Cerebellar Mutism Syndrome Study

January 15, 2024 updated by: Aske Foldbjerg Laustsen, Rigshospitalet, Denmark

Nordic Study of the Cerebellar Mutism Syndrome in Children With Brain Tumours of the Posterior Fossa

The purpose of this study is to determine why up to 25% of the pediatric patients who have surgery for a tumor in the posterior fossa develops the Cerebellar Mutism Syndrome (CMS). Furthermore the purpose is to explore the clinical course and the best treatment of the syndrome.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Background:

Cancer accounts for 22 % of all deaths among children in Europe and is thus the leading non-traumatic pediatric cause of death. Central nervous system (CNS) tumours constitute 25% of all childhood cancers, and the majority of these are located in the posterior fossa. One of the most troublesome late effects after neurosurgery for such a tumour is the cerebellar mutism syndrome which is seen in up to 25% of the patients. It is characterized by mutism, hypotonia, ataxia and irritability. The exact aetiology, risk factors, clinical course and treatment have yet to be identified. The aim of this study is to accomplish that.

Method:

This is an observational prospective multicentre study that will include a minimum of 500 paediatric patients with posterior fossa CNS tumours from the Nordic countries. Additional countries might be added later once the study is running. The study has started in fall 2014 in 20 centres from 5 Nordic countries. Prior to this a pilot study was performed on 43 Danish adult patients to validate and fine-tune registration procedure. All patients will be treated according to local standards, but clinical data will be collected and imaging will be reviewed centrally.

To calculate the participation rate the annual number of included patients from each country will be compared to the number of registered patients in the cancer registers of the respective country and year.

A blood sample for genetic analysis will be collected from all patients. The patients' neurology and speech functions will be examined both pre-operatively and repeatedly post-operatively, including recording of standardised speech samples. All data will be collected trough a, for the purpose developed, online database.

Registration of data

The following data will be registered at the following 5 time points:

  1. Preoperatively Hospital and country, and patient related variables (date of birth, handedness, bilingualism, sex and date of diagnosis). Medical history (Previous neurological/neuropsychological/ psychiatric problems, comorbidities, previous operations or other treatment for the tumour, previous regular use of any kind of medication). Preoperative neurological status will be examined and a language and speech test will be performed and recorded. If the patient is younger than 2 years a bedside assessment of the speech will be performed instead of a test. A blood sample for genetic analysis will be drawn together with the standard blood samples. Alternatively this can be done at any time during follow-up.
  2. Postoperatively within 72 hours of surgery Operation related variables (date, duration and course of operation, surgical position, surgical approach, and tumour removal method), complications, technology employed, preoperative hydrocephalus and estimated completeness of tumour resection.
  3. Postoperatively within 1-4 weeks from surgery Approximately 1-2 weeks post-op: Postoperative language and speech status and for those older than 2 years, a recording of a speech sample. Neurological examination. Glucocorticoid administration pre-, intra- or postoperatively plus other medications used to treat the CMS postoperatively and their effects. Kind(s) of imaging performed on the tumour pre- and postoperatively. Approximately 4 weeks post-op: Development and treatment of postoperative intracranial haematoma and hydrocephalus, leakage of cerebrospinal fluid and need for ventilator.
  4. Postoperatively at about 2 months from surgery Postoperative development of CMS, detailed survey of the status of CMS in those affected including recording of speech sample and neurological examination. Medications used to treat the CMS since last registration and their effects.
  5. Postoperatively at about 12 months from surgery Language and neurological status including a speech sample for those older than 2 years. Medications used to treat the CMS since last registration and their effects. Other anti-cancer treatment given (chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy). Results from the pathology department regarding the kind of tumour histology and genetics. Registration of whether neuropsychological assessment(s) have been performed. Kind(s) of imaging performed on the tumour since 1st follow-up. Copies of the MRIs and descriptions performed pre-op, right after the operation and approximately. 12 months post-op are obtained.

