Effects of Tremella Fuciformis on Improvement in Cognitive-Bio-Markers of Cognitive Functions

June 30, 2015 updated by: In Kyoon Lyoo, Ewha Womans University

Effects of Tremella Fuciformis on Improvement in Cognitive-Bio-Markers of Cognitive Functions in Healthy Adults With Subjective Cognitive Impairment: An 8-Week Prospective Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial With Multimodal Neuroimaging and Neurocognitive Assessments

The objective of this study is to demonstrate the cognitive enhancement effect and safety of Tremella Fuciformis, using the cognitive and clinical indicators (e.g. memory, attention, and psychomotor speed) and the latest brain imaging methods for healthy adults suffering subjective cognitive impairment.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

75

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 40 and 65 years old
  • Global Deterioration Scale score (GDS) of 2
  • High school or higher levels of education.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current pregnancy or breast-feeding
  • Evidence of neurologic or medical conditions
  • Axis I diagnosis when assessed by the board certified psychiatrist using the Structured Clinical Interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder, 4th edition (DSM-IV)(SCID-IV)
  • Mini-mental status examination score of 24 or less
  • Clinical Dementia Rating score of 0.5 or more suggesting cognitive impairment beyond self-perceived subjective deficits
  • Intelligence quotient less than 70
  • Contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
  • Use of psychotropics in last 3 months
  • Use of oral contraceptive medication
  • Participation in other clinical trials during the study period that might affect the outcome of the present study
  • Allergic adverse reactions to mushrooms

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: placebo
Experimental: TF 600mg
TF 600mg/day
Experimental: TF 1200mg
TF 1200mg/day

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes from baseline in neurocognitive function (neurocognitive test batteries such as CANTAB)
Time Frame: baseline, 8th week
Scores from neurocognitive test batteries such as CANTAB
baseline, 8th week
Changes from baseline in brain structure analyzed using the computational approach
Time Frame: baseline, 8th week
Morphometric analysis of brain structures in magnetic resonance imaging
baseline, 8th week
Changes from baseline in brain function analyzed using the computational approach (Blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signal intensity)
Time Frame: baseline, 8 week
Blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signal intensity and their connectivity assessed using functional magnetic resonance imaging scans
baseline, 8 week
Changes from baseline in brain biochemical metabolism analyzed using the computational approach (Brain metabolite concentrations assessed using magnetic resonance spectroscopy)
Time Frame: baseline, 8th week
Brain metabolite concentrations assessed using magnetic resonance spectroscopy
baseline, 8th week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change from baseline in Subjective Memory Complaints Questionnaire scores at 8th weeks
Time Frame: baseline, 8th week
baseline, 8th week
Number of participants with adverse events
Time Frame: 4th week
4th week
Number of participants with adverse events
Time Frame: 8th week
8th week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 26, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 2, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

March 3, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 1, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2015

Last Verified

June 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • EBI_CT_TF

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy Adults With Subjective Memory Complaints

Clinical Trials on placebo

3
Subscribe