- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02318472
Early Mobilization After Achilles Tendon Rupture (EarlyM-Achil)
Effects of Direct Functional Mobilization After Achilles Tendon Rupture on Healing and Outcome
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Patients with acute Achilles tendon rupture will be screened for eligibility at the Karolinska University Hospital and Södersjukhuset, Stockholm.
One hundred-fifty patients will be included and enrolled and assigned to the interventions either by a third party nurse or by a research nurse. Randomisation will be performed with use of computer-generated random numbers in permuted blocks of four, through an independent software specialist, and consecutively numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes opened after surgery and prior to treatment.
The patients will be randomized to undergo either treatment as usual using plaster cast treatment alone or direct post-operative functional mobilization with a weight-bearing orthosis with adjustable range of motion of the ankle.
The power calculation was based upon data from a recent study reporting a 50% rate of CDU-verified DVT after ATR surgery (Domeij-Arverud et a. 2015). We estimated early functional mobilization (EFM) to confer a 50% risk reduction. Sixty-three patients in each group were required to detect a difference of 25% in the incidence of DVT (two-sided type-I error rate = 5%; power = 80%). We decided to include 150 patients to counteract drop-outs. On recommendations from the ethical committee, a ratio of 2:1 was chosen, since our hypothesis was that the EFM group would perform better.
The endpoint of the first part of the study is tendon healing quantified at 2 weeks by microdialysis followed by quantification of markers for tendon repair. The sample size for the outcome in the microdialysis study was calculated on a difference of the glutamate metabolite of 12 µM between the two groups. For this power analysis, we used a glutamate standard difference of 15 µM resulting from a previous study. It was determined that a sample size of 25 patients per group would be necessary to detect the glutamate difference with 80% power when alpha was set equal to 5%. Anticipating that we would lose 10% of participants enrolled, we plan to enroll 27 patients in each group for microdialysis.
The primary aim of the short-term follow up of this randomized, controlled trial was to assess the efficacy of EFM to reduce the DVT incidence after ATR surgery, at two and six weeks post-operatively, compared to treatment-as-usual, i.e. two weeks of plaster cast followed by four weeks' orthosis immobilization. The secondary aim was to evaluate the effect of patient intrinsic factors (age, BMI, calf circumference, ankle range of motion, pain and fear of movement) and patient extrinsic factors (amount of weightbearing, number of daily steps) on the risk of sustaining a DVT.
The primary aim with the long-term follow up is to investigate the effect of early postoperative functional mobilization compared to immobilization on patient-reported function, health, fear of movement, physical activity level, and differences in functional capacity. The second aim is to explore if the occurrence of DVT postoperatively effects functional outcome in the long-term after surgical treatment of ATR.
Additional aims:
The primary aim of the second part of this study was to assess the number of steps and the amount of loading in a weight bearing orthosis during the first six weeks post-surgical ATR repair. A secondary purpose was to investigate if the amount of loading was correlated to fear of movement or/and pain.
The aim with this substudy is to describe differences between the two groups over time regarding tendon elongation, differences in muscle cross-sectional area and differences in tendon cross-sectional area (on the injured side) and to examine if the differences can predict functional outcome in the long-term and if any of the follow-up occasions are most important for long-term functional outcome.