All registered data will be examined by a third party who will check for missing data or misentries in order to ensure a high quality of the data. In case of missing data or misentries the third party will contact the person who made the registration.

The database is administered by the children's cancer epidemiology group (CCEG) at Karolinska Hospital in Stockholm, which is also responsible for the Swedish children's brain tumour registry and the leukaemia database for the Nordic Society of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology (NOPHO)

Other courses:

In case of acute surgery, coma etc. information about the study and the offer to participate can be given within 7 days from the operation. In these cases preoperative data about the patient can be obtained from the patient's medical record and/or from the parents, but a preoperative speech sample cannot be performed. These patients will not be included in the analysis of whether and how preoperative speech and language status affects the risk of developing CMS, but will be included in all the other study analyses. Speech samples will be performed postoperatively in exactly the same manner as in patients that were included before operation to able to monitor the patient's speech postoperatively and register signs of the CMS.

Should the patient have posterior fossa tumour surgery performed again during the 12 months follow-up period, the patient will re-start the follow-up programme from that date. A separate pre-op and all the post-op registrations will be performed again, and used in the analysis of risk of first versus second or further surgery. New genetic blood samples will not be necessary in these cases. Should the patient have posterior fossa tumour surgery performed after the last 12 months follow-up, the patient will be offered to participate in the study again and a new consent will have to be obtained. New genetic blood samples will not be necessary in these cases.

If the patient leaves the study for any reason before the follow-up 12 months post-op, a separate form will be filled out explaining why the patient left.

If the patient turns 18 while included in the study, a new consent to participate will have to be given by the patient him- /herself.

Blood samples and analyses:

As soon as a patient has been registered, the study centre will request a 2 ml anticoagulated blood sample for genetic profiling (Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) analysis).

The investigators will use a newly developed single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) sequencing strategy that allows cost-effective mapping of 25-30.000 genetic polymorphisms within biological domains that could potentially be linked to the development of CMS (e.g. inflammation, vascularization, blood-brain-barrier markers, and apolipoprotein E and other lipoprotein pathway genes). The genetic data will be linked to the clinical data to identify genetic variants associated with the risk of CMS or the course of CMS. Specifically the investigators will map all SNPs in all genes that are known or are likely to be linked to these pathways, including mRNA binding sites and first order protein-protein interactions. Rather than expecting large effects of single SNPs, the strategy of this approach is to use front-line bioinformatics and pathway analyses to explore the additive effect of numerous SNPs involved in the same biological pathway. This will identify high-impact pathways, although with individual low-impact SNPs. The results obtained could guide future therapeutic approaches to CMS.

If the custodial parents do not consent to their child contributing a blood sample to the study, the child may still participate in the study, albeit not in the part involving genetic analysis. The samples as well as the rest of the study data will be protected under the Act on Processing of Personal Data and the Act on the Health Act.

All MRIs are analyzed by neuroradiologists with respect to tumour resection and neuroradiographic signs associated with CMS.

All speech recording are analyzed by speech therapists with respect to signs associated with CMS. The results of neuropsychological tests that may have been performed routinely will be separately obtained and analyzed.

Power calculations:

For the surgical hypothesis, assuming that 35% of patients are operated with an approach that has a lower risk of CMS (assumed to be 10%) and the remaining 65% of patients are operated using other approaches that carries a 20% risk of CMS, the investigators will with 80% power be able to identify a difference at a 5% significance level if the investigators include a total of 450 patients.

