Efficacy of Vortioxetine Versus Escitalopram on Cognitive Function in Patients With Inadequate Response to Current Antidepressant Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder

February 27, 2017 updated by: H. Lundbeck A/S

An Interventional, Randomised, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Active-comparator, Flexible-dose Study on the Efficacy of Vortioxetine Versus Escitalopram on Cognitive Dysfunction in Patients With Inadequate Response to Current Antidepressant Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder

This study aims at evaluating the effect of vortioxetine on cognitive dysfunction in major depressive disorder (MDD) patients with inadequate response to current antidepressant treatment.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

101

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Helsinki, Finland
        • FI005
      • Kuopio, Finland
        • FI001
      • Kupio, Finland
        • FI006
      • Tampere, Finland
        • FI007
      • Turku, Finland
        • FI004
      • Bochum, Germany
        • DE005
      • Mittweida, Germany
        • DE004
      • Belgrade, Serbia
        • RS002
      • Belgrade, Serbia
        • RS003
      • Belgrade, Serbia
        • RS004
      • Belgrade, Serbia
        • RS005
      • Kragujevac, Serbia
        • RS001
      • Bratislava, Slovakia
        • SK004
      • Hronovce, Slovakia
        • SK001
      • Levice, Slovakia
        • SK003
      • Rimavska Sobota, Slovakia
        • SK002

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The patient has MDD, diagnosed according to DSM-IV-TR™ recurrent MDE (classification 296.3x) as confirmed using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI).
  • The patient has depressive symptoms currently considered as non- or only partially responsive (inadequate response), to one adequate course of SSRI/SNRI antidepressant monotherapy and is candidate for a switch in the investigator's opinion.
  • The patient wants to stop taking his/her current SSRI/SNRI treatment due to inadequate response confirmed by the Antidepressant Treatment Response Questionnaire (ATRQ), <50% response to current treatment).
  • The patient must have been treated by SSRI/SNRI monotherapy (citalopram, paroxetine, sertraline, duloxetine, or venlafaxine) for at least 6 weeks at licensed doses prior to the Screening Visit.
  • The patient has a PHQ-9 total score ≥14.
  • The patient has a MADRS total score ≥ 22.
  • The patient has had the current MDE for ≤1 year.
  • The patient has a Perceived Deficits Questionnaire - Depression (PDQ-D) total score >25.
  • The patient is a man or woman aged ≥18 and ≤65 years.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The patient has a score ≥70 on the DSST (Number of Correct Symbols) at the Baseline Visit.
  • The patient has physical, cognitive, or language impairment of such severity as to adversely affect the validity of the data derived from the neuropsychological tests.
  • The patient has any current psychiatric disorder or Axis I disorder (according to DSMIV-TR™ criteria) other than MDD, as assessed using MINI.
  • The patient has a current or has had a diagnosis of dysthymic disorder within 3 months preceding the onset of current episode (DSM-IV-TR™ criteria).
  • The patient has borderline, schizotypal, schizoid, paranoid, histrionic, antisocial personality disorders (axis II) as comorbid or primary diagnosis (DSM-IV-TR™ criteria).
  • The patient has history of previous MDEs considered as treatment resistant defined as inadequate response (incomplete or no therapeutic response) to two prior courses of at least 6 weeks of conventional antidepressant drugs in adequate dosages or, the patient has treatment-resistant depression in the investigator's judgement.
  • The patient suffers from personality disorders, mental retardation, pervasive development disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, organic mental disorders, or mental disorders due to a general medical condition (DSM-IV-TR™ criteria).
  • The patient has a diagnosis of alcohol or other substance abuse or dependence (excluding nicotine or caffeine) (DSM-IV-TR™ criteria) that has not been in sustained full remission at least 2 years prior to the Screening Visit.
  • The patient has a current diagnosis or history of manic or hypomanic episode, schizophrenia or any other psychotic disorder, including major depression with psychotic features (DSM-IV-TR™ criteria).

Other protocol defined inclusion and exclusion criteria may apply.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Escitalopram 10-20 mg
Encapsulated tablets once daily for 8 weeks
Experimental: Vortioxetine 10-20 mg
Encapsulated tablets once daily for 8 weeks
Other Names:
  • Lu AA21004
  • Brintellix®

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST)
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 8
The DSST is recognised as covering all of the cognitive performance aspects: speed of processing, executive functioning, and attention
Baseline to Week 8

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT)
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 8
Learning [acquisition] and memory [delayed recall])
Baseline to Week 8
Change in Trail Making Test A (TMT-A)
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 8
Speed of processing
Baseline to Week 8
Change in Trail Making Test B (TMT-B)
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 8
Executive functioning
Baseline to Week 8
Change in Reaction time score; CRT attention
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 8
Baseline to Week 8
Change in reaction time score SRT - simple reaction time
Time Frame: Baseline to week 8
Baseline to week 8
Change in STROOP incongruent score
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 8
Executive functioning
Baseline to Week 8
Change in STROOP congruent score
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 8
Speed of processing
Baseline to Week 8
Change in Perceived Deficits Questionnaire - Depression (PDQ-D) total score
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 8
Patient-reported cognitive function outcome including attention concentration, retrospective memory, prospective memory, and, planning organization
Baseline to Week 8
Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (depressive symptoms) (PHQ-9) total score
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 8
Patient-reported outcome
Baseline to Week 8
Change in Clinical Global Improvement - Severity (CGI-S)
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 8
Baseline to Week 8
Clinical Global Improvement (CGI-I)
Time Frame: Week 8
Week 8
Change in Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST)
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 8
Baseline to Week 8
Change in University of San Diego Performance-based Skills Assessment - Brief (UPSA-B) total score
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 8
Baseline to Week 8

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 21, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 21, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

October 23, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 28, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2017

Last Verified

February 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Major Depressive Disorder

Clinical Trials on Escitalopram 10-20 mg

3
Subscribe