessment of Surgical Mediastinal sTaging in cN1 Lung canceR

In case of PET or CT based cN1 (suspected) NSCLC, ESTS guidelines propose mediastinal staging by echo-endoscopy OR mediastinoscopy. Recent data show a sensitivity of less than 50% for echo-endoscopy to detect N2 disease in cN1 NSCLC patients, while prevalence of mediastinal nodal disease was 24% (unpublished data Aster II).2 The investigators plan to perform a prospective multicentric observational study to measure the sensitivity of mediastinal staging by video-assisted mediastinoscopy (VAM) in cN1 operable and resectable (suspected) NSCLC patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Few reports in the literature evaluated the final pathological stage distribution of patients with resectable and operable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with clinical stage cN1. These retrospective series demonstrated that patients with computed tomography (CT) based cN1 often had clinically occult mediastinal lymph node metastases (N2/3 disease). Hishida et al. reported that 30% of 143 patients with cN1 were diagnosed N2/3 by mediastinoscopy3. Watanabe et al. reported that 37% of 168 patients with cN1 were diagnosed N2/3 by mediastinoscopy 4. Adding FDG-positron emission tomography (PET) to CT might enable the detection of N2/3 disease among these cN1 patients, but negative PET findings do not necessarily exclude N2/3 disease. Kim et al reported that 19,2 % of 99 patients with cN1, in whom cN2 was ruled out by PET-CT scan, were found to have pathologic N2 disease at pulmonary resection with mediastinal lymph node dissection.5 In conclusion, 20-30% of patients with cN1 nodes on imaging, and normal sized FDG-negative mediastinal lymph nodes on CT and PET have malignant involvement in their mediastinal nodes.

The ACCP guidelines state that invasive preoperative mediastinal staging should be performed in these cN1 patients 6. The updated ESTS guidelines recommend mediastinal staging by echo-endoscopic or mediastinoscopy.1 Non-randomized trials suggested the potential of linear endosonography for mediastinal staging 7-9. However, the patients with cN1 disease form only a minority in these studies. A recently performed prospective ASTER 2 trial (N=100) showed a sensitivity of echo-endoscopic for mediastinal staging of 38% (ITT analysis), while the prevalence of mediastinal nodal disease was 24% (unpublished data Aster 2) 2. The conclusion made by ASTER 2 is that a negative endosonography must be followed by a VAM. However, the investigators consider such double approach not cost-effective in a setting with N2 prevalence <30%. Therefore, it seems reasonable to perform a VAM instead of an endosonography in cN1 patients, which is one of the proposed strategies in the recent ESTS guidelines.1 However, there is no prospective study to date that assessed the sensitivity, NPV and accuracy of VAM in a well-defined group of cN1 patients.

Several publications have demonstrated a lobe-specific mediastinal nodal drainage for upper versus lower lobe NSCLC. Shapiro et al conclude that in early lung cancer, including cN1 disease, lobe-specific mediastinal dissection is warranted 10. However, in this study the only patient with a positive subcarinal node, upper lobe tumour, and negative superior mediastinal nodes had positive N1 nodes. To the investigators knowledge there is no study focussing on mediastinal nodal dissemination patterns in cN1 patients.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

105

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Leuven, Belgium, 3000
        • University Hospital Leuven
      • Marseille, France, 13915
        • Aix-Marseille University & Hospitals System of Marseille (AP-HM)
      • Berlin, Germany, 13125
        • ELK Berlin Chest Hospital
      • Freiburg, Germany, 79106
        • Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg
      • Koblenz, Germany, 56073
        • Katholisches Klinikum Koblenz
      • Koblenz, Germany, 56073
        • Katholisches Klinikum, Thoraxchirurgie
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08017
        • Hospital Universitari Mútua Terrassa
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08036
        • Hospital Clinic; Barcelona University
      • Zurich, Switzerland, 8091
        • University Hospital, Division of Thoracic Surgery
      • Istanbul, Turkey, 81080
        • Istanbul University, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with operable and resectable cT1-2- selectedT3 cN1 (suspected) NSCLC. (selected T3 = intraparenchymal tumour >7cm or T3 chest wall or T3 additional nodule, excluding mediastinal invasion or invasion of the main bronchus < 2cm from the carina)

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

(Suspected) NSCLC Medical operable and surgical resectable cT1, cT2 selected cT3 (i.e. intraparenchymal tumour >7cm, T3 chest wall, or T3 based on additional nodule in the lobe of the primary tumour) cN1 based on CT or PET 18 years or older Informed Consent

Exclusion Criteria:

History of mediastinoscopy No integrated FDG PET/CT available No videomediastinoscopy available EBUS/EUS for mediastinal staging of present N1 disease cN2: mediastinal nodes enlarged on CT or Pet positive invasion of mediastinal pleura invasion of phrenic nerve invasion of parietal pericardium tumour in main bronchus less than 2cm form the main carina cT4 cM1 former therapy for lung cancer (chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery) technical contraindication for videomediastinoscopy ( eg extreme kyphosis, cutaneous tracheostomy, extreme goiter) pregnancy inability to consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
VAM

Patients with operable and resectable cT1-2-selected T3 cN1cM0 NSCLC undergo VAM for mediastinal lymph node staging. After VAM, patients without tissue proof of N2/3 disease at surgical staging undergo a VATS or thoracotomy with systematic lymph node dissection during the same anaesthesia or at a later stage.

Sensitivity, NPV and accuracy of staging with VAM will be calculated. Provided N2 lymph node metastases are proven by VAM the patient goes off study protocol and can further be assessed/treated according to local clinical practice.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity of VAM
Time Frame: at surgery (VAM)
Sensitivity (%) of surgical mediastinal staging by video-assisted mediastinoscopy in clinical N1; true positives (TP) = cN1 and pN1 - false negatives (FP) = cN1 and pN2/3; sensitivity is calculated as TP / (TP+FN)
at surgery (VAM)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prevalence of N2/3 disease after VAM
Time Frame: at surgery (VAM)
% of patients with cN1 disease who show pN2/3 disease after VAM
at surgery (VAM)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Herbert Decaluwé, MD, Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

May 30, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 18, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 19, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

August 21, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 25, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 22, 2017

Last Verified

July 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Non Small Cell Lung Cancer

3
Subscribe