Cooperation for Improved Pharmacotherapy in Home-dwelling Elderly People Receiving Polypharmacy - The COOP Study (COOP)

January 24, 2018 updated by: Torgeir Bruun Wyller, Oslo University Hospital
Polypharmacy increases the risk of adverse drug effects, interactions and other drug-related problems, and several studies indicate that inappropriate drug use is a major reason for poor health and impaired function in the elderly. A majority of interventions for improvement of drug treatment in the elderly have been evaluated by the use of surrogate outcomes such as drug-related problems, number of prescribed drugs or prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescriptions - and it is so far unclear whether such interventions can result in clinical significant improvements. The primary objective of this trial is therefore to evaluate the effect upon patients, relatives and local health care service of a structured cooperation between a hospital-based geriatrician and family physicians on complex drug regimens in home-dwelling frail elderly patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This is a 24 weeks cluster randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial. Family physicians will be invited to participate in the project with patients from their lists, and can participate with 1-5 patients each. The investigators will carry out cluster randomization on physician level instead of individual randomization on patient level.

The investigators suppose that such a comprehensive clinical evaluation and drug review that they will test, is most relevant for patients with relatively pronounced polypharmacy. It has previously been shown that conventionally used limits for polypharmacy, e.g. five drugs used regularly, identifies many patients without particular complex health states and without drug related problems. The investigators will therefore limit this project to patients using seven regular drugs or more, in order to increase the likelihood that they may benefit from a drug review.

A major challenge when studying complex interventions is to describe the intervention with sufficient precision as to facilitate replication. Our main strategy for this will be to compensate for the necessary degree of pragmatism in the interventional approach with a detailed description of the interventions that were in fact carried out, in particular changes in the drug regimens of the individual patients.

The intervention will consist of three main parts:

  1. Geriatric assessment: The patients will be seen by a physician trained in geriatric medicine. The physician will carry out a medical history and a physical examination, and relevant blood analyses and other supplementary test will be ordered if not already available. The geriatric work-up will be aimed at evaluating whether current medications are indicated, whether the relevant conditions are satisfactorily compensated, whether the dosages are appropriate, whether the patient has symptoms that may in reality be adverse drug effects, and whether drug-drug interactions or drug-disease interactions are likely to occur. Published tools like the START (Screening Tool of Older Persons' Prescriptions) criteria, Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment (STOPP) criteria and The Norwegian General Practice (NORGEP) criteria will be used.
  2. Conference with common drug review: The main purpose of this conference is to combine the competence of the geriatrician and that of the family physician in a focused drug review. The two physicians will discuss the patient's drug list systematically. The geriatrician may suggest changes in the drug regimen, but the family physician retains the medical responsibility for the patient and is in charge of all ordinations and medication changes.
  3. Clinical follow-up: Depending on medication changes that have been done, the two physicians will arrange the necessary follow-up within the project period.

The investigators will assess the outcomes at 16 and 24 weeks, counted from baseline, and will also assess baseline values for the outcomes in order to adjust for potential inequalities.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

192

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Oslo, Norway, 0424
        • Dept. of Geriatric Medicine, Oslo University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

70 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The patient must be on the list of one of the family physicians participating in the study
  • Home dwelling (not permanently institutionalised)
  • Medications administered by the home nursing service
  • Polypharmacy defined as the use of at least seven different systemic medications taken regularly
  • Informed consent by the patient or a close relative

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient or relative denies inclusion
  • The family physician does not want the particular patient to participate
  • Moderate/severe dementia (Clinical Dementia Rating Scale score > 1) and contact with the closest proxy less than once every other week.
  • The patient does not speak/understand Norwegian
  • Expected to become permanently institutionalised within six months
  • Life expectancy < six months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Comprehensive drug review
1) Geriatric assessment including medical history, physical examination, supplementary tests. The geriatric work-up will be aimed at evaluating whether current medications are indicated, whether the relevant conditions are satisfactorily compensated, whether the dosages are appropriate, whether the patient has symptoms that may in reality be adverse drug effects, and whether drug-drug interactions or drug-disease interactions are likely to occur. 2) Conference with common drug review. The project physician and the family physician will discuss the patient's drug list systematically. 3) Individualized clinical follow-up depending on the medication changes that have been done.
No Intervention: Control group
Follow-up by family physician "as usual".

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Health-related quality of life as measured with 15D
Time Frame: 16 weeks
16 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mortality
Time Frame: 16 weeks
16 weeks
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)
Time Frame: 16 weeks
16 weeks
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)
Time Frame: 24 weeks
24 weeks
Gait speed
Time Frame: 16 weeks
16 weeks
Gait speed
Time Frame: 24 weeks
24 weeks
Hand grip strength
Time Frame: 16 weeks
16 weeks
Hand grip strength
Time Frame: 24 weeks
24 weeks
Functional Independence Measure (FIM)
Time Frame: 16 weeks
16 weeks
Functional Independence Measure (FIM)
Time Frame: 24 weeks
24 weeks
Trail making test A and B
Time Frame: 16 weeks
16 weeks
Trail making test A and B
Time Frame: 24 weeks
24 weeks
Digit Span
Time Frame: 16 weeks
16 weeks
Digit Span
Time Frame: 24 weeks
24 weeks
Five Digits Test
Time Frame: 16 weeks
16 weeks
Five Digits Test
Time Frame: 24 weeks
24 weeks
Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI)
Time Frame: 16 weeks
16 weeks
Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI)
Time Frame: 24 weeks
24 weeks
Assessment of Underutilization (AOU)
Time Frame: 16 weeks
16 weeks
Assessment of Underutilization (AOU)
Time Frame: 24 weeks
24 weeks
Number of falls
Time Frame: During the first 16 weeks after baseline
Recorded with the aid of diaries kept by patients/caregivers
During the first 16 weeks after baseline
Number of falls
Time Frame: During the first 24 weeks after baseline
Recorded with the aid of diaries kept by patients/caregivers
During the first 24 weeks after baseline
Orthostatic blood pressure
Time Frame: 16 weeks
16 weeks
Orthostatic blood pressure
Time Frame: 24 weeks
24 weeks
Changes in body weight
Time Frame: 16 weeks
16 weeks
Changes in body weight
Time Frame: 24 weeks
24 weeks
Relative Stress Scale
Time Frame: 16 weeks
16 weeks
Relative Stress Scale
Time Frame: 24 weeks
24 weeks
Number of hospital admissions (with reasons)
Time Frame: During the first 16 weeks from baseline
During the first 16 weeks from baseline
Number of hospital admissions (with reasons)
Time Frame: During the first 24 weeks from baseline
During the first 24 weeks from baseline
Number of days in own home (in contrast to being in hospital or nursing home)
Time Frame: During the first 16 weeks from baseline
During the first 16 weeks from baseline
Number of days in own home (in contrast to being in hospital or nursing home)
Time Frame: During the first 24 weeks from baseline
During the first 24 weeks from baseline
Admission to permanent institutional care
Time Frame: 16 weeks
16 weeks
Admission to permanent institutional care
Time Frame: 24 weeks
24 weeks
Current use of home nursing service
Time Frame: 16 weeks
16 weeks
Current use of home nursing service
Time Frame: 24 weeks
24 weeks
Mortality
Time Frame: 24 weeks
24 weeks
Health-related quality of life as measured with 15D
Time Frame: 24 weeks
24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Torgeir B Wyller, MD PhD, Oslo University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

September 22, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 27, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

March 5, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 26, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 24, 2018

Last Verified

January 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 222033/H10

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Drug Usage

Clinical Trials on Comprehensive drug review

Subscribe