Urotherapy vs. Urotherapy With Constipation Treatment for Children With Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction

April 9, 2018 updated by: Noam Zevit, Rabin Medical Center

A Controlled Randomized, Physician Blinded Study to Assess Isolated Uro-therapy vs. Urotherapy With Constipation Treatment for Patients With Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction (LUTD) Not Meeting ROME-III Constipation Criteria

Constipation treatment has been found to ameliorate symptoms in some patients with lower urinary tract dysfunction (including day time or combined day time/night time urinary incontinence). This study aims to explore if treatment of patients without overt constipation (As defined by the ROME III criteria) will also respond to anti-constipation treatment with reduction of their urinary tract symptoms. Assessment of severity and response of lower urinary tract dysfunction will be based on the Vancouver NULTD/DES questionnaire.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Petach Tikva, Israel, 49202
        • Institute of Gastroenterology, Nutrition, and Liver Diseases; Schneider Children's Medical Center of Israel

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

5 years to 17 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Aged 5-17 years at time of signing of informed consent.
  2. Lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD)-daytime/daytime and nighttime urinary incontinence as defined by a score of >11 on the Vancouver Questionnaire .
  3. Do not meet Rome III criteria for functional constipation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Inability to provide signed informed consent.
  2. Inability to comply with the study protocol.
  3. Neurogenic bladder
  4. Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD or ADHD) on medical treatment.
  5. Known significant sacral, perineal, or other congenital or surgical defect.
  6. Known orthopedic/neurological disease which may affect urinary continence, cause constipation, or affect reading of abdominal x-rays. (e.g. spastic cerebral palsy, severe scoliosis)
  7. Patient taking medicinal drugs which can cause urinary incontinence or constipation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Urotherapy + Constipation Treatment
This group will be treated with standard behavioral urotherapy in addition to receiving active stool softening with PEG3350 and standard constipation instruction.
Patients will initially receive three days of high dose PEG3350 treatment (1.5gr/kg up to 100gr maximum) and the stepped down to 0.8gr/kg subsequently tapered according to stool consistency and frequency.
Other Names:
  • PEG3350
  • Normalax
Patients in the active group will receive dietary instruction as to fiber content, as well as behavior therapy including active sitting on the toilet to attempt defacation following meals.
The children will be guided for appropriate drinking and toilet habits, and will start with timed voiding.
Other: Urotherapy alone
This group will receive standard behavioral urotherapy alone.
The children will be guided for appropriate drinking and toilet habits, and will start with timed voiding.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Complete (Vancouver score - ≤90% of screening value) or Partial (Vancouver score ≤ 50% screening value) response at the end of intervention.
Time Frame: 14 weeks
14 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants with complete (Vancouver score - ≤90% of screening value) or Partial (Vancouver score ≤ 50% screening value) response in patient subgroups with fecal loading compared to those without fecal loading.
Time Frame: 14 weeks
Number of participants with complete (Vancouver score - ≤90% of screening value) or Partial (Vancouver score ≤ 50% screening value) response to therapy in those with radiological evidence of fecal loading on enrollment abdominal x-ray (as defined by rectal/pelvic outlet ratio, Leech score, and Barr score) compared to those who did not in the intervention group and the urotherapy group
14 weeks
Sustained Response - Number of participants with complete (Vancouver score - ≤90% of screening value) or Partial (Vancouver score ≤ 50% screening value) response 12 weeks after intervention has ended.
Time Frame: 26 weeks
26 weeks
Number of participants with adverse effects
Time Frame: 14 weeks
Adverse effects of interventions as reported by patients/care givers during visits
14 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

January 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 1, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 8, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

January 13, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 11, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 9, 2018

Last Verified

April 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diurnal Enuresis

Clinical Trials on polyethylene glycol 3350

3
Subscribe