Optimal Dose of Proton Pump Inhibitors Following an Upper Gastrointestinal Bleed

June 29, 2017 updated by: University of Missouri-Columbia
Despite recommendations from clinical practice guidelines to discharge patients from the hospital on once daily proton pump inhibitors after acute management of UGIB, clinical practice is to use twice daily proton pump inhibitor therapy. The objective of this study will be to assess whether or not once daily pantoprazole is non-inferior to twice daily pantoprazole in ulcer healing with a dose of once daily versus twice daily proton-pump inhibitor following an upper gastrointestinal bleed. Additionally, this study will observe for any potential difference in safety for once daily versus twice daily proton pump inhibitors.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

There are few clinical practice guidelines for the management of a non-variceal, upper gastrointestinal bleed (UGIB). The 2012 guidelines released by the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) indicate that for active bleeding or non-bleeding visible vessels or adherent clot, a bolus of 80 mg proton pump inhibitor followed by continuous infusion of 8 mg/hr infusion is to be used. Following 72 hours of infusion therapy, an oral proton pump inhibitor (PPI) may be used. If the clot is a flat pigmented spot or a clean ulcer base, an oral proton pump inhibitor may be used for management (without infusion) (Laine 2012). There are no recommendations made on once versus twice daily proton pump inhibitor. The 2010 American College of Physicians guideline recommends following the 72-hour infusion with once-daily proton pump inhibitors for duration as dictated by underlying etiology following upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) (Barkun 2012). This recommendation is graded 1C, with the decision to support once-daily over twice-daily dosing due to demonstrated effective ulcer healing for patients with peptic ulcer disease with once-daily dosing, and insufficient data to suggest twice-daily is superior to once-daily. There have been no head-to-head trials to evaluate once-daily versus twice-daily proton pump inhibitor following acute management of an endoscopic bleed. Additionally, studies suggest about 50% to 60% of proton pump inhibitors are being used without appropriate indications or at inappropriate dosages (Ali 2009).Safety concerns such as increased risk for Clostridium difficile infection , community acquired pneumonia, electrolyte abnormalities (hypomagnesemia), and fractures are becoming more prevalent warranting improved risk versus benefit examination of proton pump inhibitors including ascertainment of least effective dosing (Ali 2009, Sheen 2011). Despite recommendations to discharge patients after acute management of UGIB on once daily PPI therapy, clinical practice is to use twice daily proton pump inhibitor therapy. The objective of this study will be to examine if once daily pantoprazole is non-inferior to twice daily pantoprazole with regards to ulcer healing after acute management of an UGIB. In addition, because more evidence is emerging regarding safety concerns with proton pump inhibitors, the study will seek to examine if once daily versus twice daily therapy results in difference in safety or adverse reactions such as occurrence of rebleed, C. difficile diarrhea, or pneumonia.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

3

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Missouri
      • Columbia, Missouri, United States, 65112
        • University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult, 18 years and older; Upper GI bleed confirmed by endoscopy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Intensive Care Unit admission, Emergency endoscopic intervention required to control bleeding, Malignant appearing ulcers as determined by endoscopy, Previous documented treatment with twice daily PPI for other indication, Receiving twice daily PPI therapy prior to admission

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Pantoprazole twice daily
Pantoprazole 40mg orally twice daily x 8 weeks after acute management of UGIB
Pantoprazole 40mg orally daily x 8 weeks after acute management of UGIB
Other Names:
  • Protonix
Active Comparator: Pantoprazole once daily
Pantoprazole 40mg orally once daily x 8 weeks after acute management of UGIB
Pantoprazole 40mg orally daily x 8 weeks after acute management of UGIB
Other Names:
  • Protonix

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ulcer Healing
Time Frame: 8 weeks
as defined by follow-up endoscopy per gastroenterology service, 8 weeks after UGIB acute management
8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of Rebleed
Time Frame: 8 weeks

Per patient report or as defined by follow-up endoscopy per gastroenterology service, 8 weeks after UGIB acute management

High clinical suspicion of rebleed includes melena, hematochezia, confirmed by repeat endoscopy, requiring additional management

8 weeks
Clostridium Difficile Diarrhea
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Clostridium difficile confirmed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
8 weeks
Community-Acquired Pneumonia
Time Frame: 8 weeks
As defined by clinical suspicion and/or positive sputum culture requiring antibiotic treatment
8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ashley M Ausmus, Pharm.D., University of Missouri-Health Care

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 17, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

August 17, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 5, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 8, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

September 9, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 31, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 29, 2017

Last Verified

June 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Upper Gastrointestinal Bleed

Clinical Trials on Pantoprazole

3
Subscribe