Few studies have evaluated outcome more than one year after injury. The aim of this substudy is to investigate differences in outcome at 3 years after injury between the patients that sustained a DVT and those who did not sustain a DVT. Another aim is to compare the two intervention groups over 3-years time.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Stockholm, Sweden, 17176
- Karolinska University Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Acute unilateral ATR, operated on within 96 hours
- Age between 18 and 75 years
Exclusion Criteria:
- Inability to give informed consent
- Current anticoagulation treatment (including high dose acetylsalicylic acid)
- Planned follow-up at other hospital
- Inability to follow instructions
- Known kidney failure
- Heart failure with pitting oedema
- Thrombophlebitis
- Thromboembolic event during the previous three months
- Other surgery during the previous month
- Known malignancy
- Haemophilia; and pregnancy
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Early mobilization
Functional mobilization initiated directly post-operative with a weight-bearing VACOped orthosis with adjustable range of motion of the ankle
|
Weight-bearing orthosis with adjustable range of motion of the ankle
|
|
Active Comparator: Immobilization
Treatment as usual using plaster cast immobilization
|
Lower limb plaster cast
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Deep venous thrombosis (DVT)
Time Frame: Six weeks
|
At 2 and 6 weeks postoperatively the number of participants with DVT will be assessed by compression duplex ultrasound (CDU)
|
Six weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Functional outcome - muscular endurance tests (heel-rise)
Time Frame: Four years
|
The functional outcome will be assessed at 26 and 52 weeks and 3-4 years postoperatively by validated muscular endurance test, i.e. heel rise test.
|
Four years
|
|
Patient-reported outcome - ATRS
Time Frame: Four years
|
The patients' symptoms will be assessed using the reliable and valid score; the Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS).
6, 12 months and 3-4 years postoperatively
|
Four years
|
|
Patient-reported outcome - EQ-5D
Time Frame: One year
|
The patients' symptoms will be assessed using the reliable and valid score; EuroQol Group's questionnaire (EQ-5D).
|
One year
|
|
Physical activity - PAS
Time Frame: Four years
|
The patients' physical activity levels will be assessed a valid score; the Physical Activity scale (PAS).
6, 12 months and 3-4 years postoperatively
|
Four years
|
|
Patient-reported outcome - The Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS)
Time Frame: One year
|
The patients' symptoms will be assessed using the reliable and valid score; The Foot and Ankle Outcome Score.
FAOS consists of 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Functioning sport and recreation (Sport(Rec), and foot and ankle-related Quality of Life (QOL).
Each question gets a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.
Assessed 6 and 12 months postoperatively
|
One year
|
|
Patient-reported outcome - RAND 36 Health and Quality of Life questionnaire
Time Frame: One year
|
The patients' symptoms will be assessed using the reliable and valid score; The RAND-36 Health and Quality of Life.
The questionnaire is composed of 36 items, scored from 1 to 2,3, 5 or 6, some items are scored reversed.
The score is divided in 8 subscales (dimensions) as the SF-36 questionnarie.
The software recodes the points to a scale of 0 (worst) to 100 (best) for each subscale.
Assessed at 6 and 12 months postoperatively
|
One year
|
|
Patient-reported outcome - Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, Swedish version, TSK-SV
Time Frame: One year
|
The patients' symptoms will be assessed using the reliable and valid score; The Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-SV.
The scale comprises of 17 items and a total score is computed.
4 items are inverted and rescaled Before summation.
Each item are scored from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree).
The total sum is between 17 to 68, where a score of more than 37 is defined as kinesiophobia.
Assessed at 2 and 6 weeks and 6 and 12 months postoperatively
|
One year
|
|
Plantar force loading
Time Frame: Six weeks
|
Measured with mobile force sensors, insoles at 2 and 6 weeks postoperatively
|
Six weeks
|
|
Patient-reported diary - self-reported loading
Time Frame: Two weeks
|
Estimation on daily self-reported loading on a VAS-scale, scored from 0 (non-weightbearing) to 100 (full weightbearing).
Performed at home during the first 2 weeks postoperatively.
The VAS scale is converted to percent (%) for analysis.
|
Two weeks
|
|
Patient-reported diary - pain ratings
Time Frame: Two weeks
|
Pain ratings on a VAS-scale at home during the first week postoperatively.
The patients are rating their pain from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst imaginable pain) during activity and at rest.
|
Two weeks
|
|
Patient-reported diary - steps/day
Time Frame: Two weeks
|
Measurement of number of steps taken each day with a valid pedometer at home during the first 2 weeks postoperatively
|
Two weeks
|
|
Calf circumference
Time Frame: Four years
|
Measured with a tape measure at the thickest part of the calf in sitting position at 2 and 6 weeks and 6, 12 months and 3-4 years postoperatively
|
Four years
|
|
Ankle dorsiflexion
Time Frame: Six weeks
|
Ankle range of motion in dorsiflexion, measured in sitting position with goniometer at 2 and 6 weeks postoperatively
|
Six weeks
|
|
Tendon length measurement
Time Frame: Four years
|
Ultrasound measurement on Achilles tendon length, measured in centimeters, from the calcaneal bone to the gastrocnemius and the soleus muscles, with extended field-of-view images.
