Pharmacogenetic Prediction of Metoprolol Effectiveness

August 18, 2021 updated by: University of Colorado, Denver
The investigators will prospectively follow a population of patients with uncontrolled high blood pressure beginning metoprolol succinate therapy to determine the drug effect in an observational clinical trial. The investigators will determine each individual's genotype for both CYP2D6 and Adrenoceptor Beta 1 (ADRB1). Metabolomic markers will be identified to determine if specific metabolites are associated with drug response. The investigators' overall objective is to determine if genetics predicts metoprolol succinate response better than clinical factors such as age, race, body mass index, dose, and medication co-ingestion.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

462

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • University of Colorado Denver; Emergency Department

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects between age >30 years and < 80 years
  2. Subjects have diagnosis of uncontrolled essential hypertension.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. end stage liver disease,
  2. end stage renal disease,
  3. pregnant females,
  4. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification of >3,
  5. wards of the state, prisoners,
  6. decisionally challenged,
  7. HR<60 bpm,
  8. AV block>240 msec,
  9. active reactive airway disease,
  10. illicit drug abuse in the preceding 30 days,
  11. hypersensitivity to metoprolol or its derivatives
  12. severe peripheral arterial circulatory disorders.

Subjects will have a screening physical exam performed by Dr. Monte prior to enrollment in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Metoprolol succinate, CYP2D6 Genotyping, CYP2D6 Phenotyping

The parent study will integrate covariates to predict metoprolol effectiveness for SBP decline of 10%. All patients will receive metoprolol. The following covariates will be used to predict metoprolol effectiveness: clinical variables (Age, sex, race/ethnicity, co-medications, and BMI) CYP2D6 genotype, CYP2D6 phenotype, and metabolomic factors.

metoprolol succinate

Genotyping: CYP2D6 only clinically pertinent pathway of metoprolol metabolism and polymorphisms have been associated with altered levels of metoprolol. ADRB1 is the drug target and polymorphism in this receptor has been associated with variable drug response. Genotyping will occur after the treatment phase is complete.

CYP2D6 Phenotyping: Phenotype can be discordant from what is predicted by genotype. CYP2D6 henotyping using dextromethorphan will be used. Investigators will be blind to the patient blood pressure outcome for this intervention.

Other Names:
  • Lopressor
CYP2D6 only clinically pertinent pathway of metoprolol metabolism and polymorphisms have been associated with altered levels of metoprolol. ADRB1 is the drug target and polymorphism in this receptor has been associated with variable drug response. Genotyping will occur after the treatment phase is complete. Thus the investigator, the subject, and the outcomes investigator will be blind to the intervention.
Other Names:
  • CYP2D6 genotyping and ADRB1 genotyping
Phenotype can be discordant from what is predicted by genotype due to variability in absorption, hepatic blood flow, drug interaction and drug elimination. These factors can be accounted for by utilizing a phenotyping assay that determines area under the curve of the probe since the probe is affected by the same variables dictating metabolism phenotype of the therapeutic drug. Investigators will be blind to the patient blood pressure outcome for this intervention.
Other Names:
  • Dextromethorphan probe of CYP2D6

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Blood Pressure Decline
Time Frame: 4-6 weeks status post initiation
Participants with at least a 10% decrease in SBP
4-6 weeks status post initiation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Heart Rate Decline
Time Frame: 4-6 weeks
10 % decline from pre-initiation heart rate will considered a HR decline success. Number of of participants with at least 10% decline is reported.
4-6 weeks
Adverse Drug Events: CYP2D6 Metabolizer Status
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Occurrence of adverse drug events will be captured and stratified by CYP2D6 metabolizer status (Poor Metabolizer (PM), Extensive Metabolizer (EM), Intermediate Metabolizer (IM), and Ultra rapid Metabolizer).
6 weeks
Adverse Drug Events: ADRB1 Genotype
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Occurrence of adverse drug events will be captured and stratified by ADRB1 genotype (strong responder, good responder, non-responder).
6 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Metabolomic Factors
Time Frame: 0-6 weeks
The top 5 metabolomic factors associated with SBP decline will be captured and stratified by CYP2D6 genotype and phenotype groups.
0-6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Andrew Monte, MD, University of Colorado, Denver

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2014

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

August 23, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

August 23, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 13, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 17, 2014

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 18, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 16, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 18, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypertension

Clinical Trials on metoprolol succinate

Subscribe