Randomized Controlled Trial of Interpersonal Psychotherapy for Depression and PTSD Among HIV+ Women in Kenya

April 29, 2019 updated by: University of California, San Francisco

Randomized Controlled Trial of Interpersonal Psychotherapy for Depression and PTSD Among HIV-infected Women Exposed to Gender Based Violence in Kenya

The aim of this study is to conduct a 12-week IPT+TAU versus wait list TAU in a cohort of HIV+GBV+ women in Nyanza Province to relieve depression and PTSD and improve ARV adherence. This pilot study will provide data on the efficacy trends, acceptability and feasibility of our IPT intervention and will generate preliminary findings for an R01-funded intervention to test the intervention's efficacy for remediating the effects of GBV trauma on mental health and HIV-related outcomes.

Hypothesis 1: IPT+ TAU will be more effective for reduction of depression and PTSD than TAU alone.

Hypothesis 2: IPT+TAU will be acceptable and feasible.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

We will use a parallel design with FACES Treatment as Usual (TAU) control to provide IPT once per week for twelve weeks to HIV+GBV+ women meeting CIDI diagnostic criteria for depression (MDD, dysthymia, minor depression) and PTSD secondary to GBV. Blocked randomization will be used to evenly distribute 120 participants to (1) IPT + TAU or (2) TAU for 12 weeks. The TAU group will be offered IPT treatment following the initial 12 week trial. Thus, all study subjects will receive TAU throughout the study and they will all receive IPT in either the first or second half of the study. My research team at FACES will be recruited for IPT training as potential therapists in the IPT pilot. A run-in study design will be used, assigning one training case apiece to each of the 8 therapists to practice IPT skills. Both IPT + TAU and TAU groups will be measured at baseline and weeks 12, 24 and 36 by blinded assessment. At FACES, TAU resources for HIV+GBV+ women include medical professionals, counseling, community elders, church leaders, police, and a pro-bono legal aid, all of who have all been involved with past FACES GBV interventions.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

300

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Nyanza
      • Kisumu, Nyanza, Kenya
        • Family AIDS Care Education and Services

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • .(1) HIV+ women enrolled at FACES-Kisumu; (2) Diagnosis with depression (MDD, dysthymia, minor depression) and PTSD secondary to GBV* on the CIDI; (3) Ability to attend weekly therapy sessions and repeated measures; (4) Age greater than 18 years; (5) Ability to give informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • (1) Cognitive dysfunction requiring a higher level of care or compromising ability to participate in IPT**; (2) severe thought or mood disorder symptoms requiring a higher level of care or interfering with ability to participate in IPT; (3) current drug and alcohol dependence requiring substance use treatment. Although PTSD is associated with substance abuse in EuroAmerican populations, a recent study of 5175 FACES patients found that over 80% of this LMIC population use no alcohol.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: treatment as usual
Usual Clinic psychosocial treatment
Clinic psychosocial treatment as usual
Experimental: interpersonal psychotherapy
Interpersonal Psychotherapy is an evidence-based structured, brief psychotherapy which focuses on improving relationships in order to improve mood and reduce anxiety.
Interpersonal psychotherapy is an evidence based, structured, brief psychotherapy which improves relationships in order to improve mood and reduce anxiety

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Depression, PTSD
Time Frame: Change from 0-12 weeks, 12-24 weeks and 24-36 weeks
structured clinical interview: Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI)
Change from 0-12 weeks, 12-24 weeks and 24-36 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ARV adherence
Time Frame: Change from 0-12 weeks, 12-24 weeks and 24-36 weeks
Visual Analog Scale self-report
Change from 0-12 weeks, 12-24 weeks and 24-36 weeks
HIV viral load
Time Frame: 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks
blood draw
12 weeks, 24 weeks, 36 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
cost analyses
Time Frame: Cost: 12 weeks; benefits (DALYS and productivity): Change from 0-12 weeks, 12-24 weeks and 24-36 weeks
Cost: 12 weeks; benefits (DALYS and productivity): Change from 0-12 weeks, 12-24 weeks and 24-36 weeks
Neurocognitive outcomes
Time Frame: Change from 0-12 weeks, 12-24 weeks and 24-36 weeks
Change from 0-12 weeks, 12-24 weeks and 24-36 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 9, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 15, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

December 19, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 1, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 29, 2019

Last Verified

April 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on treatment as usual

Subscribe