Images taken at 2 and 6 weeks and 6 and 12 months and 3-4 years postoperatively
|
Four years
|
|
Tendon thickness measurement
Time Frame: One year
|
Ultrasound measurement on Achilles tendon circumference (thickness), measured in cm2, with B-mode images.
Images taken at 2 and 6 weeks and 6 and 12 months postoperatively
|
One year
|
|
Muscle volume of the calf muscles
Time Frame: One year
|
Ultrasound measurement on muscle volume of the calf muscles (gastrocnemius), measured in cm2, with extended field-of-view images.
Images taken at 2 and 6 weeks and 6 and 12 months postoperatively
|
One year
|
|
Thickness of the calf muscles
Time Frame: One year
|
Ultrasound measurement on thickness of the calf muscle (soleus).
Measured in centimeter, with B-mode images.
Images taken at 2 and 6 weeks and 6 and 12 months postoperatively
|
One year
|
|
Achilles Tendon resting angle (ATRA)
Time Frame: Four years
|
A clinical measurement of indirect Tendon length with patient prone lying, measured with goniometer with arms parallell to fibula and MTP5, measured at 2 and 6 weeks and 6 and 12 months and 3-4 years postoperatively
|
Four years
|
|
3D gait analysis
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Three-dimensional gait analysis, performed at 8 weeks and 6 months postoperatively, measurement of the quality of gait
|
6 months
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Tendon healing using microdialysis
Time Frame: Two weeks
|
Microdialysis will be followed by quantification of markers for tendon repair
|
Two weeks
|
|
Time to surgery
Time Frame: Within 10 days
|
Prognostic factor: Time to surgery , i.e. the time from ATR injury to start of the surgical procedure, will be calculated by using the time-point at which the patient sustained the injury as described in the patient journal, as well as the starting time point of the surgery as registered in the computerized operation report. |
Within 10 days
|
|
Surgeon sex
Time Frame: Surgery is performed within 10 days after injury
|
Prognostic factor: All patients are operated on according to a standardized surgical protocol.
and the surgeon on duty will perform the surgical repair and no specific surgeon can be selected by the patients.
Unknown sex of the operating surgeon will be included as an additional exclusion criterion in the study.
|
Surgery is performed within 10 days after injury
|
|
Surgeon experience
Time Frame: Surgery is performed within 10 days after injury
|
Prognostic factor: All patients are operated on according to a standardized surgical protocol.
and the surgeon on duty will perform the surgical repair and no specific surgeon can be selected by the patients.
The experienced group of surgeons will consist of specialists accredited with a specialist licence issued by The Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare.
The less experienced group of surgeons will consist of residents.
|
Surgery is performed within 10 days after injury
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Paul W Ackermann, MD, PhD, Karolinska University Hospital
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Aufwerber S, Silbernagel KG, Ackermann PW, Naili JE. Comparable Recovery and Compensatory Strategies in Heel-Rise Performance After a Surgically Repaired Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture: An In Vivo Kinematic Analysis Comparing Early Functional Mobilization and Standard Treatment. Am J Sports Med. 2022 Dec;50(14):3856-3865. doi: 10.1177/03635465221129284. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
- Chen J, Wang J, Hart DA, Ahmed AS, Ackermann PW. Complement factor D as a predictor of Achilles tendon healing and long-term patient outcomes. FASEB J. 2022 Jun;36(6):e22365. doi: 10.1096/fj.202200200RR.
