"Magnetic Resonance Imaging Hysterosalpingography for the Integral Evaluation of the Infertile Patient." (HSG-RM)

May 31, 2016 updated by: Diagnostico Maipu

"Estudio de Histerosalpingografía Por Resonancia Magnética Para la evaluación Integral de la Paciente infértil."

Abstract:

Recent advances in reproductive medicine have generated a demand for more accurate imaging methods for identifying the specific cause of female infertility and other gynecologic disorders. Virtual hysterosalpingography is an emerging modality in which aspects of the established technique of hysterosalpingography are combined with the cutting-edge technology of multidetector computed tomography (CT) to allow a comprehensive and highly accurate evaluation of both the female reproductive system and the pelvic anatomy generally. Unlike ultrasonography (US) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, multidetector CT is capable of depicting both the external and internal surfaces of the uterus, fallopian tubes, and other pelvic organs, providing high-resolution data that are suitable for two- and three-dimensional reconstructions and virtual endoscopic views. Thus, virtual hysterosalpingography may prove to be superior to other noninvasive modalities for evaluating tubal patency. Moreover, in comparison with conventional hysterosalpingography, which may involve cervical clamping, virtual hysterosalpingography is painless. Because of the health risks associated with ionizing radiation, the use of another modality (eg, MR imaging, US) may be preferred if the presence of a focal uterine lesion is strongly suspected. However, virtual hysterosalpingography with multidetector CT may provide a diagnostic advantage in complex cases.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Infertility is a common problem that affects one in six couples. It is defined as the inability to get pregnant after a reasonable time (12 months) of sex without using birth control measures. The causes of the increased prevalence of infertility are difficult to establish. This increase could be due to several factors such as the postponement of the time when it is decided to have children, alterations in semen quality, changes in sexual behavior, etc. The study of the infertile couple has always been focussed on different factors: ovulatory (20%), utero-tubal (30%) , the migration of sperm (10%) and male (30%). About 40% of all infertile couples exhibit a combination of factors and about 15% do not display any objective alteration leading to a definite diagnosis.

During the last two decades major changes occurred in the approach to infertility. With the introduction of new assisted reproductive technologies, the development of molecular biology and novel diagnostic imaging methods, there have been major advances in the evaluation and treatment of couples considered infertile.

Hysterosalpingography (HSG) is the useful imaging method for evaluating the fallopian tubes and uterine cavity. Scanning is performed in the follicular phase of the cycle and is carried out in an X-ray fluoroscopy. Indications for HSG have been reduced with the introduction of new diagnostic methods, actually being basically an essencial technique used in the study of the factors responsible for infertility as well as recurrent abortions. On the downside, exposure to radiation and use of impingement of the cervix during the procedure, with the possible complications mentioned.

Due to technological advances, a new technique based on CT studies has been developed, and it is called virtual Hysterosalpingography (HSG-V). It is performed with a multislice CT scanner with high resolution and quality of images. It is a noninvasive study and needs none pinch the cervix. It has the ability to assess blockages and defects or other uterine and tubal problems, besides appreciating for abnormalities that may cause the inability of a couple to achieve pregnancy. Also reveals the organs of the pelvis in its entirety and fallopian tubes, and inside its walls. This helps to detect the presence of polyps, adhesions, fibroids, narrow tubes, or occupying lesions light. Compared with conventional HSG, the advantage is that it is non-invasive, painless and takes only a few seconds, conditions that provide women with greater comfort. Moreover, it provides the doctor with more complete information than the conventional method, because it provides two-dimensional and three-dimensional endoscopic images. Additionally, the radiation received by the patient is less than that required in the conventional study.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the female pelvis is the largest study performance evaluation of pelvic pathology (endometriosis, fibroids, adenomyosis, etc.). Contributing to this characteristics of being non-invasive and does not use ionizing radiation. It has high resolving power for the assessment of ovarian and uterine pathology, being especially useful for cases where ultrasound is inconclusive. It also plays a dual role in the case of uterine malformations: It allows the extension and/or confirmation of the ultrasound diagnosis and evaluates the associated malformations, mainly of the urinary system. Major limitations of the MRI are low availability, presence of a pacemaker or metallic foreign bodies. A relative advantage is its lower cost compared to the HSG-V, and lower cost if making multiple conventional studies.

Current assessment of the patient with infertility involves several studies to determine the causative factor. The virtues of the MRI position it as an integrative alternative to conventional multi-modal methods in the study of the female pelvis.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Buenos Aires
      • Vicente Lopez, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1638
        • Recruiting
        • Diagnostico Maipu
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Patricia Carrascosa, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Javier Vallejos, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Carlos Capuñay, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Jimena Carpio, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Mariano Baronio, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Lorena Sarati, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Requested Virtual Hysterosalpingography.
  • Diagnosis of Infertility.
  • Informed Consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy at the time of examination.
  • Carriers of pacemaker devices.
  • Ferromagnetic elements incompatible with MRI.
  • Claustrophobia.
  • Allergy to iodine.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Open Label

This is a single arm open label study.

Its procedures involve:

  • Transvaginal Echography
  • Conventional Virtual Histerosalpingography
  • Virtual Histerosalpingography by MRI
  • Blood draw for Antimullerian Hormone Dosing
Virtual hysterosalpingography: a new multidetector CT technique for evaluating the female reproductive system
Other Names:
  • HSG-V
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Virtual hysterosalpingography
Other Names:
  • HSG-MRI
Blood Draw for Antimullerian Hormone dosing
Transvaginal Echography for evaluating the female reproductive system
Other Names:
  • TV-Echo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tubal patency
Time Frame: Six months
Evaluation of the tubal patency between CT and MRI
Six months
Endocavitary pathology
Time Frame: Six months
Evaluation of endocavitary pathology between US, CT and MRI
Six months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Antral follicle count
Time Frame: Six months
Comparison of antral follicle count between US and MRI and its correlation with antimullerian hormone
Six months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 20, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 20, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

March 25, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 1, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 31, 2016

Last Verified

May 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Women Infertility

Clinical Trials on TC Virtual Hysterosalpingography

3
Subscribe