Assessment of Automated Breast Ultrasound

April 3, 2020 updated by: Denise Chough, MD, University of Pittsburgh

The Assessment of the Role of Automated Breast Ultrasound (ABUS) in Screening Women With Dense Breasts for Early Detection of Breast Cancer

The investigators are interested in assessing the value of and comparing the use of automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) (either as a primary screening approach or as a supplementary procedure) with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). The purpose of this project is to perform a preliminary prospective study on women who are most likely to benefit from the use of ABUS and/or DBT (or a combination of both) in the screening environment.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

  1. After appropriate training and certification of technologists and Mammography Quality Standards Act (MQSA) qualifications of the participating radiologists, the investigators will recruit sequentially approximately 600 women known to have a defined region of highly dense tissue or with known heterogeneously dense and/or primarily dense breast tissue (from a prior mammogram) who are scheduled to undergo routine mammography screening that includes a DBT examination.
  2. Consenting women will undergo a DBT examination as part of their routine clinical exam and an ABUS examination as a part of the experiment. All examinations will be performed by certified technologists in the performance of each of the procedures in question (DBT or ABUS).
  3. DBT, ABUS, and a combination of both, will be independently reviewed and interpreted (Breast Imaging, Reporting and Data System rated) by experienced and specifically trained, MQSA qualified radiologists in a cross balanced (cases by mode and by reader) study design.
  4. Using the results of the interpretations in a slightly modified "LOGICAL OR" mode, namely the highest rating determines the recommendation/need for follow up, the investigators will perform imaging based diagnostic work ups as needed (i.e., resulting from the "arbitration step"). All diagnostic follow up studies, as needed, will not be a part of the study protocol, with the exception of acquiring diagnostic outcome measures from medical records.
  5. The investigators will compare rates of false positives as a result of interpreting DBT vs. ABUS vs. a combination of both, including recall for additional testing, short-interval follow-up rates and biopsy rates. The sample in this preliminary study is too small to assess positive predictive values (PPVs), so the investigators will focus here on negative predictive values (NPVs). For marginal value assessment when utilizing both modalities, the investigators will also assess the type of abnormalities detected by each modality, assuming that a larger study will be required to assess cancer detection rates (by type etc.).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

598

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
        • Magee-Womens Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Women aged 40 to 75 years of age with a defined region of extremely dense breast tissue or heterogeneously dense or extremely dense parenchyma by prior digital mammography report (i.e., "dense breasts"), presenting for routine annual mammography with digital breast tomosynthesis.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 40 to 75 years of age with a
  • defined region of extremely dense breast tissue or heterogeneously dense or extremely dense parenchyma by prior digital mammography report (i.e., "dense breasts")
  • presenting for routine annual mammography with digital breast tomosynthesis.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known to be at high risk for breast cancer due to known or suspected pathologic breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA) (i.e. first-degree relative with known mutation) or prior chest radiation therapy before age 30;
  • No mammogram within the prior 3 years;
  • Signs or symptoms of breast disease including lump, bloody or spontaneous clear nipple discharge, eczema of the nipple;
  • Pregnancy at the time of screening by self report or lactation within the prior 6 months;
  • Breast implants, as assessment of breast density may be problematic;
  • Recent prior breast surgery or breast biopsy or cyst aspiration within the prior 12 months;
  • Had prior screening with DBT and not a hand held ABUS, or had prior screening with ABUS and not DBT.
  • Prior malignancy other than: Breast cancer at least one year earlier (12 full months have elapsed since the last treatment surgery) with no known distant metastases and no known residual tumor, or Basal or squamous cell skin cancer or in situ cervical cancer, or Other cancer for which the patient has been disease free for ≥ 5 years, with no recurrence of cancer in the last five years and no residual disease detected in the last five years
  • Unwilling or unable to provide consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
false positive rates
Time Frame: from the date interpretation until the date routine follow-up, biopsy results, or pathology results, whichever comes first, up to 24 months.
from the date interpretation until the date routine follow-up, biopsy results, or pathology results, whichever comes first, up to 24 months.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Denise M Chough, MD, University of Pittsburgh

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 5, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

March 11, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 6, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 3, 2020

Last Verified

April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PRO14110472

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Subscribe