For the genetic analysis, several pathways and SNP-profiles will be explored with appropriate adjustments for multiple comparisons. Multiple SNPs will due to randomness be found to be related with the risk of CMS. Their true biological significance will subsequently be validated through internal validation, as the investigators will explore if other SNPs in the same biological pathway, e.g. SNPs in the same genes but not the same haplotype or SNPs that affect coding or regulatory regions in the identified risk-related genes are more significantly associated with risk of CMS than randomly selected SNPs. Furthermore, the genes/SNPs will be explored by bioinformatic predictions of the impact of the SNPs on protein-folding, binding affinity etc. Once such high-risk SNPs/genes/pathways have been identified and published, the investigators will attempt to have them confirmed in independent patient cohorts from Europe or the US. Based on a projected overall risk of CMS of 20%, a frequency of a specific SNP (or SNP-profile) of 30%, and a projected doubled risk of CMS in the group that harbour the SNP (or SNP-profile), the investigators will with 90% power be able to identify such a genetic predisposition at a 5% significance level, if a total of 343 patients are included in the study. Thus, the study has sufficient power.

To analyze the effect of the above mentioned variables (surgical method, administration of corticosteroid, handedness etc.) on the risk of developing CMS the investigators will perform univariate and multivariate regression analyses as well as standard descriptive analyses. These analyses will be performed using R.

Discussion:

The study will be the largest prospective multicenter study on cerebellar mutism syndrome to date, and the first one of its kind to systematically gather detailed information about 1) the surgical approaches least likely to cause the syndrome, 2) how the syndrome is best treated, 3) the role of genetics and 4) differences in incidence and clinical course of the syndrome for different patients.

The ultimate aim of the study is to reduce the incidence and improve the treatment of cerebellar mutism syndrome and lead to harmonization of the treatment of CNS tumour patients across the Nordic countries.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

1000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All children (0-18 years) with a tumour in the posterior fossa (cerebellum/4th ventricle/brainstem ) requiring surgery or open biopsy at one of the participating centres.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age < 18 years at the date of first imaging showing this tumour
  • Tumour in the cerebellum/4th ventricle/brainstem with intention to treat with surgical resection or open biopsy. Second and further surgeries are also included.
  • Informed consent from custodial parent(s)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Posterior fossa tumor patients
Children (0-18 years) with a tumour in the posterior fossa (cerebellum/4th ventricle/brainstem ) requiring surgery or open biopsy at one of the participating centres.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Development and progress of Cerebellar Mutism Syndrome
Time Frame: 1 year after surgery
The development of CMS is determined by a survey developed Robertson et al. The correlation between the risk of developing CMS and different neurosurgical techniques, genomic variants, treatments, tumor types, comorbidities, neuroradiologic findings, handedness and preoperative language status will be explored.
1 year after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Development and progress of reduced speech output
Time Frame: 1 year after surgery
Speech production that is severely reduced and limited to single words or short sentences which can only be elicited after vigorous stimulation
1 year after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Rigshospitalet, Denmark

Collaborators

Odense University Hospital
Karolinska University Hospital
Turku University Hospital
Radboud University Medical Center
Medical University of Vienna
Oslo University Hospital
Helsinki University Central Hospital
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Aarhus University Hospital
Oulu University Hospital
Kuopio University Hospital
University Hospital of North Norway
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden
Haukeland University Hospital
University Hospital, Ghent
Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Queen Fabiola Children's University Hospital
University Hospital, Antwerp
University Hospital Tuebingen
University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust
University Hospital, Linkoeping
Aalborg University Hospital
Motol University Hospital
Tampere University Hospital
South Glasgow University Hospitals NHS Trust
Skane University Hospital
University Hospital, Umeå
Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust
Uppsala University Hospital
Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh
University Hospital Birmingham
Technical University of Denmark
Trondheim University Hospital
Ospedale Pediatrico Bambin Gesù
CHC MontLégia
Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc
University of Leipzig Medical Center
Hospital De La Citadelle

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Kjeld Schmiegelow, MD, Dr. med, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
  • Study Chair: Karsten Nysom, MD, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
  • Principal Investigator: Marianne Juhler, MD, Dr. med, Rigshospitalet, Denmark

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 21, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 24, 2014

First Posted (Estimated)

November 25, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 18, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 15, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • H-6-2014-002

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Infratentorial Neoplasms

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Rwanda

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe