Neurocognitive Outcome of Conformal WBRT w/wo Hippocampal Avoidance for Brain Metastases

July 17, 2019 updated by: National Taiwan University Hospital

Neurocognitive Outcome of Conformal Whole Brain Radiotherapy With or Without Hippocampal Avoidance for Brain Metastases: A Phase II Single Blind Randomized Trial

Brain metastases are the most common brain tumors in adults. It is estimated that around 10-30% of cancer patients would develop brain metastases during the course of their illness.

Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) is the treatment of choice for the majority of patients with brain metastases. WBRT yields high radiologic response rate (27~56%) and is effective in rapid palliation of neurologic symptoms as well as prolongs time to neurocognitive function decline caused by intracranial lesions. By using conventional fractionation, 33% of patients developed late neurocognitive toxicity while memory impairment was the most common symptom. The incidence is even higher when a formal and sensitive neurocognitive assessment was prospectively evaluated. With more long-term survivors nowadays, it has become increasingly important to minimize neurocognitive function decline and maintain quality of life in patients with brain metastasis.

The function of hippocampus is cooperation in learning, consolidation and retrieval of information and essential for formation of new memories. Bilateral and unilateral radiation injury of the hippocampus is known to alter learning and memory formation. Several preclinical studies support the hypothesis of hippocampus-mediated cognitive dysfunction by ionizing radiation. Clinical studies show increase in radiation dose to hippocampus is associated with subsequent neurocognitive function impairment in adult and pediatric patients. Furthermore, the preliminary result of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0933 suggested hippocampal avoidance significant reduce the mean relative decline at 4 months from 30% in historical cohort with WBRT to 7% in experimental cohort.

Previous studies showed brain structures other than hippocampus are also associated with radiation-induced decline in neurocognitive function. There is presence of placebo effect for interventions seeking improvement in neurocognitive function. In present study, a single blind randomized phase II trial is designed to investigate the effectiveness of neurocognitive function preservation using conformal WBRT with or without hippocampal avoidance.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a single institutional, randomized phase II study to assess the neurocognitive outcome of conformal WBRT with or without hippocampal avoidance in patients with multiple brain metastases.

Patients will be randomly assigned 1:1 to receive conformal WBRT with or without hippocampal avoidance using permuted blocks within strata that are defined by Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) score and baseline neurocognitive status. All patients and co-investigators except the principal investigator and attending radiation oncologists will be blinded for treatment groups.

The whole brain planning target volume (PTV) will receive 30 Gy in 10 fractions. Treatment will be delivered once daily, 5 fractions per week, over 2 to 2.5 weeks. Breaks in treatment should be minimized.

Hippocampal Avoidance WBRT:

The dose is prescribed such as 90% of cranial content PTV is covered by the prescription dose.

Maximum dose to 2% of the PTV (D2%) is 37.5 Gy, and minimum dose to 98% of the PTV (D98%) is 25 Gy. Minimum dose to 100% of the hippocampal avoidance regions is 10 Gy, and dose to any point within the hippocampal avoidance regions cannot exceed 17 Gy.

Conformal WBRT:

The dose is prescribed such as 95% of cranial content PTV is covered by the prescription dose.

Maximum dose to 1% of the PTV (D1%) is 36 Gy, and minimum dose to 99% of the PTV (D99%) is 27 Gy.

Follow-up & Assessment

Side effect evaluation:

  • Acute (≤ 90 days from WBRT start) toxicities (CTCAE ver.4)
  • Late (> 90 days from WBRT start) toxicities (CTCAE ver.4)

Functional evaluation: at baseline, 2-, 4- ,and 6-month, every 3 months for 12 months until intracranial disease progression or death after WBRT

  • Neurocognitive function
  • Self-reported cognitive functioning (two items from EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 Taiwan)
  • Health-related quality of life specific for brain neoplasms (EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Brain Neoplasm Taiwan)

Efficacy evaluation:

  • Follow-up brain MRI at 4-, 9- ,and 12-month until intracranial disease progression, or death.
  • Overall survival

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

70

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Taipei, Taiwan, 100
        • National Taiwan University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

To be eligible for inclusion, patients must fulfill the following criteria:

  1. Patients with a histologic diagnosis of non-hematopoietic malignancy and radiographic evidence of brain metastases
  2. Patients with brain metastasis outside a 5-mm margin around either hippocampus on gadolinium contrast enhanced MRI obtained within 30 days prior to registration
  3. Patients with brain metastasis who have not been or will not be treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or have received SRS for≤ 5 intracranial metastatic lesions
  4. No evidence of leptomeningeal metastasis on gadolinium-enhanced MRI within 30 days prior registration
  5. Age ≥ 20 years
  6. Karnofsky Performance Status ≥ 60%
  7. Life expectancy of ≥ 4 months.
  8. Women of childbearing potential and male participants must practice adequate contraception
  9. Patients must be able to comply with the study protocol and follow-up schedules and provide study- specific informed consent

