Pd/Pa vs iFR™ in an Unselected Population Referred for Invasive Angiography (VERIFY2)

A Comparative Study of Resting Coronary Pressure Gradient, Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve in an Unselected Population Referred for Invasive Angiography: The VERIFY 2 Study

Instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR™) is a novel non-hyperaemic index of the functional significance of a coronary stenosis. Previous studies have shown variable levels of correlation with the established hyperaemic index FFR. In addition it has been proposed that iFR™ has superior diagnostic accuracy when compared to mean whole cardiac cycle Pd/Pa which can also be used to predict FFR.

We plan to undertake a prospective clinical study in consecutive patients already undergoing FFR assessment in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory to compare the ability of iFR™ and Pd/Pa (both measured using the proprietary Volcano system) to predict FFR. We will explore the level of misclassification of flow limiting disease that results from use of iFR™ and resting Pd/Pa employed using either binary cut-off algorithms or in a hybrid decision making protocol. We plan to analyse 260 vessels over a 18 month period. Hyperaemia will be induced by intravenous adenosine (140 ug/kg/min) administered wherever possible via an antecubital vein. Intra-coronary nitrates will also be given in line with the standard care procedure for FFR measurement. Final clinical decisions following coronary physiology will be based on steady state FFR.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Coronary Artery Disease; Atherosclerosis; Plaque; Fractional Flow Reserve

Detailed Description

Title:

A comparative study of resting Pd/Pa, instantaneous wave-free ratio and fractional flow reserve in an unselected population referred for invasive angiography.

Instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR™) is a novel non-hyperaemic index for assessing the functional significance of a coronary stenosis without coronary vasodilatation. In previous studies it has been compared to the hyperaemic index FFR with variable results. As a guide to determining the need for revascularisation it has been employed using a dichotomous cut-off without FFR or within a hybrid strategy in which lesions with intermediate iFR™ values are further interrogated using FFR.

The comparative diagnostic utility of iFR™ vs resting pressure (Pd/Pa) in reference to FFR is uncertain. We plan to undertake a prospective clinical study in consecutive patients undergoing clinically-indicated FFR assessment in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory with 30-80% diameter stenosis on quantitative coronary angiography (QCA). We will will use a proprietary (Volcano) pressure wire system and iFR ™ algorithm in order to calculate iFR™ and Pd/Pa in both resting and hyperemic conditions as well as FFR.

The sample size is 260 vessels and the enrolment period is 18 months. Hyperaemia will be induced by intravenous adenosine (140 ug/kg/min) administered wherever possible via an antecubital vein. Intra-coronary nitrates will also be given in line with the standard care procedure for FFR measurement.

Design:

In this prospective single centre cohort study all consecutive patients undergoing FFR are eligible for inclusion.

Active Hypothesis: (1) In comparison to an FFR for all strategy, revascularisation decisions made using binary cut-off values of iFR™ or resting Pd/Pa will result in similar levels of disagreement.

Active Hypothesis: (2) In comparison to an FFR for all strategy, revascularisation decisions using hybrid strategies incorporating iFR™ or resting Pd/Pa and FFR will result in similar levels of disagreement.

Active Hypothesis (3): Compared to iFR™ measured under resting conditions, hyperaemic iFR™ has a stronger correlation with FFR. Should this be the case, then the diagnostic efficiency of iFR™ can be interpreted as being improved with pharmacological vasodilatation. The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in diagnostic efficiency between iFR™ and hyperaemic iFR compared to FFR.

The clinical decisions in the catheter laboratory will align with routine care and be informed by all available clinical data and the FFR results.

This study is being conducted independently in the National Health Service without industry support or involvement.

Sample size: 260 vessels.

Statistical Analysis: Independent analysis of the completed dataset will be performed by Dr John McClure a biostatistician and lecturer in the Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences in Glasgow.

