Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy in Chronic Stroke Patients

December 18, 2017 updated by: University Hospital of Ferrara

The Feasibility of a Home-based Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Program in Chronic Stroke Survivors.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of a Home-based Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (hCIMT) compared to a Modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (mCIMT) delivered in a outpatient setting on upper limb motor recovery in stroke survivors.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Home-based Constraint Induced Modified Therapy (hCIMT) consist of 2 hours intensive upper limb practice with shaping techniques + 2 hours ADLs supervised by a caregiver. Patients are supposed to wear a mitt on the unaffected hand for 4 hours daily.

Modified Constraint Induced Modified Therapy (mCIMT) consist of 2 hours intensive upper limb practice with shaping techniques supervised by an experienced physiotherapist + 2 hours ADLs at home (supervised by a caregiver) Patients are supposed to wear a mitt on the unaffected hand for 4 hours daily.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ferrara, Italy, 44124
        • Ferrara University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age > 18 years and < 80 years
  • diagnosis of first ischemic stroke
  • stroke onset > 6 months prior to study enrollment
  • upper extremity hemiparesis with impairment of hand and/or arm:
  • active wrist extension ≥20º
  • active metacarpophalangeal- and interphalangeal-joints extension ≥ 10°
  • muscle tone assessed by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) ≤ 2
  • pain assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) <4

Exclusion Criteria:

  • anyone who does not have adequate understanding of verbal or written information in Italian sufficient to complete any test
  • impaired cognitive functioning: score less than 24 on the Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE)
  • contraindications to single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)(TMS will be used to measure cortical excitability): presence of a history of epilepsy, frequent headaches or neck pain, implantable devices (ventriculoperitoneal shunts, pacemakers, intrathecal pumps, intracranial metal implants)
  • neurological or psychiatric pathology
  • severe cardio-pulmonary, renal, hepatic diseases
  • pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: mCIMT
2 hours intensive upper limb practice with shaping techniques supervised by an experienced physiotherapist + 2 hours ADLs at home (supervised by a caregiver) Patients are supposed to wear a mitt on the unaffected hand for 4 hours daily.

This intervention is based on 3 main aspects:

  1. intensive training of functional tasks with the affected arm (massed practice)
  2. constraint of the un-affected hand through a mitt
  3. shaping techniques designed to transfer gains to the real world activities

The 2 hours massed practice will be performed in a outpatient clinic with a supervision of PT.

Experimental: hCIMT

2 hours intensive upper limb practice with shaping techniques + 2 hours ADLs supervised by a caregiver.

Patients are supposed to wear a mitt on the unaffected hand for 4 hours daily.

This intervention is based on 3 main aspects:

  1. intensive training of functional tasks with the affected arm (massed practice)
  2. constraint of the un-affected hand through a mitt
  3. shaping techniques designed to transfer gains to the real world activities

In this group, a comprehensive set of the material necessary to perform the training at home and a booklet containing an explanation of the exercises that can be done will be provided to subjects.

In addition, 2 hospital visits will be scheduled to instruct subjects and caregivers on the training and to update activities (1 visit at the beginning + 1 visit after 1 week).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes from baseline in Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity (FM-UE)
Time Frame: 1)A week prior to treatment beginning 2) the week after the end of treatment 4) at 3 months follow-up
Measure of upper extremity motor impairment. The upper extremity score ranges from 0-66.
1)A week prior to treatment beginning 2) the week after the end of treatment 4) at 3 months follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT)
Time Frame: 1)A week prior to treatment beginning 2) the week after the end of treatment 4) at 3 months follow-up
Quantitative measure of upper extremity motor ability through timed and functional tasks.
1)A week prior to treatment beginning 2) the week after the end of treatment 4) at 3 months follow-up
Nine Hole Peg Test (NHPT
Time Frame: 1)A week prior to treatment beginning 2) the week after the end of treatment 4) at 3 months follow-up
Measures finger dexterity
1)A week prior to treatment beginning 2) the week after the end of treatment 4) at 3 months follow-up
Motor Activity Log (MAL)
Time Frame: 1)A week prior to treatment beginning 2) the week after the end of treatment 4) at 3 months follow-up
Assessment of the change in real-world arm use in activities of daily living. Subjects are asked to score the quality of movement as well as amount of use of the affected arm in a number of common daily activities.
1)A week prior to treatment beginning 2) the week after the end of treatment 4) at 3 months follow-up
Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 (SIS 3.0)
Time Frame: 1)A week prior to treatment beginning 2) the week after the end of treatment 4) at 3 months follow-up
Self-assessment questionnaire assesses health status following stroke
1)A week prior to treatment beginning 2) the week after the end of treatment 4) at 3 months follow-up
Motor cortex excitability (single pulse and paired pulse TMS)
Time Frame: 1)A week prior to treatment beginning 2) the week after the end of treatment 4) at 3 months follow-up

Single-Pulse TMS will be used to study cortical-spinal tract excitability in primary motor cortex (M1).

Paired-pulse TMS Paired-Pulse TMS will be used to study intracortical excitability.

1)A week prior to treatment beginning 2) the week after the end of treatment 4) at 3 months follow-up
NIRS (Near Infrared Spectroscopy) NIRS measurements will be performed during 6 cycles of 15s hand reaching and grasping and 45s resting while sitting on a chair.
Time Frame: 1)A week prior to treatment beginning 2) the week after the end of treatment 4) at 3 months follow-up

For the NIRS it will use an 32-channel NIRS imaging equipment which consist of 16 pairs of emitting and detecting optical fibers attached to a custom-made head cap placed on primary motor cortex.

NIRS measurements will be performed during 6 cycles of 15s hand reaching and grasping and 45s resting while sitting on a chair.

1)A week prior to treatment beginning 2) the week after the end of treatment 4) at 3 months follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sofia Straudi, MD, Ospedale San Giorgio

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 19, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

January 26, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 20, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 18, 2017

Last Verified

December 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on mCIMT

Subscribe