Evaluation of 4D-contrast Enhanced PET-CT in Tumour Volume Definition

November 6, 2014 updated by: The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust

Evaluation of 4D-contrast Enhanced PET-CT in Tumour Volume Definition for Patients With Lung, Lower Oesophageal and Pancreatic Carcinomas.

The aim of high dose radiotherapy treatment is to deliver enough radiation to the tumour to kill all the cancer cells while at the same time giving a low dose of radiation to the normal parts of the body to reduce the side effects of treatment. This requires the cancer specialist to accurately identify the areas of cancer on a computed tomography (CT) scan. Positron emission tomography computed tomography (PETCT) scans use radioactive sugar that is injected into the patient. This sugar goes into cancer cells and shows up as a bright spot on the PET scan, allowing the doctors to see tumours more accurately. Some cancers move with breathing, for example lung, pancreas and oesophageal (or gullet) cancers. Fourdimensional CT scanning (4DCT) is a special type of CT scan that allows the motion of the tumour to be seen and measured accurately. This information can then be used to help ensure that the radiotherapy correctly treats the moving tumour.

The aim of this study is to see if there are possible benefits to combining PET with 4DCT to get a 4D PETCT scan for tumours that move with breathing. This study is divided into three cancer types; lung, lower oesophagus and pancreatic cancer.

First the investigators are going to test the use of 4D PETCT in the radiotherapy planning of these tumours to see if it helps the doctor to identify the cancer.

Secondly, the investigators are going to see if the 4D PETCT helps to show areas within the cancer that are potentially more active. This might then allow us to target a higher dose to these areas, which could potentially improve the chance of controlling and curing the cancer. Patients' standard treatment will not be altered by participating in the study.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 86 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18
  • WHO Performance status 02 (Appendix A)
  • Histologically proven non small cell lung carcinoma, distal oesophageal carcinoma or pancreatic adenocarcinoma
  • Clinical decision made to proceed with a course of radiotherapy of curative intent with or without concurrent chemotherapy
  • Measurable primary tumour and/or locoregional metastatic lymph nodes on preradiotherapy imaging
  • Able to provide fully informed written consent
  • Able to lie flat for 1 hour
  • Not be pregnant or breast feeding. Female patients of childbearing potential must agree to use effective contraception, be surgically sterile, or be postmenopausal.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Hypersensitivity to Fluorine18 fludeoxyglucose (FDG)
  2. Hypersensitivity to iodinated contrast media
  3. Poorly controlled diabetes
  4. Acute renal failure or moderate renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 30 mL/min)
  5. Claustrophobia precluding imaging
  6. Uncontrolled pain
  7. Urinary incontinence
  8. Female patients must not be pregnant and if of child bearing age using adequate contraception
  9. Breast feeding
  10. Serious psychiatric comorbidity

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Routine CT scan plus 4D PET-CT scan
Other: Routine CT scan

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Whole body 4D PET-CT for improved Target Definition/Delineation (feasibility and benefit) (ability to identify the cancer and ability to show areas within the cancer that are potentially more active allowing target of higher dose to these areas)
Time Frame: Up to two hours
To evaluate the feasibility and potential benefit of utilising 4D PET-CT for improved Target Definition/Delineation and to assess optimal segmentation of PET data
Up to two hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2014

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 21, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

November 7, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 7, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2014

Last Verified

November 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on No intervention

Subscribe