Effects of HX106 on Improvement in Cognitive-Bio-Markers of Memory Function

May 25, 2015 updated by: In Kyoon Lyoo, Ewha Womans University

Effects of HX106 on Improvement in Cognitive-Bio-Markers of Memory Function in Healthy Adults With Subjective Memory Complaints: An 8-Week Prospective Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial With Multimodal Neuroimaging and Neurocognitive Assessments

The objectives of the current study are to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HX106 in healthy adults with subjective memory complaints for improving neurocognitive functions and to find the changes of brain using magnetic resonance imaging and their associations with the neurocognitive function enhancement.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

75

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 20 and 60 years old,
  • Global Deterioration Scale score (GDS) of 2
  • One or more symptoms of subjective memory impairment
  • High school or higher levels of education.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current pregnancy or breast-feeding
  • Evidence of neurologic or medical conditions
  • Axis I diagnosis when assessed by the board certified psychiatrist using the Structured Clinical Interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder, 4th edition (DSM-IV)(SCID-IV),
  • One or more major depressive episode during last 12 months
  • Mini-mental status examination score of 24 or less
  • Clinical Dementia Rating score of 0.5 or more suggesting cognitive impairment beyond self-perceived subjective deficits
  • Intelligence quotient less than 80
  • Any history of head trauma involving loss of consciousness or seizure
  • Contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
  • Use of psychotropics in last 3 months
  • Use of oral contraceptive medication
  • Participation in other clinical trials during the study period that might affect the outcome of the present study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Experimental: HX106 590mg
HX106 590mg/day
Experimental: HX106 1180mg
HX106 1180mg/day

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes From Baseline in Working Memory Domain Z-score
Time Frame: Baseline, 8th week

To assess the working memory performance, four well-established tests, including the symbol span from the Wechsler Memory Scale-IV, immediate recall domain from the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test, digit span, and letter number sequencing from the Korean version of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale were chosen.

Each test score was adjusted with age, sex, intelligent quotient, years of education, and baseline test scores. The adjusted test scores were then standardized into z-scores using all participants' means and standard deviations. The relative improvement (positive z-scores) or decline (negative z-scores) in performance was measured in a unit-free manner using the obtained z-scores. The individual z-scores of each test were averaged to the composite score for working memory domain.

Baseline, 8th week
Changes From Baseline in White Matter Integrity Assessment
Time Frame: Baseline, 8th weeks
Baseline, 8th weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Time Frame: 1st week
1st week
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Time Frame: 4th weeks
4th weeks
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Time Frame: 8th weeks
8th weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: In Kyoon Lyoo, MD, PhD, MMS, Ewha W. University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 26, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 1, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

October 8, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 9, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 25, 2015

Last Verified

May 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HX106

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy Adults With Subjective Memory Complaints

Clinical Trials on Placebo

3
Subscribe