- Aufwerber S, Edman G, Gravare Silbernagel K, Ackermann PW. Changes in Tendon Elongation and Muscle Atrophy Over Time After Achilles Tendon Rupture Repair: A Prospective Cohort Study on the Effects of Early Functional Mobilization. Am J Sports Med. 2020 Nov;48(13):3296-3305. doi: 10.1177/0363546520956677. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
- Aufwerber S, Heijne A, Edman G, Silbernagel KG, Ackermann PW. Does Early Functional Mobilization Affect Long-Term Outcomes After an Achilles Tendon Rupture? A Randomized Clinical Trial. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Mar 16;8(3):2325967120906522. doi: 10.1177/2325967120906522. eCollection 2020 Mar.
- Aufwerber S, Heijne A, Gravare Silbernagel K, Ackermann PW. High Plantar Force Loading After Achilles Tendon Rupture Repair With Early Functional Mobilization. Am J Sports Med. 2019 Mar;47(4):894-900. doi: 10.1177/0363546518824326. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
- Alim MA, Svedman S, Edman G, Ackermann PW. Procollagen markers in microdialysate can predict patient outcome after Achilles tendon rupture. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2016 Jun 10;2(1):e000114. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2016-000114. eCollection 2016.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- VR2012-2510
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Deep Venous Thrombosis
-
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto AlegreCompletedDeep Venous Thromboses | Deep Venous Thrombosis of Left Leg | Deep Venous Thrombosis of Right Leg | Deep Venous Thrombosis Proximal
-
Intermountain Health Care, Inc.TerminatedDeep Vein Thrombosis | Venous Thromboembolism | Deep Venous Thrombosis | Thrombus | Upper Extremity Deep Venous ThrombosisUnited States
-
Tong ZhuNot yet recruitingDeep Vein Thrombosis | Deep Venous Insufficiency
-
Maastricht University Medical CenterTerminatedRandomized Clinical Trial | Deep-Venous Thrombosis | Deep Venous StentingNetherlands
-
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterRecruitingVenous Thromboembolism | Deep Venous ThrombosisUnited States, Australia
-
Al-Nahrain UniversityNot yet recruitingDVT - Deep Vein Thrombosis | VTE (Venous Thromboembolism)Iraq
-
Imperial College LondonWithdrawnDeep Vein Thrombosis | Deep Venous Thrombosis of LegUnited Kingdom
-
University of Massachusetts, AmherstCompletedDeep Venous Thrombosis of Deep Femoral VeinUnited States
-
Milton S. Hershey Medical CenterEnrolling by invitation
-
Ottawa Hospital Research InstituteUniversity of Alberta; Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation; Queen Elizabeth...CompletedThromboprophylaxis With Rivaroxaban In Patients With Malignancy and Central Venous Lines (TRIM-Line)Cancer | Central Venous Catheter Thrombosis | Upper Extremity Deep Vein ThrombosisCanada
Clinical Trials on VACOped orthosis
-
Karolinska University HospitalRecruitingVenous Stasis | Deep Venous ThrombosisSweden
-
Institute for Biomechanics, ETH ZürichCompletedRehabilitation After Ankle InjuriesSwitzerland
-
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmcRecruitingTraumatic Fracture | Spine Fracture | Orthosis | Posterior FixationNetherlands
-
Erasmus Medical CenterReinier Haga Orthopedisch Centrum; ZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for... and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
University of MalagaCompletedHand OsteoarthritisSpain
-
Istanbul Medipol University HospitalCompleted
-
Dr. Christopher BaileyCompletedMyelopathy Cervical | Radiculopathy, Cervical | Spinal Stenosis Cervical | Posterior Cervical Spinal Surgery | Spondylosis, CervicalCanada
-
Western University, CanadaNot yet recruitingSplints | Thumb Osteoarthritis | CMC
-
St. Louis UniversityTerminatedCompression Fracture of Thoracic Vertebral Body | Thoracic Fracture | Lumbar Fracture | Compression Fracture of Lumbar Spine | Burst Fracture of Thoracic Vertebra | Burst Fracture of Lumbar VertebraUnited States
-
University of DelawareCompleted