Methods: We will measure resting indices Pd/Pa and iFR™. Following this we will then measure hyperaemic readings including FFR and hyperaemic iFR™ (HiFR) sequentially using peripherally administered adenosine. Upon completion of enrollment we will produce summary statistics describing demographics and procedural data for the study cases. We will then calculate the discriminatory power of iFR™ using both the pre-specified binary cut-off values of 0.90 for iFR™ and 0.92 for resting Pd/Pa and the adenosine zones for iFR of 0.86-0.93 and resting Pd/Pa of 0.87-0.94. We will also analyse the correlation of HiFR with FFR

• Study Type: Observational
• Enrollment (Actual): 197

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United Kingdom
  • Dunbartonshire
    • Glasgow, Dunbartonshire, United Kingdom, G81 4DY
      • Golden Jubilee National Hospital

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

• Sampling Method: Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All consecutive patients undergoing FFR assessment for standard clinical indications.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

All patients ≥18 years of age, already undergoing pressure wire assessment and able to consent

Exclusion Criteria:

Inability to receive adenosine

Extremely tortuous vessels

Highly calcified lesions unsuitable for pressure wire assessment

coronary artery occlusion

acute MI within 3 days

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Number of groups / cohorts

1

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
All patients; All patients will undergo coronary physiological study with measurement of resting Pd/Pa, iFR™, hyperaemic iFR and FFR.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
To determine the diagnostic accuracy of instantaneous wave-free ratio (binary cut-off value 0.90) versus resting Pd/Pa (binary cut-off value 0.92) in reference to FFR.	Resting Pd/Pa will be compared to iFR™ in reference to FFR.	30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
To determine the diagnostic accuracy of hybrid iFR™/FFR versus hybrid resting Pd/Pa/FFR in reference to FFR	Adenosine zone for iFR is 0.86-0.93, Adenosine zone for resting Pd/Pa is 0.87-0.94.	30 days
To compare steady state FFR to minimum FFR	FFR recorded by the operator as the minimum value will be compared with the steady state value and the impact on vessel classification will be assessed	30 days
To investigate the influence of hyperemia on iFR™.	iFR™ will be reassessed after administration of adenosine to evaluate whether this increases agreement with FFR.	30 days
To assess the rate of revascularization per (1) artery and (2) per patient, associated with iFR™-guided management vs. FFR-guided management.	An analysis of the total number of vessels and patients that would potentially undergo revascularisation will be used to compare iFR™ versus FFR guided managment.	30 days
To assess serious adverse events in patients receiving intravenous adenosine	Patients will be monitored during coronary physiology studies to assess the safety of intravenous adenosine infusion with assessment of side effects leading to early termination of the infusion.	30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Golden Jubilee National Hospital
• Investigators: Study Director: Keith G Oldroyd, M.D., Golden Jubilee National Hospital

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, Lijmer JG, Moher D, Rennie D, de Vet HC; Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Clin Radiol. 2003 Aug;58(8):575-80. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(03)00258-7.
• Van't Veer M, Pijls NHJ, Hennigan B, Watkins S, Ali ZA, De Bruyne B, Zimmermann FM, van Nunen LX, Barbato E, Berry C, Oldroyd KG. Comparison of Different Diastolic Resting Indexes to iFR: Are They All Equal? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Dec 26;70(25):3088-3096. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.066.
• Hennigan B, Oldroyd KG, Berry C, Johnson N, McClure J, McCartney P, McEntegart MB, Eteiba H, Petrie MC, Rocchiccioli P, Good R, Lindsay MM, Hood S, Watkins S. Discordance Between Resting and Hyperemic Indices of Coronary Stenosis Severity: The VERIFY 2 Study (A Comparative Study of Resting Coronary Pressure Gradient, Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve in an Unselected Population Referred for Invasive Angiography). Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Nov;9(11):e004016. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004016.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: September 1, 2013
• Primary Completion (ACTUAL): April 1, 2015
• Study Completion (ACTUAL): April 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: February 26, 2015
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: March 2, 2015
• First Posted (ESTIMATE): March 3, 2015

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE): August 13, 2015
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: August 11, 2015
• Last Verified: August 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Myocardial Ischemia; Heart Diseases; Cardiovascular Diseases; Vascular Diseases; Arteriosclerosis; Arterial Occlusive Diseases; Coronary Disease; Coronary Artery Disease; Atherosclerosis
• Other Study ID Numbers: 1.0