Exclusion criteria:

Patients fulfill any of the following criteria will be excluded from this trial

  1. Prior radiotherapy to brain or SRS to > 5 intracranial metastatic lesion(s) or the biological equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions was greater than 7.3 Gy to 40% of the volume of bilateral hippocampus from prior SRS
  2. Serum creatinine > 2.0 mg/dL within 30 days prior registration
  3. Contraindication to MRI such as implanted metal devices or foreign bodies, severe claustrophobia
  4. Patients with leptomeningeal metastases
  5. Severe, active comorbidities which, in the judgment of the investigator, would make the patient inappropriate for entry into this study or interfere significantly with the proper assessment of safety and adverse events of the protocol, or limit compliance with study requirements, defined as follows:

    1. Uncontrolled active infection requiring intravenous antibiotics at the time of registration
    2. Transmural myocardial infarction ≤ 6 months prior to registration
    3. Unstable angina or congestive heart failure requiring hospitalization ≤ 6 months prior to registration
    4. Life-threatening uncontrolled clinically significant cardiac arrhythmias
    5. Hepatic insufficiency resulting in clinical jaundice and/or coagulation defects
    6. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation or other respiratory illness requiring hospitalization or precluding study therapy at the time of registration
    7. Uncontrolled psychiatric disorder
    8. Uncontrolled, clinically significant cardiac arrhythmias
  6. Will receive any other investigational agent or chemotherapy and/or target therapies during WBRT
  7. Women of childbearing potential and male participants who are sexually active and not willing/able to use medically acceptable forms of contraception; this exclusion is necessary because the radiation treatment involved in this study may be significantly teratogenic

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Hippocampal avoidance WBRT
Conformal whole brain radiotherapy with hippocampal avoidance
Conformal Whole Brain Radiotherapy 30 Gy in 10 fractions with Hippocampal Avoidance using Intensity modulated radiotherapy, Volumetric arc therapy, or Tomotherapy
Active Comparator: Conformal WBRT
Conformal whole brain radiotherapy without hippocampal avoidance
Conformal Whole Brain Radiotherapy 30 Gy in 10 fractions with Hippocampal Avoidance using Intensity modulated radiotherapy, Volumetric arc therapy, or Tomotherapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVTL-R) delayed recall score
Time Frame: At 4 months after radiotherapy
Decline in Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVTL-R) delayed recall score from baseline to 4 months after the start of conformal whole brain radiotherapy with or without hippocampal avoidance for brain metastases
At 4 months after radiotherapy

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intracranial progression (Number of participant with intracranial progression on MRI of brain)
Time Frame: From date of enrolment until the date of first documented intracranial progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 60 months
Number of participant with intracranial progression on MRI of brain
From date of enrolment until the date of first documented intracranial progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 60 months
Overall survival
Time Frame: From date of enrollment until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 60 months
Number of patients died
From date of enrollment until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 60 months
Neurocognitive function by a standardized neurocognitive battery
Time Frame: at 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12 months after radiotherapy, and then every 3 months until date of death from any cause, assessed up to 24 months
Evaluate neurocognitive function by a standardized neurocognitive battery (HVTL-R, Trail Making Test Part A & B, forward & backward Digit Span).
at 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12 months after radiotherapy, and then every 3 months until date of death from any cause, assessed up to 24 months
Patient reported outcome (Quality of Life questionnaire)
Time Frame: at 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12 months after radiotherapy, and then every 3 months until date of death from any cause, assessed up to 24 months
EORTC Quality of Life-Core 30 questionnaire module and Quality of Life questionnaire -brain
at 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12 months after radiotherapy, and then every 3 months until date of death from any cause, assessed up to 24 months
Acute toxicity (Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events version 4)
Time Frame: From date of radiotherapy until 90 days after radiotherapy starts
Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events version 4
From date of radiotherapy until 90 days after radiotherapy starts
Late toxicity (Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events version 4)
Time Frame: From 90 days after radiotherapy starts until the date of death from any cause, up to 60 months
Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events version 4
From 90 days after radiotherapy starts until the date of death from any cause, up to 60 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Genomic risk of neurocognitive decline after WBRT
Time Frame: At 4 months after radiotherapy
Number of participants with Genomic risk of neurocognitive impairment after WBRT
At 4 months after radiotherapy

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 3, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 23, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 18, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

March 19, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 19, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 17, 2019

Last Verified

March 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Metastatic Malignant Neoplasm to Brain

Clinical Trials on Hippocampal avoidance WBRT

Subscribe