SNP-based Microdeletion and Aneuploidy RegisTry (SMART) (SMART)

January 27, 2021 updated by: Natera, Inc.

SNP-based Microdeletion and Aneuploidy RegisTry

This multi-center prospective observational study is designed to track birth outcomes and perinatal correlates to the Panorama prenatal screening test in the general population among ten thousand women who present clinically and elect Panorama microdeletion and aneuploidy screening as part of their routine care. The primary objective is to evaluate the performance of Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP)-based Non Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) for 22q11.2 microdeletion (DiGeorge syndrome) in this large cohort of pregnant women. This will be done by performing a review of perinatal medical records and obtaining biospecimens after birth to perform genetic diagnostic testing for 22q11.2 deletion. Results from the follow-up specimens will be compared to those obtained by the Panorama screening test to determine test performance. Specific test performance parameters will include: PPV, specificity, and sensitivity.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The primary objective is to determine in a prospective study the performance of SNP based NIPT for the 22q11.2 microdeletion (DiGeorge syndrome) in a large cohort of pregnant women clinically opting for this form of screening. Specific test performance parameters will include: positive predictive value (PPV), specificity, and sensitivity.

Secondary objectives include:

  1. Determine the test performance (PPV, specificity) of SNP based NIPT for detecting other microdeletion syndromes available in the Panorama microdeletion panel (e.g., 1p36 deletion, Cri-du-chat, Prader-Willi, and Angelman) individually and all combined (including 22q11.2). Given the incidences of <1:5000, the confidence intervals are expected to be large.
  2. Determine the failure ('no call') rate for the Next-generation Aneuploidy Test Using SNPs (NATUS) method for 22q11.2 detection, as well as for aneuploidy.
  3. Determine whether a more precise risk for aneuploidy can be generated in the setting of low fetal fraction by incorporating maternal BMI (adjusted fetal fraction percentile).
  4. Assess whether low fetal fraction is associated with specific ultrasound findings that may indicate aneuploidy (e.g. triploidy, trisomy 13 and 18).
  5. Investigate the relationship between NIPT and sonographic (nuchal translucency and anatomy survey) markers and serum markers from 1st and 2nd trimester aneuploidy screening.
  6. Determine sensitivity, specificity, and PPV for chromosomal aneuploidies and sex chromosome abnormalities.
  7. Perform detailed assessment of false positive aneuploidy samples to better understand sources of error, including placental studies to further refine issues surrounding mosaicism as NIPT represents circulating placental DNA.
  8. Investigate any relationships between circulating placental DNA (fetal fraction) or other test parameters including potential genotypic markers, and outcomes related to abnormal placentation (including but not limited to preeclampsia, small for gestational age and morbidly adherent placenta).
  9. Investigate other risk factors that may impact risk assessment for microdeletions including sonographic findings consistent with 22q11.2 (cardiac anomalies and thymus size).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

20960

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New South Wales
      • Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia, 2050
        • Royal Prince Alfred
      • Dublin, Ireland, 1
        • Royal College Surgeons in Ireland
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08028
        • Dexeus
      • Gothenburg, Sweden, SE-416 85
        • Sahlgrenska University Hospital
      • London, United Kingdom, SW17 0QT
        • St. George University Hospital
    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94158
        • University of California, San Francisco
    • New Jersey
      • Camden, New Jersey, United States, 08103
        • Cooper University Hospital
      • Mount Laurel, New Jersey, United States, 08054
        • Virtua
      • New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States, 08901
        • St. Peter's University
    • New York
      • Garden City, New York, United States, 11530
        • Complete Women's Healthcare
      • Manhasset, New York, United States, 11030
        • North Shore University Hospital
      • Mineola, New York, United States, 11501
        • Madonna Perinatal
      • New Hyde Park, New York, United States, 11040
        • Long Island Jewish Medical Center
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Columbia University
      • New York, New York, United States, 10016
        • New York University
      • New York, New York, United States, 10461
        • Montefiore Medical Center
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
        • Icahn School of Medicine Mt Sinai
      • Port Jefferson, New York, United States, 11777
        • Suffolk OB
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78758
        • North Austin Maternal Fetal Medicine
      • Longview, Texas, United States, 75601
        • Zeid Women's Health Center
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84132
        • University of Utah

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 44 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Pregnant women

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Singleton pregnancy
  • Receiving Panorama prenatal screening test for both microdeletions (at least 22q11.2) and aneuploidy
  • Planned hospital delivery
  • Gestational age of ≥ 9 weeks, 0 days based on clinical information and evaluation.
  • Able to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Received results of the Panorama test prior to enrollment
  • Organ transplant recipient
  • Egg donor used

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Pregnancies undergoing prenatal microdeletion screening

Pregnant women undergoing non-invasive prenatal screening for microdeletion and aneuploidy syndromes.

No drug will be administrated, this cohort will undergo a non invasive prenatal blood test and then follow up data and specimens will be collected for research analysis.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
22q11.2 Snp-based non-invasive prenatal screening test performance, including positive predictive value (PPV), specificity, and sensitivity
Time Frame: 3 years
To determine in a prospective study the performance of SNP based NIPT for the 22q11.2 microdeletion (DiGeorge syndrome) in a large cohort of pregnant women clinically opting for this form of screening.
3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Combined microdeletion syndrome screening test performance
Time Frame: 3 years
Determine the test performance (PPV, specificity) of SNP based NIPT for detecting other microdeletion syndromes available in the Panorama microdeletion panel (e.g., 1p36 deletion, Cri-du-chat, Prader-Willi, and Angelman) individually and all combined (including 22q11.2). Given the incidences of <1:5000, the confidence intervals are expected to be large.
3 years
No call rate
Time Frame: 3 years
Determine the failure ('no call') rate for the NATUS method for 22q11.2 detection, as well as for aneuploidy.
3 years
Low fetal fraction aneuploidy risk refinement
Time Frame: 3 years
Determine whether a more precise risk for aneuploidy can be generated in the setting of low fetal fraction by incorporating maternal BMI (adjusted fetal fraction percentile), or whether low fetal fraction is associated with specific ultrasound findings that may indicate aneuploidy (e.g. triploidy, trisomy 13 and 18).
3 years
Placental mosaicism exploration
Time Frame: 3 years
Perform detailed assessment of false positive aneuploidy samples to better understand sources of error, including placental studies to further refine issues surrounding mosaicism as NIPT represents circulating placental DNA.
3 years
Placental complications exploration
Time Frame: 3 years
Investigate any relationships between circulating placental DNA (fetal fraction) or other test parameters including potential genotypic markers, and outcomes related to abnormal placentation (including but not limited to preeclampsia, small for gestational age and morbidly adherent placenta).
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mary Norton, MD, University of California, San Francisco
  • Principal Investigator: Peer Dar, MD, Montefiore Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 2, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 2, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

March 6, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 29, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 27, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe